Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.2012.12.6.1082

Comparison of the accuracy of digital models made from white light scanner by scanning method  

Kim, Ki-Baek (Department of health science specialized in Dental Lab. Science & Engineering, Graduate school, Korea University)
Lee, Gyeong-Tak (Department of health science specialized in Dental Lab. Science & Engineering, Graduate school, Korea University)
Kim, Jae-Hong (Department of health science specialized in Dental Lab. Science & Engineering, Graduate school, Korea University)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean society of Dental Hygiene / v.12, no.6, 2012 , pp. 1082-1089 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objectives : The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of digitized stone models, impression materials compared to the master model and the reliability of the computer aided analysis. Methods : A master model(500B-1, Nissin dental product, Japan) with the prepared lower full arch tooth was used. Ten vinyl polysiloxane impressions(Examix$^{(R)}$, GC Industrial Corp, Japan) of master model were taken and type IV stone(aesthetic-base gold$^{(R)}$, Dentona, Germany) were poured in stone models. The linear distance between the reference points were measured and analyzed on the Delcam Copycad$^{(R)}$(Delcam plc, UK). The t-student test for paired samples was used for statistical analysis. Results : The mean differences to master model for stone model and impression material were 0.11~0.19mm, and 0.19~0.29mm, respectively. There were statistical differences in dimensional accuracy for full arch impression between master model and stone model/impressions(p<.05). Conclusions : Two different scanning methods showed clinically acceptable accuracy of full arch digital impression produced by them. These results will have to be confirmed in further clinical studies.
Keywords
accuracy; digital model; impression material; scanning method; stone model;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Spikermann H, Anusavice KJ. Marginal fit of alumina-and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system. Oper Dent 2001;26(4):367-374.
2 Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J 2009;28(1):44-56.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Christensen GJ. Impressions are changing: deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling. J Am Dent Assoc 2009;140(10):1301-1304.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Rekow ED. High-technology innovations and limitations for restorative dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 1993;37(3):513-524.
5 Christensen GJ. The state of fixed prosthodontics impressions: room for improvement. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;136(3):343-346.
6 Finger W, Ohsawa M. Effect of mixing ratio on properties of elastomeric dental impression materials. Dent Mater 1986;2(4):183-186.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Shigeto N, Murata H, Hamada T. Evaluation of the methods for dislodging the impression tray affecting the dimensional accuracy of the abutments in complete dental arch cast. J Prothet Dent 1989;61(1):54-58.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Gerrow JD, Schneider RL. A comparison of the compatibility of elastomeric impression materials, type IV dental stones, and liquid media. J Prothet Dent 1987;57(3):292-298.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Ciesco JN, Malone WF, Sandrik JL, Mazur B. Comparison of elastomeric impression materials used in fixed prosthodontics J Prothet Dent 1981;45(1):89-94.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 American Dental Association. Council on dental materals, ANSI/ADA specification No. 25 for Dental Gypsum Products. Chicago:Am Dent Assoc; 1987:640-644.
11 Millstein PL. Determining the accuracy of gypsum casts made from type IV dental stone. J Oral Rehabil 1992;19(3):239-243.   DOI
12 Custer F, Updegrove L, Ward M. Accuracy and dimensional stability of a silicone rubber base impression material. J Prothet Dent 1964;14(6): 1115-1121.   DOI
13 Persson AS, Oden A, Andersson M, Sandborgh- Englund G. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: Virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness. Dent mater 2009;25(7): 929-936.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Quaas S, Rudolph H, Luthardt RG. Direct mechanical data acquisition of dental impressions for the manufacturing of CAD/CAM restorations. J Dent 2007;35(12):903-908.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Mehl A, Gloger W, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. A new optical 3D device for the detection of wear. J Dent Res 1997;76(11):1799-1807.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Creed B, Chung HK, Jeryl DE, James JX, Lee A. Comparison of the accuracy of linear measurement obtained from cone beam computerized tomography images and digital models. Semin Orthod 2011;17(2): 49-56.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Delong R, Heinzen M, Hodges JS, Ko CC, Douglas WH. Accuracy of a system for creating 3D computer models of dental arches. J Dent Res 2003;82(6):438-442.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 May KB, Russell MM, Razzoog ME, Lang BR. Precision of fit: the Procera AllCeram crown. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80(4):394-404.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 2008;204(9):505-511.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Kuroda T, Motohashi N, Tominaga R, Iwata K. Three-dimensional dental cast analyzing system using laser scanning. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110(4):365-369.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Motohashi N, Kuroda T. A 3D computer-aided design system applied to diagnosis and treatment planning in orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. Eur J Orthod 1999;21(3):263-274.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Santoro M, Galkin S, Teredesai M, Nicolay OF, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of measurements made on digital and plster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124(1):101-105.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Zilberman O, Huggare JA, Parikakis KA. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three - dimensional virtual orthodontic models. Angle Orthod 2003;73(3):301-306.
24 Stevens DR, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, et al. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129(6):794-803.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Quimby ML, Vig KW, Rashid RG, Firestone AR. The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models. Angle Orthod 2004;74(3):298-303.