Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2022.22.4.239

Anesthetic efficacies of buccal with palatal injection versus buccal with intra-septal injection in permanent maxillary first molars of pediatric patients  

Areenoo, Peecharat (Division of Pediatric Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University)
Manmontri, Chanika (Division of Pediatric Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University)
Chaipattanawan, Nattakan (Division of Pediatric Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University)
Chompu-inwai, Papimon (Division of Pediatric Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University)
Khanijou, Manop (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Bangkokthonburi University)
Kumchai, Thongnard (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Bangkokthonburi University)
Wongsirichat, Natthamet (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Bangkokthonburi University)
Publication Information
Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine / v.22, no.4, 2022 , pp. 239-254 More about this Journal
Abstract
The high success rate of dental treatment is dependent on the cooperation of pediatric patients during procedures. Dental treatment often causes pain, particularly in children. The factors in providing treatment to pediatric patients include the characteristics and location of the tooth, profoundness of the anesthesia including the type of local anesthetic, and cooperation of the patient. Previous studies have examined several techniques to successfully achieve profound pulpal anesthesia in maxillary permanent teeth. The dentist should select the injection technique to be used based on patient needs. In children, either buccal with palatal injections or buccal with intra-septal injections may be used to anesthetize the permanent maxillary first molar. Buccal with palatal injections are commonly used prior to routine maxillary dental procedures. Currently, there are only a few studies on the employment of buccal with intra-septal injections to anesthetize permanent maxillary first molars in pediatric patients. This review will focus on efficacy of buccal with palatal versus buccal with intra-septal pulpal anesthesia of the permanent maxillary first molars in pediatric patients and aim to determine which technique should be used during routine dental procedures.
Keywords
Intra-septal Injection; Maxillary Buccal Injection; Palatal Injection; Pediatric Patients; Permanent Maxillary First Molars;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Webster S Jr, Drum M, Reader A, Fowler S, Nusstein J, Beck M. How effective is supplemental intraseptal anesthesia in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis? J Endod 2016; 42: 1453-7.   DOI
2 Dianat O, Mozayeni MA, Layeghnejad MK, Shojaeian S. The efficacy of supplemental intraseptal and buccal infiltration anesthesia in mandibular molars of patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. Clin Oral Investig 2020; 24: 1281-6.   DOI
3 Cassetta M, Sofan AA, Altieri F, Barbato E. Evaluation of alveolar cortical bone thickness and density for orthodontic mini-implant placement. J Clin Exp Dent 2013; 5: e245-52.
4 Roberts WE, Huja SS. Bone physiology, metabolism, and biomechanics in orthodontic practice. Orthodontics: Current principles and techniques. 6th ed. St. Louis, Mosby. 2016, pp99-153.
5 McDonald RE, Avery DR, Dean JA. Dentistry for the child and adolescent. St. Louis, Mosby. 2004.
6 Alasmari AA, Aldossari GS, mohAmmed S. Dental anxiety in children: A review of the contributing factors. J Clin Diagn Res 2018; 12: 1-3   DOI
7 Sreekumar K, Bhargava D. Comparison of onset and duration of action of soft tissue and pulpal anesthesia with three volumes of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine in maxillary infiltration anesthesia. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 15: 195-9.   DOI
8 Badenoch-Jones EK, Lincoln T. Palatal injection for removal of maxillary teeth: is it required? A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 45: 1283-92.   DOI
9 Jafarzadeh H, Abbott PV. Review of pulp sensibility tests. Part I: general information and thermal tests. Int Endod J. 2010; 43: 738-62.   DOI
10 Fuss Z, Trowbridge H, Bender IB, Rickoff B, Sorin S. Assessment of reliability of electrical and thermal pulp testing agents. J Endod 1986; 12: 301-5.   DOI
11 Hargreaves KM, Cohen S, Berman LH. Cohen's pathways of the pulp. St. Louis, Mosby Elsevier. 2011.
12 Guglielmo A, Drum M, Reader A, Nusstein J. Anesthetic efficacy of a combination palatal and buccal infiltration of the maxillary first molar. J Endod 2011; 37: 460-2.   DOI
13 Andersson L, Kahnberg KE, Pogrel MA. Oral and maxillofacial surgery. Hoboken, John Wiley & Sons. 2012.
14 Jadhav GR, Mittal P. Anaesthesia techniques for maxillary molars - a questionnaire-based retrospective field survey of dentist in Western India. J Clin Diagn Res 2016; 10: ZC15-17.
