1 |
Goujat A, Abouelleil H, Colon P, Jeannin C, Pradelle N, Seux D, et al. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM inlay/onlay restorations: a systematic review of in vitro studies. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121:590-597.e3.
DOI
|
2 |
Fischer H, Weber M, Marx R. Lifetime prediction of allceramic bridges by computational methods. J Dent Res. 2003;82:238-242.
DOI
|
3 |
Park TH. A comparison of digital impression with conventional impression [master's thesis]. Seoul: Seoul National University, 2014.
|
4 |
Guth JF, Keul C, Stimmelmayr M, Beuer F, Edelhoff D. Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17:1201-1208.
DOI
|
5 |
Pradies G, Zarauz C, Valverde A, Ferreiroa A, Martinez- Rus F. Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions based on wavefront sampling technology. J Dent. 2015;43:201-208.
DOI
|
6 |
Abdel-Azim T, Rogers K, Elathamna E, Zandinejad A, Metz M, Morton D. Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology by using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114:554-559.
DOI
|
7 |
Kim DY, Jeon JH, Park JY, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Comparison of the marginal and internal gap of metal coping according to processing method of dental CAD/CAM system. J Dent Hyg Sci. 2015;15:12-17.
DOI
|
8 |
Kim KB, Kim SH, Kim JH. Marginal adaptation of Zirconium dioxide core according to the abutment teeth. J Dent Hyg Sci. 2015;15:54-59.
DOI
|
9 |
Chung IS, Jeon BW, Kim WY. Comparison of marginal fitness of zirconia copings according to impression techniques and zirconia blocks. J Korea Contents Assoc. 2016;16:151-157.
DOI
|
10 |
Laurent M, Scheer P, Dejou J, Laborde G. Clinical evaluation of the marginal fit of cast crowns--validation of the silicone replica method. J Oral Rehabil. 2008;35:116-122.
DOI
|
11 |
Park JY, Bae SY, Lee JJ, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Evaluation of the marginal and internal gaps of three different dental prostheses: comparison of the silicone replica technique and three-dimensional superimposition analysis. J Adv Prosthodont. 2017;9:159-169.
DOI
|
12 |
Kim DY, Sin CH, Jung ID, Kim JH, Kim WC. Evaluation of marginal and internal gap of Cobalt-Chromium sintering metal coping fabricated by dental CAD/CAM system. J Dent Hyg Sci. 2015;15:536-541.
DOI
|
13 |
Ghodsi S, Pirmoazen S, Beyabanaki E, Rostami M, Alikhasi M. The effect of milling metal versus milling wax on implant framework retention and adaptation. J Prosthodont. 2019;28:e739-e743.
DOI
|
14 |
McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J. 1971;131:107-111.
DOI
|
15 |
Yang JH, Yeo IS, Lee SH, Han JS, Lee JB. Marginal fit of Celay/in-Ceram, conventional In-Ceram and Empress 2 all-ceramic single crowns. J Korean Acad Prosthodont. 2002;40:131-139.
|
16 |
Besimo C, Jeger C, Guggenheim R. Marginal adaptation of titanium frameworks produced by CAD/CAM techniques. Int J Prosthodont. 1997;10:541-546.
|
17 |
Kim JE, Kim SY, Lee CH. The effect of heat and press-onmetal technique on marginal fit of metal-ceramic crown. J Korean Acad Prosthodont. 2014;52:90-96.
DOI
|
18 |
Kim KB, Kim JH, Kim WC, Kim HY, Kim JH. Evaluation of the marginal and internal gap of metal-ceramic crown fabricated with a selective laser sintering technology: two- and three-dimensional replica techniques. J Adv Prosthodont. 2013;5:179-186.
DOI
|