Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2021.43.1.1

Comparison of shrinkage according to thickness of photopolymerization resin for 3D printing  

Kim, Dong-Yeon (4RD Dental Laboratory)
Kim, Jae-Hong (Department of Dental Laboratory Science, College of Health Science, Catholic University of Pusan)
Publication Information
Journal of Technologic Dentistry / v.43, no.1, 2021 , pp. 1-5 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: To perform a comparative study on curing shrinkage according to the thickness of photopolymerization resin. Methods: Stainless steel molds of 2, 4, and 6 mm heights were prepared. The 2, 4, and 6 mm-height molds were classified as the 2H, 4H, and 6H groups, respectively. A photopolymerization resin was injected into the stainless steel mold. Photopolymerization was carried out using a photopolymer machine. During photopolymerization, the wavelength and intensity of 400~405 nm were set to 10, the highest intensity among 1~10. Photopolymerization was performed for 30 min per specimen (each group=10). The inner and outer areas of the specimen were measured. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis H test (α=0.05). Results: In terms of the inner and outer diameters of the photopolymerization resin specimen, the 2H group contracted the most, whereas the 6H group contracted the least. A statistically significant difference was found between the groups (p<0.05). Conclusion: The amount of light irradiation of the photopolymerization resin must be adjusted according to the thickness.
Keywords
3D printing; Photopolymer; Shrinkage; Thickness;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Kim DY, Kim JH, Lee BI, Lee JH, Kim WS, Park JY. Accuracy evaluation of dental model scanner according to occlusal attrition type. J Tech Dent. 2020;42:313-320.   DOI
2 Kim DY, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Comparison and evaluation of marginal and internal gaps in cobalt-chromium alloy copings fabricated using subtractive and additive manufacturing. J Prosthodont Res. 2018;62:56-64.   DOI
3 Azari A, Nikzad S. The evolution of rapid prototyping in dentistry: a review. Rapid Prototyp J. 2009;15:216-225.   DOI
4 Lee BI, You SG, You SM, Kim JH. Comparison of three-dimensional adaptation as per the rinsing time of temporary crown manufactured using a digital light processing printer. J Tech Dent. 2020;42:334-340.   DOI
5 Kim DY. Difference between shrinkage rate of irradiation amount of 3D printing UV curable resin and shrinkage rate according to a constant temperature water bath. J Korean Acad Dent Technol. 2020;42:113-120.   DOI
6 Sa MW, Kim JY. Comparison analysis and fabrication of Hollow Shaft scaffolds using polymer deposition system. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2015;12:46-52.   DOI
7 Park YD, Kang W. Comparative analysis of the flexural strength of provisional restorative resins using a digital light processing printer according to the post-curing method. J Tech Dent. 2020;42:341-347.   DOI
8 Prpic V, Slacanin I, Schauperl Z, Catic A, Dulcic N, Cimic S. A study of the flexural strength and surface hardness of different materials and technologies for occlusal device fabrication. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121:955-959.   DOI
9 Park DR, Son J. Comparison between mechanical properties and biocompatibility of experimental 3D printing denture resins according to photoinitiators. J Tech Dent. 2020;42:355-361.   DOI
10 Kim JH, Kim KB. Analysis of the quality of dental prostheses printed by digital light-processing technology. J Tech Dent. 2020;42:197-201.   DOI
11 Kang SY, Lee HN, Kim EB, Lee KE, Kim JH, Kim WC. Fitness of heat - pressed ceramic laminate veneer using additive manufacturing process: 3 dimensional analysis. J Korean Acad Dent Technol. 2017;39:137-143.
12 van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater. 2012;28:3-12.   DOI
13 Kim DY, Jeon JH, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Reproducibility of different arrangement of resin copings by dental microstereolithography: evaluating the marginal discrepancy of resin copings. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117:260-265.   DOI
14 Do HS, Kim DJ, Kim HJ. Application of UV-curable materials. JAI. 2003;4:41-51.
15 International Organization for Standardization. Dentistry - polymer-based filling, restorative and luting materials. 3rd ed. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2000.
16 Bae S, Lee J, Ra J. Evaluation of the changes in polymerization of TheraCal LC with various light-curing time and distance. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent. 2019;46:392-399.
17 ASTM International. ASTM C326-09 (2018), standard test method for drying and firing shrinkages of ceramic whiteware clays. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2009.
18 Jassim ZM, Majeed MA. Comparative evaluation of the fracture strength of monolithic crowns fabricated from different all-ceramic CAD/CAM materials (an in vitro study). Biomed Pharmacol J. 2018;11:1689-1697.   DOI
19 Spear F, Holloway J. Which all-ceramic system is optimal for anterior esthetics? J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139 Suppl: 19S-24S.   DOI
20 Karalekas D, Aggelopoulos A. Study of shrinkage strains in a stereolithography cured acrylic photopolymer resin. J Mater Process Technol. 2003;136:146-150.   DOI
21 Park JH, Choi NS. Polymerization shrinkage distribution of a dental composite during dental restoration observed by digital image correlation method. Compos Res. 2017;30:393-398.   DOI
22 Kwon Y, Cho UR. Study on the improvement of film shrinkage in UV-curing process. Polymer(Korea). 2011;35:320-324.