Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2021.43.4.139

A study on maxillofacial prosthesis: systematic considerations  

Hwang, Seong-Sig (Department of Dental Technology, Kyungdong University)
Im, Yong-Woon (Department of Dental Technology, Kyungdong University)
Publication Information
Journal of Technologic Dentistry / v.43, no.4, 2021 , pp. 139-144 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to provide basic data to identify the current status of use of maxillofacial prosthesis across the world and discuss its application and research directions in Korea. Methods: Existing literature (study period, 2010 to 2020) from international studies was collected from PsycINFO, CINAHL, and PubMed, whereas domestic studies were searched using KISS and RISS. Maxillofacial prosthesis was used as the search word. A total of three foreign and two domestic articles were searched, and as a result, a total of 12 documents were selected for analysis. Results: A total of 3,311 studies were searched in this study. Among them, 3,253 articles contained in duplicate inspection and exclusion criteria were removed, and 12 articles were selected by removing literature that did not meet the research criteria through title and green and text reviews. Finally, two researchers selected the final 12 articles through handwritten searches. Eleven of them were case studies, and the remaining one was a descriptive study. Conclusion: This study identified the current status of studies that implemented maxillofacial prosthesis, published from January 2010 to January 2020. Facial prosthetics improve the quality of life of patients by restoring defects that appear on different types of mouth and face and promote both function and aesthetics. Therefore, they can be used to treat various conditions and have a positive impact on the future.
Keywords
Maxillofacial prosthesis; Maxillofacial prosthetics; Systematic consideration;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Coas VR, Neves AC, Rode Sde M. Evaluation of the etiology of ocular globe atrophy or loss. Braz Dent J. 2005;16:243-246.   DOI
2 Goiato MC, Dos Santos DM, Moreno A, FilieHaddad M, Turcio KH. An alternate impression technique for ocular prostheses. J Prosthodont. 2013;22:338-340.   DOI
3 Fonder AC. Maxillofacial prosthetics. J Prosthet Dent. 1969;21:310-314.   DOI
4 Cobein MV, Coto NP, Crivello Junior O, Lemos JBD, Vieira LM, Pimentel ML, et al. Retention systems for extraoral maxillofacial prosthetic implants: a critical review. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;55:763-769.   DOI
5 Raghuvanshi S, Chand P, Singh SV, Aggarwal H, Arya D. Nonimplant, nonadhesive overlay approach to retain a partial auricular prosthesis. J Prosthodont. 2019;28:e826-e829.   DOI
6 Guttal KS, Naikmasur VG, Rao CB, Nadiger RK, Guttal SS. Orofacial rehabilitation of patients with post-cancer treatment--an overview and report of three cases. Indian J Cancer. 2010;47:59-64.
7 Goiato MC, Zucolotti BC, Mancuso DN, dos Santos DM, Pellizzer EP, Verri FR. Care and cleaning of maxillofacial prostheses. J Craniofac Surg. 2010;21:1270-1273.   DOI
8 Jamayet NB, Srithavaj T, Alam MK. A complete procedure of ocular prosthesis: a case report. Int Med J. 2013;20:729-730.
9 Phasuk K, Haug SP. Maxillofacial prosthetics. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2018;30:487-497.   DOI
10 Yoon HK, Hwang HS, Kim CH, Kim JH, Kim BJ. Use of artificial palate for improving facial support in the fabrication of a maxillary obturator: a case report. J Korean Acad Prosthodont. 2017;55:319-324.   DOI
11 Heo YR, Kim JW, Lee GJ, Chung CH. Palatal obturator restoration of a cleft palate patient with velopharyngeal insufficiency: a clinical report. J Korean Acad Prosthodont. 2013;51:353-360.   DOI
12 Brauner E, Pompa G, Quarato A, Jamshir S, De Angelis F, Di Carlo S, et al. Maxillofacial prosthesis in dentofacial traumas: a retrospective clinical study and introduction of new classification method. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:8136878.   DOI
13 Choi SJ, Jo KH, Lee KB. Prosthetic treatment with palatal obturator for the patient who had hemimaxillectomy: case report. J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci. 2011;27:337-342.
14 Kim YG, Hwang SS, Bae JB, Lee HK, Park YK, Seok SH, et al. Real maxillo-facial prosthesis technology. Paju: KOONJA, 2020.
15 Ackerman AJ. Maxillofacial prosthesis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1953;6:176-200.   DOI
16 Goiato MC, Zucolotti BC, Mancuso DN, dos Santos DM, Pellizzer EP, Verri FR. Care and cleaning of maxillofacial prostheses. J Craniofac Surg. 2010;21:1270-1273.   DOI
17 Arbesman M, Scheer J, Lieberman D. Using AOTA's critically appraised topic (CAT) and critically appraised paper 2008;13:18-22.
18 Erkapers M, Segerstrom S, Ekstrand K, Baer RA, Toljanic JA, Thor A. The influence of immediately loaded implant treatment in the atrophic edentulous maxilla on oral health related quality of life of edentulous patients: 3-year results of a prospective study. Head Face Med. 2017;13:21.   DOI
19 Jamayet NB, Zai SZE, Alam MK. Silicon orbital prosthesis: a clinical report. Int Med J. 2014;21:304-306.
20 Heo KH, Lim YJ, Kim MJ, Kwon HB. Prosthetic rehabilitation of partially edentulous patient after maxillectomy: a case report. J Korean Acad Prosthodont. 2016;54:167-171.   DOI