15 Bataineh AB, Nusair YM, Al-Rahahleh RQ. Comparative study of articaine and lidocaine without palatal injection for maxillary teeth extraction. Clin Oral Investig 2019; 23: 3239-48.   DOI
16 Cui L, Zhang Z, Huang J, Yin D, Xu L. Extraction of permanent maxillary teeth without palatal injection: a meta-analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2018; 126: e187-95.   DOI
17 Wilson N, Dunne S. Manual of clinical procedures in dentistry. 1st ed. Hoboken, John Wiley & Sons. 2018.
18 Woodmansey K. Intraseptal anesthesia: a review of a relevant injection technique. Gen Dent 2005; 53: 418-20.
19 Brkovic BM, Savic M, Andric M, Jurisic M, Todorovic L. Intraseptal vs. periodontal ligament anaesthesia for maxillary tooth extraction: quality of local anaesthesia and haemodynamic response. Clin Oral Investig 2010; 14: 675-81.   DOI
20 Gazal G, Alharbi R, Fareed WM, Omar E, Alolayan AB, Al-Zoubi H, et al. Comparison of onset anesthesia time and injection discomfort of 4% articaine and 2% mepivacaine during teeth extractions. Saudi J Anaesth 2017; 11: 152-7.   DOI
21 Ramirez K, Lee JK, Takara JT. Painless pediatric local anesthesia. Gen Dent 2001; 49: 174-6.
22 Welbury R, Duggal MS, Hosey MT. Paediatric dentistry. Oxford, Oxford university press. 2018.
23 Fiset L, Milgrom P, Weinstein P, Getz T, Glassman P. Psychophysiological responses to dental injections. J Am Dent Assoc 1985; 111: 578-83.   DOI
24 Leith R, Lynch K, O'Connell AC. Articaine use in children: a review. J. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2012; 13: 293-6.   DOI
25 Peng M, Zhu ZM, Yang XM. Feasibility of permanent maxillary tooth removal using articaine anesthesia without palatal injection. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2008; 26: 416-8.
26 Meechan JG. Supplementary routes to local anaesthesia. Int Endod J 2002; 35: 885-96.   DOI
27 Malamed SF, Gagnon S, Leblanc D. Efficacy of articaine: a new amide local anesthetic. J Am Dent Assoc 2000; 131: 635-42.   DOI
28 Bernick S, Nedelman C. Effect of aging on the human pulp. J Endod 1975; 1: 88-94.   DOI
29 Michaelson PL, Holland GR. Is pulpitis painful? Int Endod J 2002; 35: 829-32.   DOI
30 Morse DR, Esposito JV, Schoor RS. A radiographic study of aging changes of the dental pulp and dentin in normal teeth. Quintessence Int 1993; 24: 329-33.
31 Gross R, McCartney M, Reader A, Beck M. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of bupivacaine and lidocaine for maxillary infiltrations. J Endod 2007; 33: 1021-4.   DOI
32 Classification of chronic pain. Descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. Prepared by the International Association for the Study of Pain, Subcommittee on Taxonomy. Pain Suppl 1986; 3: S1-226.
33 Sathapana S, Forrest A, Monsour P, Naser-ud-Din S. Age-related changes in maxillary and mandibular cortical bone thickness in relation to temporary anchorage device placement. Aust Dent J 2013; 58: 67-74.   DOI
34 Fayed MM, Pazera P, Katsaros C. Optimal sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement assessed by cone beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 2010; 80: 939-51.   DOI
35 Swasty D, Lee JS, Huang JC, Maki K, Gansky SA, Hatcher D, et al. Anthropometric analysis of the human mandibular cortical bone as assessed by cone-beam computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67: 491-500.   DOI
36 Soysa NS, Soysa IB, Alles N. Efficacy of articaine vs lignocaine in maxillary and mandibular infiltration and block anesthesia in the dental treatments of adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Investig Clin Dent 2019; 10: e12404.
