Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2020.42.1.9

Assessment of inlay ceramic restorations manufactured using the hot-pressing method  

Lee, Beom-Il (Department of Dental Laboratory Science & Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University)
You, Seung-Gyu (Department of Dental Laboratory Science & Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University)
You, Seung-Min (Department of Dental Laboratory Science & Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University)
Park, Dong-In (Department of Dental Laboratory Science & Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University)
Kim, Ji-Hwan (Department of Dental Laboratory Science & Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University)
Publication Information
Journal of Technologic Dentistry / v.42, no.1, 2020 , pp. 9-16 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate ceramic inlay produced by heat pressing that inlay pattern made by subtractive manufacturing and additive manufacturing method. Methods: A mandibular lower first molar that mesial occlusal cavity (MO cavity) die was prepared. After fabricating an epoxy resin model using a silicone impression material, epoxy resin die was scanned with a dental model scanner to design an MO cavity inlay. The designed STL pile was used to fabricate wax patterns and resin patterns, and then lithium disilicate ceramic inlays were fabricated using hot-press method. For the measurement of the marginal and internal gap of the lithium disilicate, silicone replica method was applied, and gap was measured through an optical microscope (x 80). Data were tested for significant differences using the Mann-Whitney Utest. Results: The marginal fit was 103.56±9.92㎛ in the MIL-IN group and 81.57±9.33㎛ in the SLA-IN group, with a significant difference found between the two groups (p<0.05). The internal fit was 120.99±17.52㎛ in the MIL-IN group and 99.18±6.65㎛ in the SLA-IN group, with a significant difference found between the two groups (p<0.05). Conclusion: It is clinically more appropriate to apply the additive manufacturing than subtractive manufacturing method in producing lithium disilicate inlay using CAD/CAM system.
Keywords
Additive manufacturing; Internal; Lithium Disilicate; Marginal; Silicone replica; Stereolithography apparatus;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 5  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Alharbi N, Wismeijer D, Osman RB. Additive Manufacturing Techniques in Prosthodontics: Where Do We Currently Stand? A Critical Review. Int J Prosthodont, 30(5), 474-484, 2017.   DOI
2 Boening KW, Wolf BH, Schmidt AE, Kastner K, Walter MH. Clinical fit of Procera AllCeram crowns. J Prosthet Dent, 84(4), 419-424, 2000.   DOI
3 Bottino MA, Campos F, Ramos NC, Rippe MP, Valandro LF, Melo RM. Inlays made from a hybrid material: adaptation and bond strengths. Oper Dent, 40(3), 83-91, 2015.
4 Galante R, Figueiredo-Pina CG, Serro AP. Additive manufacturing of ceramics for dental applications: A review. Dent Mater, 35(6), 825-846, 2019.   DOI
5 Grenade C, Mainjot A, Vanheusden A. Fit of single tooth zirconia copings: comparison between various manufacturing processes. J Prosthet Dent. 105(4), 249-255, 2011.   DOI
6 Hallmann L, Ulmer P, Gerngross MD, Jetter J, Mintrone M, Lehmann F, Kern M. Properties of hot-pressed lithium silicate glass-ceramics. Dent Mater, 35(5), 713-729, 2019.   DOI
7 Heymann HO, Bayne SC, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD, Roberson TM. The clinical performance of CAD-CAM-generated ceramic inlays: a four-year study. J Am Dent Assoc, 127(8), 1171-1175, 1996.   DOI
8 Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent, 62(4), 405-408, 1989.   DOI
9 Homsy FR, Ozcan M, Khoury M, Majzoub ZA. Comparison of fit accuracy of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated from wax or resin patterns with conventional and CAD-CAM technologies. J Prosthet Dent, 120(4), 530-536, 2018.   DOI
10 Kaleli N, Ural C, Ozkoylu G, Duran I. Effect of layer thickness on the marginal and internal adaptation of laser-sintered metal frameworks. J Prosthet Dent, 121(6), 922-928, 2019.   DOI
11 Kang W, Park JK, Kim SR, Kim WC, Kim JH. Effects of core and veneer thicknesses on the color of CAD-CAM lithium disilicate ceramics. J Prosthet Dent, 119(3), 461-466, 2018.   DOI
12 Kim DY, Jeon JH, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Reproducibility of different arrangement of resin copings by dental microstereolithography: Evaluating the marginal discrepancy of resin copings. J Prosthet Dent, 117(2), 260-265, 2017.   DOI
13 Kim DY, Jeon JH, Park JY, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Comparison of the marginal and internal gap of metal coping according to processing method of dental CAD/CAM System. J Dent Hyg Sci, 15(1), 12-17, 2015.   DOI
14 Kim JH, Kim KB. Influence of final crystallization process on precision of fit of monolithic CAD/CAM-generated restorations by lithium disilicate: A comparative study. J Kor Aca of Den Tec, 41(4), 271-278, 2019.   DOI
15 Molin M, Karlsson S. The fit of gold inlays and three ceramic inlay systems: A clinical and in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand, 51(4), 201-206, 1993.   DOI
16 Kim KB. Evaluation of clinical adaptation of dental prostheses printed by 3-dimensional printing technology. J Kor Aca of Den Tec, 41(1), 1-7, 2019.   DOI
17 Mai HN, Lee KB, Lee DH. Fit of interim crowns fabricated using photopolymer-jetting 3D printing. J Prosthet Dent, 118(2), 208-215, 2017.   DOI
18 McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J, 131(3), 107-111, 1971.   DOI
19 Nawafleh NA, Mack F, Evans J, Mackay J, Hatamleh MM. Accuracy and reliability of methods to measure marginal adaptation of crowns and FDPs: a literature review. J Prosthodont, 22(5), 419-428, 2013.   DOI
20 Ngo TD, Kashani A, Imbalzano G, Nguyen KT, Hui D. Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Compos. Part B Eng, 143, 172-196, 2018.   DOI
21 Revilla LM, Ozcan M. Additive manufacturing technologies used for processing polymers: current status and potential application in prosthetic dentistry. J Prosthodont, 28(2), 146-158, 2019.   DOI
22 Rippe MP, Monaco C, Volpe L, Bottino MA, Scotti R, Valandro LF. Different methods for inlay production: effect on internal and marginal adaptation, adjustment time, and contact point. Oper Dent, 42(4), 436-444, 2017.   DOI
23 Schaefer O, Decker M, Wittstock F, Kuepper H, Guentsch A. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro. J Dent, 42(6), 677-683, 2014.   DOI
24 Yang Y, Yu J, Gao J, Guo J, Li L, Zhao Y, Zhang S. Clinical outcomes of different types of tooth-supported bilayer lithium disilicate all-ceramic restorations after functioning up to 5 years: a retrospective study. J Dent, 51, 56-61, 2016.   DOI
25 Shamseddine L, Mortada R, Rifai K, Chidiac JJ. Fit of pressed crowns fabricated from two CAD-CAM wax pattern process plans: A comparative in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent, 118(1), 49-54, 2017.   DOI
26 Sorensen JA. A standardized method for determination of crown margin fidelity. J Prosthet Dent, 64(1), 18-24, 1990.   DOI