1 |
Lundstrom AA. Size of teeth and jaws in twins. Br Dent J 1964 : 117 : 321-6
|
2 |
Wylie WL. The assessment of anteroposterior dysplasia. Angle Orthod 1947: 17: 97-109
|
3 |
Coben SE. The integration of facial skeletal variants. Am J Orthod 1955: 41 : 407-34
|
4 |
Koo JH, Lee KS. Correlation between mesiodistal crown diameters of permanent teeth. Korean J Orthod 1981 : 11 : 143-50
|
5 |
Trpkova B, Major P, Prasad N, Nebbe B. Cephalometric landmarks identification and reproducibility: A Meta analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1997 : 112 : 165-70
|
6 |
Sim EJ, Hwang HS, Moon JD. A study on the error of tooth size measurements. Korean J Orthod 1999 : 29 : 491-501
|
7 |
Manfredi C, Martina R, Grossi GB, Giuliani M. Heritability of 39 orthodontic cephalometric parameters on MZ,DZ twins and MN-paired singletons. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1997 : 111 : 44-51
|
8 |
Radnzic D. Dental crowding and its relationship to mesiodistal crown diameters and arch dimensions. Am J Orthod Dentofa Orthop 1988 : 94 : 50-6
|
9 |
Svinhufvud E, Myllarniemi S, Norio R. Dominant inheritance of tooth malpositions andtheir association to hypodontial. Clin Genet 1988 : 34: 373-81
|
10 |
Burstone CJ, James RB, Legan H, Murphy GA, Norton LA. Cephalometrics for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg 1978 : 36 : 269-77
|
11 |
Bishara SE. Compensatory development interactions in the size of permanent teeth in three contemporary populations. Angle Orthod 1989: 2 : 107-12
|
12 |
Hunter WS, Priest WR. Errors and Discrepancies in Measurement of Tooth size. J Dent Res 1960 : 39 : 405-14
|
13 |
McNamara JA Jr. A method of cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod 1984 : 86 : 449-69
|
14 |
Oh JS, Yoon JH, Kook YA, Kim SC. A study on the skeletal and dentoalveolar dimensions in relation to vertical facial patterns. Korean J Orthod 1999 : 29: 339-47
|
15 |
Sperry TP, Worms FW, Isaacson RJ, Speidel TM. Tooth size discrepancy in mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod 1977 : 72 : 183-90
|
16 |
Kang SH, Nahm OS. Roentgenocephalometric study on facial height andocclusal plane inclination in class I malocclusion group. Korean J Orthod 1995 : 25 : 111 -28
|
17 |
Richardson A. An investigation into the reproducibility of some points, planes, and lines used in cephalornetric analysis. Am J Orthod 1966 : 52: 637-51
|
18 |
Tng TT, Chan TC, Hagg U, Cooke MS. Validity of cephalometric landmarks: Anexprimental study on human skulls. Eur J Orthod 1994: 16: 110-20
|
19 |
Harvold EP. The activator in Orthodontics. St Louis: CV Mosby 1974: 307-36
|
20 |
Jung MH, Yang WS. Causitive factors and predictability of arch length discrepancy. Korean J Orthod 1997 : 27 : 457-71
|
21 |
Nahm OS. Dental anthropological study on the occlusal characteristics of the Koreans. Korean J Orthod 1994 : 24 : 247-73
|
22 |
Harzer W. A hypothetical model of genetic control of tooth-crown growth in man. Arch Oral Biol 1987 : 32 : 159-62
|
23 |
Potter RH, Rice JP, Dahlberg AA, Dahlberg T. Dental size traits within families: path analysis for first molar andlateral incisor. Am J Phys Antropol 1983 : 61 : 283-9
|
24 |
Di Paolo RJ, Philip C, Maganzini AL. The quadrilateral analysis: An individualized skeletal assessment. Am J Orthod 1983 : 19-32
|
25 |
Bell WH, Proffit WR, White RP. Surgical Correction of Dentofacial Deformities, Vol I. Philadelphia: WB Saunders 1980: 137-50
|
26 |
King L, Harris EF, Tolley EA. Heritability of cephalometric and occlusal variables as assessed from siblings with overt malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1993 : 104: 121-31
|