1 |
Baghlaf K, Alamoudi N, Elashiry E, Farsi N, El Derwi DA, Abdullah AM. The pain-related behavior and pain perception associated with computerized anesthesia in pulpotomies of mandibular primary molars: A randomized controlled trial. Quintessence Int 2015; 46: 799-806.
|
2 |
Alamoudi NM, Baghlaf KK, Elashiry EA, Farsi NM, El Derwi DA, Bayoumi AM. The effectiveness of computerized anesthesia in primary mandibular molar pulpotomy: A randomized controlled trial. Quintessence Int 2016; 47: 217-24.
|
3 |
Elbay US, Elbay M, Kaya E, Cilasun U. Intraligamentary and supraperiosteal anesthesia efficacy using a computer controlled delivery system in mandibular molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2016; 40: 193-9.
DOI
|
4 |
Oztas N, Ulusu T, Bodur H, Dogan C. The Wand in pulp therapy: an alternative to inferior alveolar nerve block. Quintessence Int 2005; 36: 559-64.
|
5 |
Ram D, Kassirer J. Assessment of a palatal approachanterior superior alveolar (P-ASA) nerve block with the in paediatric dental patients. Int J Paediatr Dent 2006; 16: 348-51.
|
6 |
Kim S. Ligamental injection: A physiological explantation of its efficacy. J Endod 1986; 12: 486-91.
DOI
|
7 |
Kaufman E, Weinstein P, Milgrom P. Difficulties in achieving local anesthesia. J Am Dent Assoc 1984; 108: 205-8.
DOI
|
8 |
Malamed SF. The periodontal ligament (PDL) injection: an alternative to inferior alveolar nerve block. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1982; 53: 117-21.
DOI
|
9 |
Davidson L, Craig S. The use of the periodontal ligament injection in children. J Dent 1987; 15: 204-8.
DOI
|
10 |
Krochak M, Friedman N. Using a precision-metered injection system to minimize dental injection anxiety. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998; 19:137-40, 142-3, 146.
|
11 |
Brannstrom M, Nordenvall K, Hedstrom K. Periodontal tissue changes after intraligamentary anesthesia. ASDC J Dent Child 1982; 49: 417.
|
12 |
Saxena P, Gupta SK, Newaskar V, Chandra A. Advances in dental local anesthesia techniques and devices: An update. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 2013; 4: 19-24.
DOI
|
13 |
Thoppe-Dhamodhara YK, Asokan S, John BJ, Pollachi-Ramakrishnan G, Ramachandran P, Vilvanathan P. Cartridge syringe vs computer controlled local anesthetic delivery system: Pain related behaviour over two sequential visits-a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Exp Dent 2015; 7: e513-8.
|
14 |
Garret-Bernardin A, Cantile T, D'Anto V, Galanakis A, Fauxpoint G, Ferrazzano GF, et al. Pain Experience and Behavior Management in Pediatric Dentistry: A Comparison between Traditional Local Anesthesia and the Wand Computerized Delivery System. Pain Res Manag 2017; 2017: 7941238.
|
15 |
Allard G, Stokes T. Continuous observation: a detailed record of children's behavior during dental treatment. ASDC J Dent Child 1980; 47: 246.
|
16 |
Ashkenazi M, Blumer S, Eli I. Effect of computerized delivery intraligamental injection in primary molars on their corresponding permanent tooth buds. Int J Paediatr Dent 2010; 20: 270-5.
DOI
|
17 |
Nusstein JM, Reader A, Drum M. Local anesthesia strategies for the patient with a "hot" tooth. Dent Clin 2010; 54: 237-47.
|
18 |
Shabazfar N, Daublander M, Al-Nawas B, Kammerer P. Periodontal intraligament injection as alternative to inferior alveolar nerve block-meta-analysis of the literature from 1979 to 2012. Clin Oral Investig 2014; 18: 351-8.
DOI
|
19 |
Hochman MN. Single-tooth anesthesia: pressure-sensing technology provides innovative advancement in the field of dental local anesthesia. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2007; 28: 186-8, 190, 192-3.
|
20 |
Fischer G, Riethmueller RH. Local Anesthesia in Dentistry. Lea & Febiger; 1912.
|
21 |
Amoudi NA, Feda M, Sharaf A, Hanno A, Farsi N. Assessment of the anesthetic effectiveness of anterior and middle superior alveolar injection using a computerized device versus traditional technique in children. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2008; 33: 97-102.
DOI
|
22 |
Feda M, Al Amoudi N, Sharaf A, Hanno A, Farsi N, Masoud I, et al. A comparative study of children's pain reactions and perceptions to AMSA injection using CCLAD versus traditional injections. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2010; 34: 217-22.
DOI
|
23 |
Mittal M, Kumar A, Srivastava D, Sharma P, Sharma S. Pain perception: computerized versus traditional local anesthesia in pediatric patients. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2015; 39: 470-4.
DOI
|
24 |
Versloot J, Veerkamp J, Hoogstraten J. Pain behaviour and distress in children during two sequential dental visits: comparing a computerised anaesthesia delivery system and a traditional syringe. Br Dent J 2008; 205: E2.
DOI
|
25 |
Ram D, Peretz B. The assessment of pain sensation during local anesthesia using a computerized local anesthesia (Wand) and a conventional syringe. J Dent Child 2003; 70: 130-3.
|
26 |
Blanton PL, Jeske AH. Dental local anesthetics: alternative delivery methods. J Am Dent Assoc 2003; 134: 228-34.
DOI
|
27 |
Klein U, Hunzeker C, Hutfless S, Galloway A. Quality of anesthesia for the maxillary primary anterior segment in pediatric patients: Comparison of the P-ASA nerve block using compumed delivery system vs traditional supraperiosteal injections. J Dent Child 2005; 72: 119-25.
|
28 |
Kandiah P, Tahmassebi JF. Comparing the onset of maxillary infiltration local anaesthesia and pain experience using the conventional technique vs. the Wand in children. Br Dent J 2012; 213: E15.
DOI
|