Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.20220011

Development of evaluation criteria for dental hygiene intra-school clinical practice operation using CIPP evaluation model  

Jang, Mi-Hwa (Department of Dental Hygiene, Suwon Women's University)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean society of Dental Hygiene / v.22, no.2, 2022 , pp. 93-105 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to develop operation management evaluation standards for efficient operation of practical courses conducted on campus and to verify validity and reliability. Methods: The draft evaluation criteria of this study were derived based on the CIPP program evaluation model, in order to verify the validity of the content, the Delphi survey was conducted targeting 30 dental hygiene professors and clinical field dental hygienists who had been in charge of practical education for more than 5 years. Main survey was conducted with 252 professors and clinical field dental hygienists in charge of practical education. Results: Through exploratory factor analysis, a total of 36 questions were confirmed with 7 factors. As a result of verifying the internal consistency of the final evaluation criteria, the degree of internal fit of the items in the entire domain was 0.914. Conclusions: According to the above results, the validity and reliability of the evaluation criteria for evaluating the operation and management of in-school clinical practice were verified to be appropriate, and it is thought that it can be used in follow-up studies related to the operation and management of the practice course in the future.
Keywords
CIPP evaluation mode; Dental hygiene clinical practice; Development of evaluation criteria; Operational evaluation;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Mann NK, Sellers PA. Survey for teaching patient education in the dental hygiene curriculum. J Dent Hyg 2003;77(3):168-72.
2 Hwang GH, Kim KJ, Ohn JD, Chun YY. Exploring the meaning of total quality management of curriculum and its implications. J Educ Stud 2013;44(4):99-121.
3 Stufflebeam DL. The relevance of the CIPP evaluation model for educational account ability. J Res and Development in Educ(JRDE) 1971;5(1):19-25.
4 Sim SJ, Back HO, Um JS, Jung HY, Ji HM, Hwang SN, et al. The factors to impact on the satisfaction of field practice among dental hygiene students. J Kor Acad Dent Admin 2017;5(1):22-30. https://doi.org/10.22671/JKADA.2017.5.1.22   DOI
5 Lee YS. Effects of problem - based instruction on learning attitude and academic achievement by learner's cognitive style attitude[Master's thesis]. Chungju: Univ. of Education Chungju National, 2002.
6 Kim ME. Cognitive and affective domains outcome of students in the department of dental hygiene according to teaching and learning methods by learning style. Jour of KoCon.a 2021;21(1):363-72. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2021.21.01.363   DOI
7 Park IS, Song GS. Effect of cooperative learning on learning strategies, academic self - efficacy and class satisfaction among dental hygiene students. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg 2012;12(1):93-101. https://doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.2012.12.1.093   DOI
8 Floyd FJ, Widaman KF. Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychol Assess 1995;7(3):286-99. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.286   DOI
9 Korea Dental Hygiene Education and Evaluation Institute Establishment Promotion Committee. Public hearing for establishment of dentalhygiene education evaluation and certification system. Korean Dental Hygienists Association 2017.
10 Bae HS. Theory - driven educational program evaluation. Seoul: Wonmisa; 2008: 1-163.
11 Shin YJ, Kim ST, Song HD. Development of evaluation indicators for job capability strengthening program for vocational high school with application of CIPP evaluation model. J Vocational Educ Res 2018;37(3):1-23. https://doi.org/10.37210/JVER.2018.37.3.1   DOI
12 Kwon JS, Kim HY, Yune SJ. Developing Korean LID program assessment criterion based on CIPP evaluation model. JOEC 2019;25(4):51-72. https://doi.org/10.24159/joec.2019.25.4.51   DOI
13 Jang MH, Kim JH. Influencing factors on attitude, stress and satisfaction in clinical practice. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg 2014;14(3):407-15. https://doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.2014.14.03.407   DOI
14 Cha BE, Shon MH. A study on the development of evaluation indicators for the education process in medical school. JOEC 2019;25(4):239-61. https://doi.org/10.24159/joec.2019.25.4.239   DOI
15 Yun MH, Kim JW, Kim HH, Park SS. Evaluation of industry-university cooperation internship programs. J Vocational Educ Res 2006;25(3):183-206.
16 Kang JN, Park KO, Chang YJ. Development of evaluation indicators on hospice and palliative care curriculum using delphi methods. KJHRDQ 2013;15(1):107-34. https://doi.org/10.18211/kjhrdq.2013.15.1.005   DOI
17 Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res 1986;5(6):382-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017   DOI
18 Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate data analysis. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River NJ: Prentice Hall; 2010: 91-146.
19 Kaiser HF. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 1974;39(1):31-6.   DOI
20 Uysal MS, Sirakaya - Turk E. Factor analytical procedure and scale reliability. Boston: CABI; 2017: 320-38.
21 Field A. Exploratory factor analysis. In: discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. London: Sage; 2013: 670-8.
22 Taichman RS, Green TG, Polverini PJ. Creation of a scholars program in dental leadership(SPDL) for dental and dental hygiene students. J Dent Educ 2009;73(10):1139-43. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2009.73.10.tb04805.x   DOI
23 Bae GM, Wu HJ, Choi ML, Yoon GS. Diagnosis and improvements plan study of CIPP model - based vocational competency development training teacher qualification training. J Vocational Educ Res 2017;36(2):1-27. https://doi.org/10.37210/JVER.2017.36.2.51   DOI
24 Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers Psychol 1975;28(4):563-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x   DOI