Browse > Article

Effect of two dentin desensitizers and Er,Cr:YSGG laser for dentinal tubule occlusion  

Kim, Na-Song (Department of esthetic restorative dentistry, Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry at Korea University)
Kang, Jeong-Kyung (Department of esthetic restorative dentistry, Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry at Korea University)
Ryu, Jae-Jun (Department of esthetic restorative dentistry, Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry at Korea University)
Publication Information
The Journal of the Korean dental association / v.48, no.6, 2010 , pp. 469-477 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of two dentin desensitizers and Er,Cr:YSGG laser for dentinal tubule occlusion. Twenty recently extracted single-rooted human teeth were used to obtain root dentinal fragments. The crowns were cut approximately 1mm below the cementum enamel junction(CEJ). A second cut was used to remove the apex of the root. Subsequently, a longitudinal cut was made in order to obtain 2 fragments from each root sample. The cementum from the cervical portion was removed using a high-speed diamond-coated bur in order to expose the dentin. To open dentinal tubules, forty samples were treated with 50% citric acid for 2 min and then rinsed under distilled water for 1 min. These were divided into four groups of ten samples each. The first group served as a control group. In group 2, the samples were irradiated with the Er,Cr:YSGG laser(Waterlase MD, Biolase, USA). In group 3, the samples were treated with Bisblock and ONE-STEP PLUS(Bisco, USA). In group 4, the samples were treated with Gluma comfort bond & Desensitizer(Heraeus Kulzer, Germany). All the samples were examined using Scanning electron microscopy(Hitachi, S-4700, Japan) with two different magnifications(X2000, X5000). These images were assessed by one examiner who was blind to the experimental procedure, using the index of smear layer removal. The distribution of smear layer removal grades was tested using Fisher's exact test. On the order hand, in order to evaluate the occluding effect of two dentin desensitizers and Er,Cr:YSGG laser, the number of exposed dentinal tubules was counted in each group. These were evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis test with significance predetermined $\alpha$=0.05. There were statistically significant differences between the three groups(Er,Cr:YSGG laser, Bisblock+ONE-STEP PLUS, Gluma comfort bond & Desensitizer) and control group.
Keywords
Dentinal tublue occlusion; Er,Cr:YSGG laser; Bisblock and ONE-STEP PLUS; Gluma comfort bond & Desensitizer; Scanning electron microscopy;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Brannstrom, M. and G. Johnson : The sensory mechanism in human dentin as revealed by evaporation and mechanical removal of dentin. J Dent Res, 57(1):49-53, 1978   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Suge, T., et al. : Effects of fluoride on the calcium phosphate precipitation method for dentinal tubule occlusion. J Dent Res, 74(4):1079-85, 1995   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Ladalardo, T.C., et al. : Laser therapy in the treatment of dentine hypersensitivity. Braz Dent J, 15(2):144-50, 2004   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Gillam, D.G., N.J. Mordan, and H.N. Newman : The Dentin Disc surface : aplausible model for dentin physiology and dentin sensitivity evaluation. Adv Dent Res, 11(4):487-501, 1997   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Dondi dall'Orologio, G., et al. : Dentin desensitizing effects of Gluma Alternate, Health-Dent Desensitizer and Scotchbond Multi-Purpose. Am J Dent, 12(3):103-6, 1999
6 Bergenholtz, G., et al. : Inhibition of serum albumin flux across exposed dentine following conditioning with GLUMA primer, glutaraldehyde or potassium oxalates. J Dent, 21(4):220-7, 1993   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Felton, D.A., G. Bergenholtz, and B.E. Kanoy : Evaluation of the desensitizing effect of Gluma Dentin Bond on teeth prepared for completecoverage restorations. Int J Prosthodont, 4(3):292-8, 1991
8 Santiago, S.L., J.C. Pereira, and A.C. Martineli : Effect of commercially available and experimental potassium oxalate-base dentin desensitizing agents in dentin permeability : influence of time and filtration system. Braz Dent J, 17(4):300-5, 2006   DOI
9 Sauro, S., et al. : The influence of soft acidic drinks in exposing dentinal tubules after non-surgical periodontal treatment : a SEM investigation on the protective effects of oxalate-containing phytocomplex. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, E542-8, 2007
10 Lan, W.H. and H.C. Liu : Treatment of dentin hypersensitivity by Nd:YAG laser. J Clin Laser Med Surg, 14(2):89-92, 1996
11 한지영, 이만섭, 박준봉, 허익 : EDTA가 치근면 탈회에 미치는 효과에 대한 주사현미경적 연구. 대한치주과학회지, 29(4):847-863, 1999
12 Ishi, E.P., et al. : Smear layer removal and collagen fiber exposure using tetracycline hydrochloride conditioning. J Contemp Dent Pract, 9(5):25-33, 2008
13 Walters, P.A. : Dentinal hypersensitivity : a review. J Contemp Dent Pract, 6(2):107-17, 2005
14 Sampaio, J.E., et al. : Effectiveness of EDTA and EDTA-Tbrushing on ther emoval of root surface smear layer. Pesqui Odontol Bras, 17(4):319-25, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
15 권순영, 임성빈, 정진형 : 수종의 치근면 처치 방법에 따른 상아질 지각 과민 변화 및 표면 특성에 관한 연구. 대한치주과학회지, 29(1):51-63, 1999
16 Jacobsen, P.L. and G. Bruce : Clinical dentin hypersensitivity : understanding the causes and prescribing a treatment. J Contemp Dent Pract, 2(1):1-12, 2001
17 Schiff, T., et al. : Efficacy and safety of a novel stabilized stannous fluoride and sodium hexametaphosphate dentifrice for dentinal hypersensitivity. J Contemp Dent Pract, 7(2):1-8, 2006
18 Orchardson, R. and D.G. Gillam : Managing dentin hypersensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc, 137(7):990-8;quiz1028-9, 2006   DOI
19 Ritter, A.V., et al. : Treating cervical dentin hypersensitivity with fluoride varnish : a randomized clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc, 137(7):1013-20;quiz1029, 2006   DOI
20 Prati, C., et al. : Treatment of cervical dentin hypersensitivity with resin adhesives : 4-week evaluation. Am J Dent, 14(6):378-82, 2001
21 Olusile, A.O., et al. : Short-term clinical evaluation off our desensitizing agents. J Contemp Dent Pract, 9(1):22-9, 2008
22 Pashley, D.H., et al. : The use of oxalate to reduce dentin permeability under adhesive restorations. Am J Dent, 14(2):89-94, 2001