1 |
Kusy RP, Whitley JQ. Coefficients of friction for arch wires in stainless steel and polycrystalline alumina bracket slots, I: the dry state. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990:98:300-12
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Redlich M, Mayer Y, Harari D, Lewinstein I. In vitro study of frictional forces during sliding mechanics of 'reduced-friction' brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003:124:69-73
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Riley JL, Evaluation of frictional forces with plastic and metal edgewise brackets ligate with stainless steel ties and plastic modules, [Thesis] Richmond: Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Dentistry; 1977
|
4 |
Weiss L. Frictional characteristics of esthetic bracket in sliding mechanics. [Thesis.] Toronto: Department of Orthodontics, University of Toronto; 1993
|
5 |
Articolo LC, Kusy RP, Influence of angulation on the resistance to sliding in fixed appliances, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115:39-51
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
이원유, 임경수. 교정용 Resin bracket의 마찰 저항력에 관한 연구. 대치교정지 1999;29:107-12
|
7 |
Tanne K. Matsubara S, Shibaguchi T, Sakuda M. Wire friction from ceramic brackets during simulated canine retraction. Angle Orthod 1991;61:285-90
|
8 |
Saunders CR, Kusy RP. Surface modification methodologies for polycrystallinc alumina: effects on morphology and frictional coefficients. J Mater Sci: Mater in Med 1993;4:422-30
DOI
|
9 |
Kusy RP, Whitley JQ. Friction between different wire-bracket configurations and materials. Semin Orthod 1997;3:166-77
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Springate SD, Winchester LJ, An evaluation of zirconium oxide brackets: a preliminary laboratory and clinical report. Br J Orthod 1991;18:203-9
DOI
|
11 |
Thorstenson GA, Kusy RP. Effect of arch wire size and material on the resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry state. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002:122:295-305
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Dickson J, Jones S. Frictional characteristics of a modified ceramic bracket. J Clin Orthod 1996:30:516-8
|
13 |
Bazakidou E, Nanda RS, Duncanson MG Jr, Sinha P, Evaluation of frictional resistance in esthetic brackets, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;112:138-44
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Thorstenson GA, Kusy RP. Resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets versus conventional stainless steel twin brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet (saliva) states. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120:361-70
DOI
ScienceOn
|
15 |
Kusy RP, Keith O, Whitley JQ, Saunders CR. Coefficient of friction characterization of surface-modified polycrvstalline alumina. J Am Ceram Soc 1993;76:336-42
DOI
|
16 |
Kemp DW. A comparative analysis of frictional forces between self-ligating and conventional edgewise orthodontic brackets. [Thesis.] Toronto: Department of Orthodontics, University of Toronto; 1992
|
17 |
Pratten DH, Popli K, Germane N, Gunsolley JC. Frictional resistance of ceramic and stainless steel orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990:98:398-403
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Tanne K, Matsubara S, Hotei Y, Sakuda M, Yoshida M. Frictional forces and surface topography of a new ceramic bracket. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994:106:273-8
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Ireland AJ, Sherriff M, McDonald F. Effect of bracket and wire composition on frictional forces. Eur J of Orthod 1991:13:322-8
DOI
ScienceOn
|
20 |
Thorstenson GA, Kusy RP. Effects of ligation type and method on the resistance to sliding of novel orthodontic brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet states. Angle Orthod 2003;73:418-30
|
21 |
Thorstenson GA, Kusy RP. Comparison of resistance to sliding between different self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and saliva states. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002:121:472-82
DOI
ScienceOn
|
22 |
Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Scribante A, Klersy C, Auricchio F. Evaluation of friction of conventional and metal-insert ceramic brackets in various bracket-arch wire combinations, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:403-9
DOI
ScienceOn
|
23 |
Peterson L, Spencer R, Andreasen G. A comparison of friction resistance for Nitinol and stainless steel wire in edgewise brackets. Quintessence Int 1982;13:563-71
|
24 |
Nishio C, da Motta AF, Elias CN, Mucha JN. In vitro evaluation of frictional forces between arch wires and ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125:56-64
DOI
ScienceOn
|
25 |
Cash A, Curtis R, Carrigia-Majo D, McDonald F. A comparative study of the static and kinetic frictional resistance of titanium molybdenum alloy arch wires in stainless steel brackets. Eur J Orthod 2004;26:105-11
DOI
ScienceOn
|
26 |
Kapur R, Sinha PK, Nanda RS. Comparison of frictional resistance in titanium and stainless steel brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999:116:271-4
DOI
ScienceOn
|
27 |
Bednar JR, Gruendeman GW, Sandrik JL, A comparative study of frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and arch wires. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;100:513-22
DOI
ScienceOn
|
28 |
Tanne K, Matsubara S, Shibaguchi T, Sakuda M. Wire friction from ceramic brackets during simulated canine retraction. Angle Orthod 1991;61:285-90; discussion 291-2
|
29 |
Yamaguchi K, Nanda RS, Morimoto N, Oda Y. A study of force application, amount of retarding force, and bracket width in sliding mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996:109:50-6
DOI
ScienceOn
|
30 |
Kusy RP, Whitley JQ. Influence of arch wire and bracket dimensions on sliding mechanics: derivations and determinations of the critical contact angles for binding. Eur J Orthod 1999:21:199-208
DOI
ScienceOn
|
31 |
Braun S, Bluestein M, Moore BK, Benson G. Friction in perspective. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115:619-27
DOI
ScienceOn
|