Browse > Article

Upper and lower second premolar extraction treatment case - Treatment strategy for Class III borderline cases  

Kim, Tae-Kyung (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Kim, Jong-Tae (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Yang, Won-Sik (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
The korean journal of orthodontics / v.32, no.3, 2002 , pp. 185-194 More about this Journal
Abstract
When treating borderline cases which have mild crowding, non-extraction treatment may be considered firstly. But crowding may be reappeared by relapse and it may have problems in esthetics and stability. Secondarily four first premolar extraction treatment may be considered. But this may cause dish-in face by overretracting anterior teeth. In this cases, extraction of four second premolar is preferred because this resolves crowding without aggravating profile and has good stability after treatment. So we review cases treated by four second premolar extraction which show good treatment results and stability. The patients had good profile, Class I molar relationship, mild crowding and skeletal discrepancy and their growth had almost completed.
Keywords
Dish-in face; Secoud Premolar extraction; Borderline case;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Keedy RL. Indications and contra-indications for extraction in ortho-dontic treatment. Angle Orthod 1956 : 26 : 243-9
2 Schope RJ. An analysis of second premolar extraction procedure. Am J Orthod 1964 : 34 : 292-304
3 김태경, 양원식, 제일소구치 또는 제이소구치 발거가 안면수직고경에 미치는 영항. 서울치대논문집 2000 : 42: 202-4
4 Dewel BF. Second premolar extractions in orthodontics : principles, procedures and case analysis. Am J Orthod 1955 : 41 : 107-20   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Carey CW. Diagnosis and case analysis in orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1952 : 38 : 149-61   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Graber TM. Orthodontics : principles and practice, Philadelphia: WE Sanders Company, 1966
7 Nance HN. The removal of second premolars in orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1949 : 35 : 685-95   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Schwab DT. The borderline patient and tooth removal. Am J Orthod 1971 : 59 : 126~145   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
9 Levy PH. Clinical implications of mandibular repositioning and the concept of alterable centric relation. lnt J Orthod 1979 : 17 : 6-25
10 Brandt S and Safirstem GR. Different extractions for different malocclusions. Am J Orthod. 1975 : 68 : 15-41   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Salzmann JA. Practice of orthodontics, Philadelphia ' JB Lippincott Company, 1966
12 De Castro N. Second premolar extraction in clinical practice. Am J Orthod 1974: 65 : 115-36
13 Tulley WJ, The role of extractions in orthodontic treatment. Br Dent J 1959 : 107: 199-205
14 Logan LR. Second premolar extraction in Class I and Class II. Am J Orthod 1973: 63 : 115-47   DOI   ScienceOn