37 Katz S, Drum M, Reader A, Nusstein J, Beck M. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, 4% prilocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine, and 4% prilocaine for maxillary infiltrations. Anesth Prog 2010; 57: 45-51.   DOI
38 Hosseini HR, Parirokh M, Nakhaee N, V Abbott P, Samani S. Efficacy of articaine and lidocaine for buccal infiltration of first maxillary molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a randomized double-blinded clinical trial. Iran Endod J 2016; 11: 79-84.
39 Isik K, Kalayci A, Durmus E. Comparison of depth of anesthesia in different parts of maxilla when only buccal anesthesia was done for maxillary teeth extraction. Int J Dent 2011; 2011: 575874.   DOI
40 Sharma K, Sharma A, Aseri M, Batta A, Singh V, Pilania D, et al. Maxillary posterior teeth removal without palatal injection -truth or myth: a dilemma for oral surgeons. J Clin Diagn Res 2014; 8: ZC01-4.
41 Lima-Junior JL, Dias-Ribeiro E, de Araujo TN, Ferreira-Rocha J, Honfi-Junior ES, Sarmento C, et al. Evaluation of the buccal vestibule-palatal diffusion of 4% articaine hydrochloride in impacted maxillary third molar extractions. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2009; 14: E129-32.
42 Meechan JG, Day PF, McMillan AS. Local anesthesia in the palate: a comparison of techniques and solutions. Anesth Prog 2000; 47: 139-42.
43 McArdle BF. Painless palatal anesthesia. J Am Dent Assoc 1997; 128: 647.   DOI
44 Uckan S, Dayangac E, Araz K. Is permanent maxillary tooth removal without palatal injection possible? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 102: 733-5.   DOI
45 Meechan JG, Howlett PC, Smith BD. Factors influencing the discomfort of intraoral needle penetration. Anesth Prog 2005; 52: 91-4.   DOI
46 Huguet A, Stinson JN, McGrath PJ. Measurement of self-reported pain intensity in children and adolescents. J Psychosom Res 2010; 68: 329-36.   DOI
47 Ono A, Motoyoshi M, Shimizu N. Cortical bone thickness in the buccal posterior region for orthodontic mini-implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 37: 334-40.   DOI
48 Malamed SF, Gagnon S, Leblanc D. Articaine hydrochloride: a study of the safety of a new amide local anesthetic. J Am Dent Assoc 2001; 132: 177-85.   DOI
49 Fan S, Chen WL, Yang ZH, Huang ZQ. Comparison of the efficiencies of permanent maxillary tooth removal performed with single buccal infiltration versus routine buccal and palatal injection. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 107: 359-63.   DOI
50 Meechan JG. Effective topical anesthetic agents and techniques. Dent Clin North Am 2002; 46: 759-66.   DOI
51 Kanaa MD, Whitworth JM, Meechan JG. A comparison of the efficacy of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine in achieving pulpal anesthesia in maxillary teeth with irreversible pulpitis. J Endod 2012; 38: 279-82.   DOI
52 Wahl MJ, Schmitt MM, Overton DA, Gordon MK. Injection pain of bupivacaine with epinephrine vs. prilocaine plain. J Am Dent Assoc 2002; 133: 1652-6.   DOI
53 Kumaresan R, Srinivasan B, Pendayala S. Comparison of the effectiveness of lidocaine in permanent maxillary teeth removal performed with single buccal infiltration versus routine buccal and palatal injection. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2015; 14: 252-7.   DOI
54 Meechan JG, Day PF. A comparison of intraoral injection discomfort produced by plain and epinephrine-containing lidocaine local anesthetic solutions: a randomized, double-blind, split-mouth, volunteer investigation. Anesth Prog 2002; 49: 44-8.
