Browse > Article

Meta-analysis for Efficacy and Safety of Propofol during Dental Sedation  

Choi, Seong-Seok (Department of Dental Anesthesiology, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Seo, Kwang-Suk (Department of Dental Anesthesiology, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Kim, Hyun-Jeong (Department of Dental Anesthesiology, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Dental Society of Anesthesiology / v.12, no.2, 2012 , pp. 75-91 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: Dental sedation reduces fear and phobia during dental treatment and helps patients get quality treatment by inducing adequate consciousness control. Propofol has recently grabbed the spotlight, but no meta-analysis for efficacy and safety of propofol in dentistry has yet been performed. Thus, the purpose of this study was to perform meta-analysis to verify the efficacy and safety of propofol for use in dental sedation. Methods: Articles published between 1980 and 2010 were searched in the web sites, journals and medical database including The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and EMBASE. And a total of 22 studies were selected among the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the use of propofol with other sedatives (control group). The data was collected from these studies and meta-analysis for efficacy and safety was performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis 5.0 (CMA 5.0). Results: The patient recovered significantly faster and discharged significantly earlier in the propofol group (SMD = -1.442, P < 0.001). The satisfaction of patient and that of operator was higher in the propofol group (P < 0.05). The incidence of arrhythmia and apnea/ hypoventilation was significantly lower in the propofol group (OR = 0.071, P < 0.05), and there was no significant difference in the other side effects. On the level of sedation, although the sedation score was significantly lower in the propofol group (SMD = -0.430, P < 0.05). Conclusions: The present analysis showed that the use of propofol resulted in high satisfaction levels on the part of the patients and operators, a shorter recovery time, and faster hospital discharge. The incidence of complications, however, was lower in the propofol groups or not much different between the propofol and control groups. Thus, the adequate use of propofol in dentistry is believed to be helpful for the effective and safe sedation of the patients.
Keywords
Dental sedation; Efficacy; Meta-analysis; Propofol; Randomized controlled trial (RCT); Safety;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Mackenzie N, Grant IS: Propofol for intravenous sedation. Anaesthesia 1987; 42(1): 3-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Ruiz K, Coldwell SA, Hitchin N, Dresner-Black E: Propofol sedation in general dental practice: the first 100 patients. Dent Update 2000; 27(1): 16-20, 2, 4.   DOI
3 Singh H, Poluha W, Cheung M, Choptain N, Baron KI, Taback SP: Propofol for sedation during colonoscopy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; (4): CD006268.
4 Marik PE: Propofol: therapeutic indications and side-effects. Curr Pharm Des 2004; 10(29): 3639-49.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Jadad AR: Randomised controlled trials. London, BMJ Books. 1998 pp28-36
6 Fleiss JL: Analysis of data from multiclinic trials. Control Clin Trials 1986; 7(4): 267-75.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Song HH: Meta-Analysis for Researches in Medical, Nursing, and Social Science. Seoul, Chung-Moon Gak. 1998.
8 Parworth LP, Frost DE, Zuniga JR, Bennett T: Propofol and fentanyl compared with midazolam and fentanyl during third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998; 56(4): 447-53; discussion 53-4.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Stephens AJ, Sapsford DJ, Curzon ME: Intravenous sedation for handicapped dental patients: a clinical trial of midazolam and propofol. Br Dent J 1993; 175(1): 20-5.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Tan WK, Tan JM, Chan O: Comparison of patientcontrolled sedation with propofol and alfentanil for third molar surgery--preliminary results of a pilot study. Singapore Dent J 2000; 23(1 Suppl): 18-22.
11 Valtonen M, Salonen M, Forssell H, Scheinin M, Viinamaki O: Propofol infusion for sedation in outpatient oral surgery. A comparison with diazepam. Anaesthesia 1989; 44(9): 730-4.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Win NN, Fukayama H, Kohase H, Umino M: The different effects of intravenous propofol and midazolam sedation on hemodynamic and heart rate variability. Anesth Analg 2005; 101(1): 97-102, table of contents.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Takaishi K, Kaneko M, Ohta M, Onoue T, Tomioka S, Nakajo N: A comparison of dexmedetomidine versus propofol for conscious sedation during oral surgery. Journal of Japanese Dental Society of Anesthesiology 2007; 35(2): 218-23.
14 Cohen M, Eisig S, Kraut RA: Comparison of recovery of propofol and methohexital sedation using an infusion pump. Anesth Prog 1996; 43(1): 9-13.
