Browse > Article

MnBillnry protraction treatment of skeletal Class III children using miniplnte anchorage  

Cha, Bong-Kuen (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Kangnung University)
Lee, Nam-Ki (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Kangnung University)
Choi, Dong-Soon (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Kangnung University)
Publication Information
The korean journal of orthodontics / v.37, no.1, 2007 , pp. 73-84 More about this Journal
Abstract
The maxillary protraction headgear has been widely used in the treatment of skeletal Class III children with maxillary deficiency. A variety of treatment objectives which allow dentoalveolar movements may be established, but when only maxillary protraction without dentoalveolar movement is needed, one of the limitations in maxillary protraction with conventional tooth-borne anchorage is the loss of dental anchorage. This is because a bone remodeling occurs not only at circummaxillary sutures but also within the periodontal tissues. During protraction treatment in the mixed dentition phase, in older children or for the patient with multiple congenitally missing teeth, it is not uncommon to observe undesirable mesial movement of maxillary teeth. Such a side effect can be eliminated or minimized using absolute anchorage such as skeletal anchorage. The purpose of this case report is to introduce a new technique of the maxillary protraction headgear treatment using surgical miniplates.
Keywords
Miniplates; Skeletal anchorage; Class III malocclusion; Maxillary protraction;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Kim TW, Chang YI, Nahm DS. The retrospective study on the response to the face mask. Kor J Orthod. 1996;26:547-56   과학기술학회마을
2 Hickham JH. Maxillary protraction therapy: diagnosis and treatment. J Clin Orthod 1991;25:102-13   PUBMED
3 Da Silva Filho OG, Ozawa TO, Okada CH, Okada HY, Carvalho RM. Intentional ankylosis of deciduous canines to reinforce maxillary protraction. J Clin Orthod 2003;37:315-20
4 Cha BK, Choi DS. Easy orthodontic treatments of growing children (17): Orthopedic treatments of class III malocclusion using skeletal anchorage. Kor J Dent Clin Orthod. 2006;5:58-65
5 Delaire J, Komposch G. Orthopadische beeinflussung des oberkieferkomplexes. In: Schmuth G editor. Kieferorthopadie I. Munchen: Urban & Schwarzenberg; 1990. p. 253-88
6 Jackson GW, Kokich VG, Shapiro PA. Experimental and postexperimental response to anteriorly directed extraoral force in young Macaca nemestrina. Am J Orthod 1979;75:318-33   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Hwang CJ, Kyong SH, Lim JK. The effect of maxillary protraction appliance treatment in skeletal class III malocclusion patients. 1994;24:851-60
8 Baccetti T, McGill JS, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr., Tollaro I. Skeletal effects of early treatment of Class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion and face-mask therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:333-43   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Choi DS. Treatments of skeletal class III malocclusion patients in growing childeren using surgical method. Dent Clin. 2005;290:1194-1201
10 Menvin D, Ngan P, Hagg U, Yiu C, Wei SH. Timing for effective application of anteriorly directed orthopedic force to the maxilla. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;112:292-9   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Kokich VG, Shapiro PA, Oswald R Koskinen-Moffett L, Clarren SK. Ankylosed teeth as abutments for maxillary protraction: a case report. Am J Orthod 1985;88:303-7   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Lee Hs, Cha BK, Computed tomography of bone thickness of infrazygomatic crest in skeletal class III malocclusion patients in growing childeren. Kangnung University Master's Thesis. 2006
13 Baik HS. Clinical results of the maxillary protraction in Korean children. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;108:583-92   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Cha BK, Park YW, Lee NK, Lee YH. The new two methods of maxillary protraction treatment: Intentional ankylosis and distraction osteogenesis. Kor J Den Asso. 2000;38:997-1007
15 Smalley WM, Shapiro PA, Hohl TH, Kokich VG, Branernark PI. Osseointegrated titanium implants for maxillofacial protraction in monkeys. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;94:285-95   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Petit H. Adaptation following accelerated facial-mask therapy. In: McNamara JA Jr, Ribbens KA, Howe RP editors. Clinical alteration of the growing face. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan; 1983. p. 253-89
17 Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. The cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Semin Orthod 2005;11:119-29   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Hata S, ltoh T, Nakagawa M, Kamogashira K, Ichikawa K, Matsumoto M, Chaconas SJ. Biomechanical effects of maxillary protraction on the craniofacial complex. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;91:305-11   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Lee YJ, Cha KS, Lee JW. Skeletal change on the response of maxillary protraction in skeletal class III malocclusion patients. Kor J Orthod. 1998;28:533-46
20 Kapust AJ, Sinclair PM, Turley PK. Cephalometric effects of face mas/expansion therapy in Class III children: a comparison of three age groups. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:204-12   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
21 Kircelli BH, Pektas ZO, Uckan S. Orthopedic protraction with skeletal anchorage in a patient with maxillary hypoplasia and hypodontia. Angle Orthod 2006;76:156-63   PUBMED