55 Bonar T, Nusstein J, Reader A, Drum M, Fowler S, Beck M. Anesthetic efficacy of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraseptal injection: a prospective, randomized double-blind study. Anesth Prog 2017; 64: 203-11.   DOI
56 Nusstein J, Lee S, Reader A, Beck M, Weaver J. Injection pain and postinjection pain of the anterior middle superior alveolar injection administered with the Wand or conventional syringe. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004; 98: 124-31.   DOI
57 Aggarwal V, Jain A, Kabi D. Anesthetic efficacy of supplemental buccal and lingual infiltrations of articaine and lidocaine after an inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis. J Endod 2009; 35: 925-9.   DOI
58 Cohenca N, Paranjpe A, Berg J. Vital pulp therapy. Dent Clin North Am 2013; 57: 59-73.   DOI
59 Somuri AV, Rai AB, Pillai M. Extraction of permanent maxillary teeth by only buccal infiltration of articaine. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 12: 130-2.
60 Srinivasan N, Kavitha M, Loganathan CS, Padmini G. Comparison of anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine for maxillary buccal infiltration in patients with irreversible pulpitis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 107: 133-6.   DOI
61 Lima JL Jr, Dias-Ribeiro E, Ferreira-Rocha J, Soares R, Costa FW, Fan S, et al. Comparison of buccal infiltration of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 and 1:200,000 epinephrine for extraction of maxillary third molars with pericoronitis: a pilot study. Anesth Prog 2013; 60: 42-5.   DOI
62 Hong X, Zeng Y, Song X. Using only buccal infiltration of articaine in maxilary third molar extraction: a clinical comparative study. J Oral Sci Res 2008; 24: 693-4.
63 Luqman U, Majeed Janjua OS, Ashfaq M, Irfan H, Mushtaq S, Bilal A. Comparison of articaine and lignocaine for uncomplicated maxillary exodontia. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2015; 25: 181-4.
64 Meechan JG. How to overcome failed local anaesthesia. Br Dent J 1999; 186: 15-20.   DOI
65 Yapp KE, Hopcraft MS, Parashos P. Articaine: a review of the literature. Br Dent J 2011; 210: 323-9.   DOI
66 Brunetto PC, Ranali J, Ambrosano GM, de Oliveira PC, Groppo FC, Meechan JG, et al. Anesthetic efficacy of 3 volumes of lidocaine with epinephrine in maxillary infiltration anesthesia. Anesth Prog 2008; 55: 29-34.   DOI
67 Septanest 1:100,000 (4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine injection solution) [package insert on the Internet]. Maidstone: Septodont; 2020 [revised 2020 Apr; cited 2020 Nov 19]. Available from https://www.septodont.co.uk/sites/uk/files/2021-01/UK-SmPC-Septanest-1-100000.pdf.
68 Wright GZ, Weinberger SJ, Friedman CS, Plotzke OB. Use of articaine local anesthesia in children under 4 years of age--a retrospective report. Anesth Prog 1989; 36: 268-71.
69 Brandt RG, Anderson PF, McDonald NJ, Sohn W, Peters MC. The pulpal anesthetic efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine in dentistry: a meta-analysis. J Am Dent Assoc 2011; 142: 493-504.   DOI
70 Shalash M, El Adl NM, Emara AS. Anesthetic efficacy of three different volumes of 4% articaine for extraction of maxillary posterior teeth - a randomized trial. J Int Dent Med Res 2020; 13: 241-5.
71 Sisk AL. Vasoconstrictors in local anesthesia for dentistry. Anesth Prog 1992; 39: 187-93.
72 Bernick S. Effect of aging on the nerve supply to human teeth. J Dent Res 1967; 46: 694-9.   DOI
73 Weisleder R, Yamauchi S, Caplan DJ, Trope M, Teixeira FB. The validity of pulp testing: a clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc 2009; 140: 1013-7.   DOI