15 Johns FR, Sandler NA, Buckley MJ, Herlich A: Comparison of propofol and methohexital continuous infusion techniques for conscious sedation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998; 56(10): 1124-7; discussion 7-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Arya VS, Damle SG: Comparative evaluation of Midazolam and Propofol as intravenous sedative agents in the management of unco-operative children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2002; 20(1): 6-8.
17 Leitch JA, Anderson K, Gambhir S, Millar K, Robb ND, Mchugh S, et al.: A partially blinded randomised controlled trial of patient-maintained propofol sedation and operator controlled midazolam sedation in third molar extractions. Anaesthesia 2004; 59(9): 853-60.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Rai K, Hegde AM, Goel K: Sedation in uncooperative children undergoing dental procedures: a comparative evaluation of midazolam, propofol and ketamine. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2007; 32(1): 1-4.   DOI
19 Rudkin GE, Osborne GA, Finn BP, Jarvis DA, Vickers D: Intra-operative patient-controlled sedation. Comparison of patient-controlled propofol with patient-controlled midazolam. Anaesthesia 1992; 47(5): 376-81.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Tomoyasu Y, Higuchi H, Yoshida K, Watanabe Y, Hayashi Y, Kohjitani A, et al.: A comparison between dexmedetomidine hydrochloride and propofol in sedation following oral and maxillofacial surgery. Journal of Japanese Dental Society of Anesthesiology 2007; 35(2): 197-201.
21 Tsugayasu R, Handa T, Kaneko Y, Ichinohe T: Midazolam more effectively suppresses sympathetic activations and reduces stress feelings during mental arithmetic task than propofol. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68(3): 590-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Lee DH, Kim JW, Lee SJ, Kim JH, Jang TH, An SH, et al.: Comparison of use of midazolam combined with fentanyl or propofol in IV sedation. Journal of Korean Dental Society of Anesthesiology 2008; (8): 113-7.
23 Cillo JE, Jr., Finn R: Moderate intravenous sedation for office-based full face laser resurfacing using a continuous infusion propofol pump. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 63(7): 903-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Meyers CJ, Eisig SB, Kraut RA: Comparison of propofol and methohexital for deep sedation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994; 52(5): 448-52; discussion 52-3.
25 Okawa K, Ichinohe T, Kaneko Y: A comparison of propofol and dexmedetomidine for intravenous sedation: a randomized, crossover study of the effects on the central and autonomic nervous systems. Anesth Analg 2010; 110(2): 415-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Sarasin DS, Ghoneim MM, Block RI: Effects of sedation with midazolam or propofol on cognition and psychomotor functions. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996; 54(10): 1187-93.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Skaret E, Soevdsnes EK: Behavioural science in dentistry. The role of the dental hygienist in prevention and treatment of the fearful dental patient. Int J Dent Hyg 2005; 3(1): 2-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Van Wijk AJ, Hoogstraten J: Reducing fear of pain associated with endodontic therapy. Int Endod J 2006; 39(5): 384-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Higgins M: Dental anesthesiology--an access to care issue. Alpha Omegan 2006; 99(2): 56-63.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Gravino E, Leone D, Gravante U, Falbo A, Tufano R: [Midazolam versus propofol for conscious sedation in ambulatory oral surgery]. Minerva Anestesiol 1990; 56(9): 919-21.
31 Glass PS, Bloom M, Kearse L, Rosow C, Sebel P, Manberg P: Bispectral analysis measures sedation and memory effects of propofol, midazolam, isoflurane, and alfentanil in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology 1997; 86(4): 836-47.   DOI   ScienceOn
32 Dickersin K: The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. JAMA 1990; 263(10): 1385-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Greenland S: Invited commentary: a critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods. Am J Epidemiol 1994; 140(3): 290-6.   DOI
34 Cohen J: Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. 1988
35 Ibrahim AE, Taraday JK, Kharasch ED: Bispectral index monitoring during sedation with sevoflurane, midazolam, and propofol. Anesthesiology 2001; 95(5): 1151-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
36 Lee JS, Gonzalez ML, Chuang SK, Perrott DH: Comparison of methohexital and propofol use in ambulatory procedures in oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 66(10): 1996-2003.   DOI   ScienceOn
37 Shimada R, Noguchi I: Effects of sedative doses of dexmedetomidine and propofol on EEG and cardiorespiratory changes. Journal of Japanese Dental Society of Anesthesiology 2007; 35(2): 170-8.
38 Taniyama K, Oda H, Okawa K, Himeno K, Shikanai K, Shibutani T: Psychosedation with dexmedetomidine hydrochloride during minor oral surgery. Anesth Prog 2009; 56(3): 75-80.   DOI   ScienceOn