Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2020.42.3.213

Evaluation of surface treatment methods on the bond strength of veneer ceramic to the zirconia core  

Lee, Gwang-Young (Department of Dental Laboratory Technology, Wonkwang Health Science University)
Hong, Min-Ho (Department of Dental Laboratory Science, College of Health Science, Catholic University of Pusan)
Publication Information
Journal of Technologic Dentistry / v.42, no.3, 2020 , pp. 213-219 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to identify the impact of physical surface roughing with a polishing tool onto the pre-sintering yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystals (TZP) core and liner treatment for chemical bonding on the bond strength of TZP core and veneering ceramic. Methods: Overall, 80 specimens were classified into two groups (non-liner, NL; and usingliner, UL ) depending on the use of liner, and these two groups were then subclassified into four groups depending on the polishing tool used. (1) Non-liner groups: NS, non-liner+stone point; NC, non-liner+carbide bur; NP, non-liner+paper cone point; NT, non-liner+silicon point. (2) Using-liner groups: US, using-liner+stone point; UC, using-liner+carbide bur; UP, usingliner+paper cone point; UT, using-liner+silicon point. The pre-sintering surface roughing values and shapes were observed, and after burning up the veneering ceramic, the shear bond strength was measured using a universal testing machine. For significance testing, a one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's multiple comparison test were conducted. An optical microscope was used to observe the fracture plane, and the following results were obtained. Results: Surface roughness NP (4.09±0.51 ㎛) represented a higher value than other groups (p<0.001). In shear bond strength, NS (35.21±1.44 MPa) of the NL group showed the highest bond strength (p<0.001). The UL group did not show a statistically significant difference between groups (p=0.612). Conclusion: Our study findings reveal that the bond strength of TZP core and veneering ceramic was improved by pre-sintering physical surface treatment than by chemical bonding with liner surface treatment.
Keywords
Bond strength; Liner; Veneering ceramic; Zirconia;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Ozkurt Z, Iseri U, Kazazoglu E. Zirconia ceramic post systems: a literature review and a case report. Dent Mater J. 2010;29:233-245.   DOI
2 Guazzato M, Quach L, Albakry M, Swain MV. Influence of surface and heat treatments on the flexural strength of YTZP dental ceramic. J Dent. 2005;33:9-18.   DOI
3 Fischer J, Stawarczyk B, Hämmerle CH. Flexural strength of veneering ceramics for zirconia. J Dent. 2008;36:316-321.   DOI
4 Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Part II: zirconia veneering ceramics. Dent Mater. 2006;22:857-863.   DOI
5 Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Spiekermann H, Anusavice KJ. Marginal fit of alumina-and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system. Oper Dent. 2001;26:367-374.
6 White SN, Miklus VG, McLaren EA, Lang LA, Caputo AA. Flexural strength of a layered zirconia and porcelain dental all-ceramic system. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;94:125-131.   DOI
7 Dundar M, Ozcan M, Gokce B, Comlekoglu E, Leite F, Valandro LF. Comparison of two bond strength testing methodologies for bilayered all-ceramics. Dent Mater. 2007;23:630-636.   DOI
8 Al-Dohan HM, Yaman P, Dennison JB, Razzoog ME, Lang BR. Shear strength of core-veneer interface in bi-layered ceramics. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;91:349-355.   DOI
9 Tzanakakis EG, Tzoutzas IG, Koidis PT. Is there a potential for durable adhesion to zirconia restorations? A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115:9-19.   DOI
10 Luthardt RG, Holzhuter M, Sandkuhl O, Herold V, Schnapp JD, Kuhlisch E, et al. Reliability and properties of ground Y-TZP-zirconia ceramics. J Dent Res. 2002;81:487-491.   DOI
11 Santos RLP, Silva FS, Nascimento RM, Souza JCM, Motta FV, Carvalho O, et al. Shear bond strength of veneering porcelain to zirconia: Effect of surface treatment by CNC-milling and composite layer deposition on zirconia. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016;60:547-556.   DOI
12 Sundh A, Sjogren G. A comparison of fracture strength of yttrium-oxide- partially-stabilized zirconia ceramic crowns with varying core thickness, shapes and veneer ceramics. J Oral Rehabil. 2004;31:682-688.   DOI
13 Gonulol N, Yilmaz F. The effects of finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness and color stability of nanocomposites. J Dent. 2012;40 Suppl 2:e64-e70.   DOI
14 Abrisham SM, Fallah Tafti A, Kheirkhah S, Tavakkoli MA. Shear bond strength of porcelain to a base-metal compared to Zirconia core. J Dent Biomater. 2017;4:367-372.
15 Zaher AM, Hochstedler JL, Rueggeberg FA, Kee EL. Shear bond strength of zirconia-based ceramics veneered with 2 different techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;118:221-227.   DOI
16 Hallmann L, Ulmer P, Lehmann F, Wille S, Polonskyi O, Johannes M, et al. Effect of surface modifications on the bond strength of zirconia ceramic with resin cement resin. Dent Mater. 2016;32:631-639.   DOI
17 Derand T, Molin M, Kvam K. Bond strength of composite luting cement to zirconia ceramic surfaces. Dent Mater. 2005;21:1158-1162.   DOI
18 Craciunescu E, Sinescu C, Negrutiu ML, Pop DM, Lauer HC, Rominu M, et al. Shear bond strength tests of zirconia veneering ceramics after chipping repair. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2016;30:666-676.   DOI
19 Aboushelib MN, de Jager N, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Dent Mater. 2005;21:984-991.   DOI
20 Saito A, Komine F, Blatz MB, Matsumura H. A comparison of bond strength of layered veneering porcelains to zirconia and metal. J Prosthet Dent. 2010;104:247-257.   DOI