74 Viswanath D, Kumar M, Prabhuji M. Dental anxiety, fear and phobia in children. Int J Dent Res Dev 2014; 4: 1-14.
75 Al-Namankany A, de Souza M, Ashley P. Evidence-based dentistry: analysis of dental anxiety scales for children. Br Dent J 2012; 212: 219-22.   DOI
76 Pantera EA Jr, Anderson RW, Pantera CT. Reliability of electric pulp testing after pulpal testing with dichlorodifluoromethane. J Endod 1993; 19: 312-4.   DOI
77 Buchanan H, Niven N. Validation of a Facial Image Scale to assess child dental anxiety. Int J Paediatr Dent 2002; 12: 47-52.   DOI
78 Jones VR, Rivera EM, Walton RE. Comparison of carbon dioxide versus refrigerant spray to determine pulpal responsiveness. J Endod 2002; 28: 531-3.   DOI
79 Cohen S, Hargreaves KM. Pathways of the pulp. 9th ed. St Louis, Mosby. 2006, pp786-821.
80 Bender IB, Landau MA, Fonsecca S, Trowbridge HO. The optimum placement-site of the electrode in electric pulp testing of the 12 anterior teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 1989; 118: 305-10.   DOI
81 Lin J, Chandler N, Purton D, Monteith B. Appropriate electrode placement site for electric pulp testing first molar teeth. J Endod 2007; 33: 1296-8.   DOI
82 Certosimo AJ, Archer RD. A clinical evaluation of the electric pulp tester as an indicator of local anesthesia. Oper Dent 1996; 21: 25-30.
83 Bernick S. Differences in nerve distribution between erupted and non-erupted human teeth. J Dent Res 1964; 43: 406-11.   DOI
84 Johnsen DC, Harshbarger J, Rymer HD. Quantitative assessment of neural development in human premolars. Anat Rec 1983; 205: 421-9.   DOI
85 Ehrmann EH. Pulp testers and pulp testing with particular reference to the use of dry ice. Aust Dent J 1977; 22: 272-9.   DOI
86 Malamed SF. Handbook of Local Anesthesia. 6th ed. St. Louis, Elsevier/Mosby. 2013, pp188-224.
87 Latt MM, Kiattavorncharoen S, Boonsiriseth K, Pairuchvej V, Wongsirichat N. The efficacy of dexamethasone injection on postoperative pain in lower third molar surgery. J Dent Anesth Pain Med 2016; 16: 95-102.   DOI
88 Corah NL, Gale EN, Illig SJ. Assessment of a dental anxiety scale. J Am Dent Assoc 1978; 97: 816-9.   DOI
89 Abdellatif AM. Pain assessment of two palatal anesthetic techniques and their effects on the child's behavior. Pediatr Dent J 2011; 21: 129-37.   DOI
90 Aggarwal V, Singla M, Miglani S, Ansari I, Kohli S. A prospective, randomized, single-blind comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of posterior superior alveolar nerve blocks, buccal infiltrations, and buccal plus palatal infiltrations in patients with irreversible pulpitis. J Endod 2011; 37: 1491-4.   DOI
91 Mason R, Drum M, Reader A, Nusstein J, Beck M. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of 2% lidocaine with 1: 100,000 and 1: 50,000 epinephrine and 3% mepivacaine for maxillary infiltrations. J Endod 2009; 35: 1173-7.   DOI
92 Mikesell A, Drum M, Reader A, Beck M. Anesthetic efficacy of 1.8 mL and 3.6 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1: 100,000 epinephrine for maxillary infiltrations. J Endod 2008; 34: 121-5.   DOI
93 Evans G, Nusstein J, Drum M, Reader A, Beck M. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of articaine and lidocaine for maxillary infiltrations. J Endod 2008; 34: 389-93.   DOI
