1 |
HS Baik. Clinical results of maxillary protraction in Korean children. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995: 108 : 583-592
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Jackson GW, Kokich VG, Shapiro PA. Experimental and postexperimental response to anteriorly directed extraoral force in young Macaca nemsestrina. Am J Orthod 1979 : 75 : 318-333
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Shanker S. Salazar RW, Taliercio EW. et al. Cephalometric A point changes during and after maxillary protraction and expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1996 : 110 : 423-430
DOI
ScienceOn
|
4 |
Schudy FF. Vertical growth versus anteroposterior growth as rela-ted to function and treatment. Angle Orthod 1964 : 34 : 75-93
|
5 |
Bjrk A, Skieller V. Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible, A synthesis of longitudinal studies over a period of 25years. Eur J Orthod 1984: 6 : 1-14
|
6 |
Issacson JR, Issacson RJ, Spiedel TM, Worms FW, Extreme variation in vertical facial growth and associated variations in skeletal and dental relations Angle Orthod 1971 : 41 : 219-29
|
7 |
Moller E. The chewing apparatus. An electromyographic study of the action of the muscles of mastication and Its correlation to facial morphology, Acta Physiol Scand 69 : Supp. 1966 : 280 : 1-229
|
8 |
HS Baik. Clinical effects and stability of the maxillary protraction usion the lateral cephalogram in Korea. Korean J Orthod. 1992 : 22: 509-26
|
9 |
William R. Proffit. Contemporary orthodontics. St Louis: Mosby, 2000
|
10 |
Oppenheim A. A possibility for physiologic orthodontic movement, Am. J. Orthod., 1944 : 30 : 345-368
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Sassouni V, Nanda S, Analysis of dentofacial vertical proportions. Am J Orthod 1964 : 50 : 801-823
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Ngan PW, Hagg U, Yiu C, Wei SH, Treatment response and long-term dentotacial adaptations to maxillary expansion and protraction. Semin Orthod 1997: 3 : 255-64
DOI
ScienceOn
|
13 |
Schendel SA, Eisenfeld J, Bell WH, Epker BN, The long face syndrome:vertical maxillary excess. Am J Orthod 1976 : 70 : 398-408
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
JH Kim, Viana MA, Graber TM, Omerza FF, BeGole EA, The effectiveness of protraction face mask therapy:a meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1999 : 115: 675-85
DOI
ScienceOn
|
15 |
Sugawara J, Asano T, Endo N, Mitani H. Long term effects of chin cap therapy on skeletal profile in mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1990: 98 : 127-33
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Ingervall B, Thuer U, Kuster R, lack of correlation between mouth breathing andbiteforce. Eur J Orthod 1989 : 11 : 43-46
DOI
|
17 |
Graber LW. Chincup therapy for mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod 1977: 72: 23-41
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Chong YH, Ive JC, Artun J. Changes following the use of pro-traction headgear for early correction of Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1996 : 66 : 351-362
|
19 |
Irie M, Nakamura S. Orthopedic approach to severe skeletal Class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod 1975: 67 : 377-392
DOI
ScienceOn
|
20 |
Ueda HM, Miyamoto K, Saiffuddin, Ishizuka Y, Tanne K. Masticatory muscle activity in children and adults with different facial types. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2000 : 118: 63-68
DOI
ScienceOn
|
21 |
Deguchi T, Kuroda T, Hunt NP, Graber TM, Long-term applica-tion of chincup force alters the morphology of the dolichofacial Class III mandible. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1999 : 116: 610-615
DOI
ScienceOn
|
22 |
Opdebeeck H, Bell WHo The short face symcrorne. Am J Orthod 1978 : 73 : 499-511
DOI
ScienceOn
|
23 |
Houston WJ, The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod 1983: 83 : 382-90
DOI
PUBMED
ScienceOn
|
24 |
Cozzani G. Extraoral traction and Class III treatment. Am J Orthod 1981 : 80 : 638-650
DOI
ScienceOn
|
25 |
Proffit WR, Fields HW. Occlusal forces In normal and long-face adults. J Dent Res 1983 : 62 : 571-4
DOI
ScienceOn
|
26 |
Ricketts RM. Planning treatment on the basis of the facial pattern and an estrmate of its growth. Angle Orthod 1957 : 27 : 14-37
|
27 |
Schudy FF. The vertical dimension of the human face. Houston: D. Armstrong Co. 1992
|
28 |
Suda N, Lshit-Suzu Kim, Hirose K, et al. Effective treatment plan for maxillary protraction: Is the boneage useful to determine the treatment plan? Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2000 : 118: 5562
|
29 |
Kambara T. Dentofacial changes produced by extraoral forward force in Macaca irus. Am J Orthod 1977 : 71 : 249-277
DOI
ScienceOn
|
30 |
Saadia M, Torres E. Sagittal changes after maxillary protraction in Class III patients in the primary, mixed and late mixed dentitions. Am J Orthod Dentolac Orthop 2000 : 117 : 669-680
DOI
|
31 |
Bjork A. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation, Am J Orthod 1969 : 55 : 585-99
DOI
PUBMED
ScienceOn
|
32 |
Siriwat PP, Jarabak JR. Malocclusion and facial morphology: Is there a relationship? Angle Orthod 1985 : 55 : 127-38
|
33 |
HS Baik, KH Kim, Y Park. The distribution and trends in malocclusion patients: a 10 year study of 2155 patients from YDSH. Korean J Orthod. 1995: 25: 87-100
|
34 |
Merwin D, Ngan P, Hagg U, Yiu C, Wei SH. Timing for effective application of anteriorly directed orthopedic force to the maxilla. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1997 : 112 : 292-299
DOI
ScienceOn
|