Browse > Article

Histological Periodontal Tissue Reaction to Rapid Tooth Movement by periodontal Distraction in Dogs  

Chang, Young-Il (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Kim, Tae-Woo (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Choi, Hee-Young (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
The korean journal of orthodontics / v.32, no.6, 2002 , pp. 455-466 More about this Journal
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the changes that occurred over time in the distracted periodontal ligament space following the rapid retraction of a tooth by periodontal distraction after bone undermining surgery had been conducted in the dogs. The upper second premolars were extracted on the left and right side in 4 male beagle dogs. Immediately after extraction, the interseptal bone distal to the upper first premolar was thinned and undermined by grooving to decrease the bone resistance. Activating an individualized distraction appliance at the rate of 0.225mm twice a day, the upper first premolar was retracted rapidly toward the extraction socket. Periodontal distractions were performed for 5, 10, and 20 days, and 20-day-distraction cases were followed by maintenance periods of 0, 14, 28, and 56 days. After 20 days of rapid retraction, the average distal movement of the upper first premolar was 5.02mm, and the average mesial movement of the upper third premolars serving as an anchorage unit was 0.18 mm. On histological examination, the regeneration of bone occurred in a highly organized pattern. Distracted periodontal ligament space was filled with newly formed bone oriented in the direction of the distraction, and this was followed by extensive bone remodeling. This result was similar to those observed in other bones after distraction osteogenesis. In the periodontal ligament, the relationship between collagen fibers and cementum began to be restored 2 weeks after the distraction was completed, and showed almost normal features 8weeks after the completion of the periodontal distraction. However, on the alveolar side, the new bone formation was still in process and collagen fiber bundles and Sharpey's fibers were not present 8 weeks after the completion of the periodontal distraction. Reactions in the periodontal ligament of the anchorage tooth represented bone resorption on the compressed side and new bone deposition on the tension side as occurred in conventional orthodontic tooth movement. In conclusion, the results of this study showed that periodontal structures on the distracted side of the periodontal ligament were regenerated well histologically following rapid tooth movement.
Keywords
Periodontal distraction; Rapid retraction; Bone undermining surgery;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Storey E. The nature of tooth movement. Am J Orthod 1973 : 63 : 292-314   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Reitan K, Kvam E. Comparative behavior of human and animal tissue during experimental tooth movement. Angle Orthod 1971 : 41 : 1-14
3 Azuma M. Study on histologic changes of periodontal membrane incident to experimental tooth movement. Bull Tokyo Med Dent UniV 1970: 17 : 149-78
4 Liou EJW, Huang S. Rapid canine retraction through distraction of the periodontal ligament. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1998 : 114: 372-82   DOI   ScienceOn
5 QUinn R, Yoshikawa D. A reassessment of force magnitude In orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1985 : 88 : 252-60   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Cope JB, Harper RP, Samchukov ML. Experimental tooth move-ment through regenerate alveolar bone: A pilot study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1999 : 116: 501-5   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Liou EJW. Figueroa AA, Polley JW. Rapid orthodontic tooth mo-vement into newly distracted bone after mandibular distraction osteogenesis in a canine model. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2000 : 117: 391-8   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Karp NS, McCarth JG, Schreiber JS, Sissons HA, Thorne CH. Membranous bone lengthening: A serial histological study. Ann Plast Surg 1992 : 29 : 2-7   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Liou EJW, Polley JW, Figueroa AA. Distraction osteogenesis: The effects of orthodontic tooth movement on distracted mandibular bone. J Craniofac Surg 1998 : 9 : 564-71   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Reitan K. Effects of force magnitude and direction of tooth movement on different alveolar bonetypes. Angle Orthod 1964 : 34: 244-55
11 Deguchi T, Kuroda T, Hunt NP, Graber TM. Long-term appli-cation of chincup force alters the morphology of the dolichofacial Class III mandible. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1999 : 116: 610-15   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Amler MH, Johnson PL, Salman I. Histological and histochemical investigation of human alveolar socket healing In undisturbed extraction wounds. J Am Dent Assoc 1960 : 61 :32-44   DOI
13 Storey E. Tissue response to the movement of bones. Am J Orthod 1973 : 64 : 229-47   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Schudy FF. The vertical dimension of the human face. Houston: D. Armstrong Co.1992
15 Roberts WE, Jee W. Cell kinetics of orthodontically stimulated and non-stimulated periodontal ligament in the rat. Archs Oral Biol 1974: 19: 17-21   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Ten Cate AR. repair and regeneration of dental tissue. In : Ten Cate AR ed. Oral histology-Development, structure, and function. St Louis: CV Mosby, 1994
17 Beertsin W, McCuiloch CAG, Sodec J. The periodontal ligament: a unique, multifunctional connective tissue. Periodontology 2000 1997: 13 : 20-40   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Reitan K. Some factors determining the evaluation of force in orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1957: 43 : 32-45   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Rygh P. Ultrastructural changes In tension zones of rat molar periodontium incident to orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod 1976: 70 : 268-81
20 Komuro Y, Takato T, Harii K, Yonemara Y. The histologic analysis of distraction osteogenesis of the mandible i rabbits. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994 : 94 : 152-9   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Reitan K. Clinical and histological observation on tooth movement during and after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1967 : 53 : 721-45   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Huebash RF, Hansen LS. A histopathologic study of extraction wounds in dogs. Oral Surg, Oral Med & Oral Path 1969: 28 : 187-96   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Haas AJ. Palatal expansion: Just the beginning of dentofacial orthopedics. Am J Orthod 1970 : 57 : 219-55   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Reitan K. Tissue behavior during orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod 1960: 46: 881-900   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Schudy FF. Vertical growth versus anteroposterior growth as rela-ted to function and treatment. Angle Orthod 1964 : 34 : 75-93
26 Ilizarov GA The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissue: II. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction. Clin Orthop 1989 : 239: 263-285
27 Pilon JJGM, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Maltha JC. Magnitude of orthodontic forces and rate of bodily tooth movement. An experimental study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1996 : 110: 16-23   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Claflin RS. Healing of' disturbed and undisturbed extraction wounds. JADA 1936 : 23 : 945
29 DeAngelis V. Observations on the response of alveolar bone to orthodontic force. Am J Orthod 1970: 58 : 284-94   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Boester C, Johnston L. A clinical investigation of the concepts of differential and optimal force in canine retraction. Angle Orthod 1974: 44: 113-9
31 Haas AJ. Rapid expansion of the maxillary dental arch and nasal cavity by opening of the midpalatal suture. Angle Orthod 1961 : 31 : 73-90