94 Ingle JI, Bakland LK, Baumgartne JC. Ingle's endodontics 6e. 6th ed. Hamilton, McGraw-Hill Education. 2008.
95 Oloart L. Excitation of intradental sensory units by pharmacological agents. Acta Physiol Scand 1974; 92: 48-55.   DOI
96 Gopikrishna V, Pradeep G, Venkateshbabu N. Assessment of pulp vitality: a review. Int J Paediatr Dent 2009; 19: 3-15.   DOI
97 Trowbridge HO, Franks M, Korostoff E, Emling R. Sensory response to thermal stimulation in human teeth. J Endod 1980; 6: 405-12.   DOI
98 Chen E, Abbott PV. Evaluation of accuracy, reliability, and repeatability of five dental pulp tests. J Endod 2011; 37: 1619-23.   DOI
99 Lilja J. Innervation of different parts of the predentin and dentin in young human premolars. Acta Odontol Scand 1979; 37: 339-46.   DOI
100 Kitamura T, Takahashi T, Horiuchi H. Electrical characteristics and clinical application of a new automatic pulp tester. Quintessence Int 1983; 14: 45-53.
101 Beltramini A, Milojevic K, Pateron D. Pain assessment in newborns, infants, and children. Pediatr Ann 2017; 46: e387-95.
102 Boonsiriseth K, Klongnoi B, Sirintawat N, Saengsirinavin C, Wongsirichat N. Comparative study of the effect of dexamethasone injection and consumption in lower third molar surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 41: 244-7.   DOI
103 Graber LW, Vanarsdall RL, Vig KW, Huang GJ. Orthodontics: current principles and techniques. 5th ed. St. Louis, Elsevier Health Sciences. 2016.
104 Reader A, Nusstein J, Drum M. Successful local anesthesia for restorative dentistry and endodontics. Chicago, Quintessence Publishing Company. 2011.
105 Nuttall NM, Bradnock G, White D, Morris J, Nunn J. Dental attendance in 1998 and implications for the future. Br Dent J 2001; 190: 177-82.   DOI
106 Saadoun AP, Malamed S. Intraseptal anesthesia in periodontal surgery. J Am Dent Assoc 1985; 111: 249-56.   DOI
107 Doman SM. An audit of the use of intra-septal local anaesthesia in a dental practice in the South of England. Prim Dent Care 2011; 18: 67-71.   DOI
108 Sirintawat N, Sawang K, Chaiyasamut T, Wongsirichat N. Pain measurement in oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Dent Anesth Pain Med 2017; 174: 253-63.
109 Selvido DI, Bhattarai BP, Rokaya D, Niyomtham N, Wongsirichat N. Pain in oral and maxillofacial surgery and implant dentistry: types and management. Eur J Dent 2021; 15: 588-98.   DOI
110 Moranon P, Chaiyasamut T, Sakdajeyont W, Vorakulpipat C, Klongnoi B, Kiattavornchareon S, et al. Dexamethasone injection into pterygomandibular space versus sublingual space on post-operative sequalae of lower third molar intervention. J Clin Med Res 2019; 11: 501-8.   DOI
111 Gazal G, Bahabri R, Alolayan AB, Alkayyal M, Al-Ghamdi R, Salamah R. How successful is supplemental intraseptal and buccal infiltration anaesthesia in the mandibular molars of patients undergoing root canal treatment or tooth extraction?. J Oral Maxillofac Res 2020; 11: e5.
112 Gazal G, Fareed WM, Zafar MS. Role of intraseptal anesthesia for pain-free dental treatment. Saudi J Anaesth 2016; 10: 81-6.   DOI
113 Deguchi T, Nasu M, Murakami K, Yabuuchi T, Kamioka H, Takano-Yamamoto T. Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness with computed tomographic scanning for orthodontic implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 129: 721.e7-12.   DOI
114 Coggins R, Reader A, Nist R, Beck M, Meyers WJ. Anesthetic efficacy of the intraosseous injection in maxillary and mandibular teeth. Oral Surg Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 1996; 81: 634-41.   DOI
115 Biocanin V, Brkovic B, Milicic B, Stojic D. Efficacy and safety of intraseptal and periodontal ligament anesthesia achieved by computer-controlled articaine + epinephrine delivery: a dose-finding study. Clin Oral Investig 2013; 17: 525-33.   DOI
116 Pandrangi T. Articaine versus lidocaine for a primary intraseptal injection: The Ohio State University thesis; 2015.
117 Chen E, Abbott PV. Dental pulp testing: a review. Int J Dent 2009; 2009: 365785.   DOI