1 |
Nejatidanesh F, Lotfi HR, Savabi O. Marginal accuracy of interim restorations fabricated from four interim autopolymerizing resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;95:364-367.
DOI
|
2 |
Amin BM, Aras MA, Chitre V. A comparative evaluation of the marginal accuracy of crowns fabricated from four commercially available provisional materials: an in vitro study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2015;6:161-165.
DOI
|
3 |
Karaokutan I, Sayin G, Kara O. In vitro study of fracture strength of provisional crown materials. J Adv Prosthodont. 2015;7:27-31.
DOI
|
4 |
Mai HN, Lee KB, Lee DH. Fit of interim crowns fabricated using photopolymer-jetting 3D printing. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;118:208-215.
DOI
|
5 |
Peng CC, Chung KH, Yau HT, Ramos V Jr. Assessment of the internal fit and marginal integrity of interim crowns made by different manufacturing methods. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123:514-522.
DOI
|
6 |
You SM, You SG, Kang SY, Bae SY, Kim JH. Evaluation of the accuracy (trueness and precision) of a maxillary trial denture according to the layer thickness: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.12.014 [Epub ahead of print]
DOI
|
7 |
Alharbi N, Osman R, Wismeijer D. Effects of build direction on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed complete coverage interim dental restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115:760-767.
DOI
|
8 |
Kim DY, Jeon JH, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Reproducibility of different arrangement of resin copings by dental microstereolithography: evaluating the marginal discrepancy of resin copings. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117:260-265.
DOI
|
9 |
ASTM. Standard terminology for additive manufacturing-general principles-terminology. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International, 2015. Report No.: ISO/ASTM52900-15.
|
10 |
You SG, You SM, Kang SY, Bae SY, Kim JH. Evaluation of the adaptation of complete denture metal bases fabricated with dental CAD-CAM systems: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.01.039 [Epub ahead of print]
DOI
|
11 |
Alharbi N, Osman RB, Wismeijer D. Factors influencing the dimensional accuracy of 3D-printed full-coverage dental restorations using stereolithography technology. Int J Prosthodont. 2016;29:503-510.
DOI
|
12 |
Revilla-Leon M, Ozcan M. Additive manufacturing technologies used for processing polymers: current status and potential application in prosthetic dentistry. J Prosthodont. 2019;28:146-158.
DOI
|
13 |
Yang Y, Yang Z, Zhou J, Chen L, Tan J. Effect of tooth preparation design on marginal adaptation of composite resin CAD-CAM onlays. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;124:88-93.
DOI
|
14 |
Wang W, Yu H, Liu Y, Jiang X, Gao B. Trueness analysis of zirconia crowns fabricated with 3-dimensional printing. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121:285-291.
DOI
|
15 |
Alharbi N, Alharbi S, Cuijpers VMJI, Osman RB, Wismeijer D. Three-dimensional evaluation of marginal and internal fit of 3D-printed interim restorations fabricated on different finish line designs. J Prosthodont Res. 2018;62:218-226.
DOI
|
16 |
Katheng A, Kanazawa M, Iwaki M, Minakuchi S. Evaluation of dimensional accuracy and degree of polymerization of stereolithography photopolymer resin under different postpolymerization conditions: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.02.023 [Epub ahead of print]
DOI
|
17 |
Kang SY, Park JH, Kim JH, Kim WC. Three-dimensional trueness analysis of ceramic crowns fabricated using a chairside computer-aided design/manufacturing system: an in vitro study. J Prosthodont Res. 2020;64:152-158.
DOI
|
18 |
Park GS, Kim SK, Heo SJ, Koak JY, Seo DG. Effects of printing parameters on the fit of implant-supported 3D printing resin prosthetics. Materials (Basel). 2019;12:2533.
DOI
|
19 |
Jeon JH. In vitro precision evaluation of blue light scanning of abutment teeth made with impressions and dental stone casts according to different 3D superimposition methods. J Prosthodont Res. 2020;64:368-372.
DOI
|
20 |
Kang SY, Park JH, Kim JH, Kim WC. Accuracy of provisional crowns made using stereolithography apparatus and subtractive technique. J Adv Prosthodont. 2018;10:354-360.
DOI
|
21 |
Ender A, Attin T, Mehl A. In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods of obtaining complete-arch dental impressions. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115:313-320.
DOI
|
22 |
Kaleli N, Ural C. Digital evaluation of laser scanning speed effects on the intaglio surface adaptation of laser-sintered metal frameworks. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123:874.e1-874.e7.
DOI
|
23 |
O'Toole S, Osnes C, Bartlett D, Keeling A. Investigation into the accuracy and measurement methods of sequential 3D dental scan alignment. Dent Mater. 2019;35:495-500.
DOI
|
24 |
Martorelli M, Gerbino S, Giudice M, Ausiello P. A comparison between customized clear and removable orthodontic appliances manufactured using RP and CNC techniques. Dent Mater. 2013;29:e1-e10.
|
25 |
Loflin WA, English JD, Borders C, Harris LM, Moon A, Holland JN, et al. Effect of print layer height on the assessment of 3D-printed models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019;156:283-289.
DOI
|
26 |
McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J. 1971;131:107-111.
DOI
|
27 |
Keating AP, Knox J, Bibb R, Zhurov AI. A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy. J Orthod. 2008;35:191-201.
DOI
|
28 |
Jang Y, Sim JY, Park JK, Kim WC, Kim HY, Kim JH. Accuracy of 3-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated on 3D-printed casts. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123:135-142.
DOI
|
29 |
Kirsch C, Ender A, Attin T, Mehl A. Trueness of four different milling procedures used in dental CAD/CAM systems. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21:551-558.
DOI
|