Comparison of arch forms between Korean and Japanese in Class I, II, and III malocclusion |
Lee, Chae-Hyung
(Department of Orthodontics, Graduate School of Clinical Dental Science, The Catholic University of Korea)
Mo, Sung-Seo (Department of Orthodontics, Graduate School of Clinical Dental Science, The Catholic University of Korea) Kang, Yoon-Goo (Department of Orthodontics, Graduate School of Clinical Dental Science, The Catholic University of Korea) Nojima, Kunihiko (Department of Orthodontics, Tokyo Dental College) Kim, Young-Ho (Department of Orthodontics, The Institute of Oral Health & Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) Kook, Yoon-Ah (Department of Orthodontics, Graduate School of Clinical Dental Science, The Catholic University of Korea) |
1 | Kwon YC, Sung JO, Kwon OW, Sung JH. The dental arch form in normal occlusion. Korean J Orthod 1989;19:95-106 과학기술학회마을 |
2 | Gardner SD. Posttreatment and postretention changes following orthodontic therapy. Angle Orthod. 1976;46:151-61 PUBMED |
3 | Artun J, Garol JD, Little RM. Long-term stability of mandibular incisors following successful treatment of Class II division 1, malocclusions. Angle Orthod. 1996;66:229-38 PUBMED |
4 | Uesato G. Esthetic facial balance of American-Japanese. Am J Orthod 1968;54:601-11 DOI ScienceOn |
5 | Lavelle CLB. A study of craniofacial form. Angle Orthod 1979;49: 65-72 PUBMED |
6 | Huang ST, Miura F, Soma K. A dental anthropological study of Chinese in Taiwan (2). Teeth size, dental arch dimensions and forms. Gaoxiong Yi Xue Ke Xue Za Zhi 1991;7:635-43 PUBMED |
7 | Staley RN, Stuntz WR, Peterson LC. A comparison of arch widths in adults with normal occlusion and adults with class II division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod 1985;88:163-9 DOI ScienceOn |
8 | Andrews LF. Straight wire-the concept and appliance. San Diego: L. A. Wells Co; 1989 |
9 | Aoki H, Tsuta A, Ukiya M. A morphological study and comparison of the dental arch form of Japanese and American adults: detailed measurements of the transverse width. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 1971;12:9-14 PUBMED |
10 | Chuck GC. Ideal arch form. Angle Orthod 1934;4:312-27 |
11 | Noroozi H, Nik TH, Saeeda R. The dental arch form revisited. Angle Orthod 2001;71:386-9 PUBMED |
12 | Altemus LA. A comparison of cephalofacial relationships. Angle Orthod 1960;30:223-39 |
13 | Downs WB. Variations in facial relationships: Their significance in treatment and prognosis. Am J Orthod 1948;34:812-40 DOI ScienceOn |
14 | Kim YS, Lee KS. A longitudinal study on the developmental changes of dental arch width and length. Korean J Orthod 2000;30:19-31 |
15 | Kim SC. A study on the configurations of Korean normal dental arches for preformed arch wire. Korean J Orthod 1984;14:93-101 |
16 | Laine T. Alveolar arch dimensions and Occlusal traits. An epidemiologic study. Angle Orthod 1985;55:234-41 PUBMED |
17 | Burke SP, Silveira AM, Goldsmith LJ. A meta-analysis of mandibular intercanine width in treatment and postretention. Angle Orthod 1998;68:53-60 PUBMED |
18 | Buschang PH, Stroud J, Alexander RG. Differences in dental arch morphology among adult females with untreated Class I and Class II malocclusion. Eur J Orthod 1994;16:47-52 DOI PUBMED |
19 | Little RM. Stability and relapse of dental arch alignment. Br J Orthod 1990;17:235-41 DOI PUBMED |
20 | Iwasawa T, Moro T, Nakamura K. Tweed triangle and soft-tissue considerstion of Japanese with normal occlusion and good facial profile. Am J Orthod 1977;72:119-27 DOI ScienceOn |
21 | Kasai K, Kanazawa E, Aboshi H, Richards LC, Matsuno M. Dental arch form in three Pacific populations: a comparison with Japanese and Australian aboriginal samples. J Nihon Univ Sch Dent 1997;39:196-201 DOI PUBMED |
22 | Burris BG, Harris EF. Maxillary arch size and shape in American blacks and whites. Angle Orthod 2000;70:297-302 PUBMED |
23 | Chan GK. A cephalometric appraisal of the Chinese (Cantonese). Am J Orthod 1972;61:279-85 DOI ScienceOn |
24 | Miyazaki H, Yamaguchi Y, Takehara T. Dental arch and palate in Taiwan aboriginals-Ami, Bunun, Paiwan and Rukai tribes. Arch Oral BioI 1993;38:729-35 DOI ScienceOn |
25 | Chang Yl, Yang WS, Nalm DS, Moon SC. A study for the development of the Korean orthodontic bracket. Korean J Orthod 2000;30:565-78 과학기술학회마을 |
26 | Nahm DS. Dental anthropological study on the occlusal characteristics of the Koreans. Korean J Orthod 1994;24:247-73 |
27 | Nojima K, McLaughlin RP, Isshiki Y, Sinclair PM. A Comparative study of Caucasian and Japanese mandibular clinical arch forms. Angle Orthod 2001;71:195-200 PUBMED |
28 | Bhat M. Enlow DH. Facial variations related to headform type. Angle Orthod 1985;55:269-80 PUBMED |
29 | Watanabe K, Koga M, Yatabe K, Motegi E, Isshki Y. A morphometric study on setup models of Japanese malocclusions. Shikwa Gakuho 1996;96:209-22 |
30 | Braun S, Hnat WP, Fender DE, Legan HL. The form of the human dental arch. Angle Orthod 1998;68:29-36 PUBMED |
31 | Yun YK, Kook YA, Kim SH, Mo SS, Cha KS, Kim JG, Tae KC. Mandibular clinical arch forms in Koreans with normal occlusions. Korean J Orthod 2004;36:481-7 |
32 | de la Cruz A, Sampson P, Little RM, Artun J, Shapiro PA. Long-term changes in arch form after orthodontic treatment and retention. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107:518-30 DOI ScienceOn |
33 | Miura F, lchijo T, Soma K, Kuroki T, Fukawa T, Maeda M, Tomita K, et al. Dental anthropological study of the Central American Indians. Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi 1989;56:409-28 DOI ScienceOn |
34 | Felton JM, Sinclair PM, Jones DL, Alexander RG. A Computerized analysis of the shape and stability of mandibular arch form. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;92:478-83 DOI ScienceOn |
35 | Sohn BW, Baik HS. Growth and development of arch form. Korean J Orthod 1998;28:17-27 |
36 | Park IC, Bowman D, Klapper L. A cephalometric study of Korean adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthod 1989;96:54-9 DOI ScienceOn |
37 | Shapiro PA. Mandibular dental arch form and dimension: Treatment and postretention changes. Am J Orthod. 1974;66:58-70 DOI ScienceOn |
38 | Siriwat PP, Jarabak JR. Malocclusion and facial morphology is there a relationship? An epidemiologic study. Angle Orthod 1985;55:127-38 PUBMED |