Browse > Article

Gow-Gates Mandibular Nerve Block Anesthesia - Is It an Old Forgotten Technique?  

Han, Ji-Young (Division of Periodontology, Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Hanyang University)
Kim, Kwang-Soo (Division of Preventive Dentistry, Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Hanyang University)
Seo, Min-Seock (Division of Conservative Dentistry, Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Hanyang University)
Hwang, Kyung-Gyun (Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Hanyang University)
Park, Chang-Joo (Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Hanyang University)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Dental Society of Anesthesiology / v.11, no.1, 2011 , pp. 16-21 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: Since introduced by Gow-Gates GA in 1973, Gow-Gates mandibular nerve block (GMNB) has played an important role in the area of dental local anesthesia. However, compared to the conventional inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB), this technique seems to fail to attract the attentions of general practitioners in South Korea. The aim of this study was to prove the clinical real value, mainly the anesthetic efficacy, of GMNB in minor oral surgery. Methods: The study group comprised 40 patients (15 males and 25 females) who were randomly allocated to receive GMNB or IANB for extraction of third molars. Both techniques utilized two 1.8 ml dental cartridges of 2% lidocaine including 1:100,000 epinephrine for each patient. Pulpal and gingival tissue anesthesia of mandibular premolars and molars were recorded at 0, 15 and 40 minutes after administration of local anesthetics using both an electric pulp tester and a sharp dental explorer. Results: The success rates of pulpal and gingival tissue anesthesia in the IANB group were not significantly different from the GMNB group in overall efficacy. Patient's and operator's satisfaction ratings were also not significantly different between two groups. Interestingly, the injection pain of GMNB group was significantly lower than that of IANB group. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the anesthetic efficacy of pulpal and gingival tissue of GMNB was not inferior to that of IANB. The GMNB could be a good alternative of the IANB in most of minor oral surgical procedures.
Keywords
Anesthesia; Local; Gow-Gates Mandibular Nerve Block; Molar; Third; Surgery; Oral;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Sisk AL: Evaluation of the Gow-Gates mandibular block for oral surgery. Anesth Prog 1985; 32: 143-6.
2 Trebus DL, Singh G, Meyer RD: Anatomical basis for inferior alveolar nerve block. Gen Dent 1998; 46: 632-6.
3 Waikakul A, Punwutikorn J: A comparative study of the extra-intraoral landmark technique and the direct technique for inferior alveolar nerve block. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991; 49: 804-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Watson JE: Some anatomic aspects of the Gow- Gates technique for mandibular anesthesia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1973; 36: 328-30.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Watson JE, Gow-Gates GA: A clinical evaluation of the Gow-Gates mandibular block technique. NZ Dent J 1976; 72: 220-3.
6 Wilkie GJ. Temporary uniocular blindness and ophthalmoplegia associated with a mandibular block injection. A case report. Aust Dent J 2000; 45: 131-3.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Zandi M, Seyedzadeh Sabounchi S:Design and development of a device for facilitation of Gow-Gates mandibular block and evaluation of its efficacy. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 12: 149-53.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Goldberg S, Reader A, Drum M, Nusstein J, Beck M: Comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of the conventional inferior alveolar, Gow-Gates, and Vazirani-Akinosi techniques. J Endod 2008; 34: 1306-11.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Gow-Gates GA: Mandibular conduction anesthesia: a new technique using extraoral landmarks. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1973; 36: 321-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Gow-Gates GA, Watson JE: Gow-Gates mandibular blockapplied anatomy and histology. Anesth Prog 1989; 36: 193-5.
11 Jofre J, Munzenmayer C: Design and preliminary evaluation of an extraoral Gow-Gates guiding device. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998; 85: 661-4.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Malamed SF: Handbook of Local Anesthesia. 5th ed. St Louis, Mosby. 2004, pp 197-230.
13 Kohler BR, Castellón L, Laissle G: Gow-Gates technique: a pilot study for extraction procedures with clinical evaluation and review. Anesth Prog 2008; 55: 2-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Levy TP: An assessment of the Gow-Gates mandibular block for third molar surgery. J Am Dent Assoc 1981; 103: 37-41.   DOI
15 Malamed SF: The Gow-Gates mandibular block. Evaluation after 4,275 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1981; 51: 463-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 McKissock MD, Meyer RD: Accessory innervation of the mandible: identification and anesthesia options. Gen Dent 2000; 48: 662-9.
17 Meechan JG: How to overcome failed local anaesthesia. Br Dent J 1999; 186: 15-20.
18 Montagnese TA, Reader A, Melfi R: A comparative study of the Gow-Gates technique and a standard technique for mandibular anesthesia. J Endod 1984; 10: 158-63.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Brodsky CD, Dower JS Jr: Middle ear problems after a Gow-Gates injection. J Am Dent Assoc 2001; 132: 1420-4.   DOI
20 Aggarwal V, Singla M, Kabi D: Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of Gow-Gates mandibular conduction anesthesia, Vazirani-Akinosi technique, buccal-plus-lingual infiltrations, and conventional inferior alveolar nerve anesthesia in patients with irreversible pulpitis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 109: 303-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Cohen HP, Cha BY, Spangberg LS: Endodontic anesthesia in mandibular molars: a clinical study. J Endod 1993; 19: 370-3.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Dryden JA: An unusual complication resulting from a Gow- Gates mandibular block. Compendium 1993; 14: 94-8.