Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2019.41.2.53

Comparison of the accuracy of domestic dental intra-oral scanner(e-scanner) and model scanner  

Kim, Busob (Department of Dental Laboratory Science, Catholic University of Pusan)
Kim, Jungho (Department of Dental Laboratory Science, Catholic University of Pusan)
Publication Information
Journal of Technologic Dentistry / v.41, no.2, 2019 , pp. 53-61 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the discrepancy of scan process in dental intra oral scanner by comparing model scanner and anticipate possibility to introduce intra oral scan technique. Methods: 3D superimposition test was conducted to compare the scan discrepancy. The scanners used in this study are the e-oral scanner, the D750 model scanner, and the high precision CMM(3D Coordinate Measuring Machine). The standard of accuracy verification is ISO 5725-1; trueness and precision. Master model was manufactured by dental stone and scanned 5 times by intra oral, model scanner. Reference data was scanned 5 times by high accuracy CMM to evaluate the trueness. Results: Trueness of D750 scanner were $7.4{\mu}m$ $5.1{\mu}m$ $6.8{\mu}m$ at an abutment, an occluasal, a specific area. and trueness of e-scanner were $20.2{\mu}m$ $27.4{\mu}m$ $37.8{\mu}m$ at an abutment, an occluasal, a specific area. Precision of D750 scanner was $7.04{\mu}m$, e-scanner was $15.95{\mu}m$. Conclusion: When conducting in vitro test, The mean difference of trueness between e-scanner and D750 were $12.8{\mu}m$ at an abutment area, $22.3{\mu}m$ at an occlusal area, $31.0{\mu}m$ at a specific area and $8.91{\mu}m$ in precision. The scan discrepancies are within the range of clinical acceptance.
Keywords
accuracy; dental CAD/CAM system; fitness; intra-oral scanner; model scanner;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 7  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Kim JH, Jung JK, Kim KB. Evaluation of validity of three dimensional dental digital model made from blue LED dental scanner. J Kor Aca Ind Society 15(5), 3007-3013, 2014.
2 Kim JH, Oh S, Uhm SH, Min B. Evaluation of comparable scanning accuracy in various intraoral scanner systems: An example of ADA 132 standard model. J Dent Mat, 44(3), 247-254, 2017.
3 Kim KB, Kim JH. Evaluations of the accuracy and reliability of measurements made on white light scanner-based dental digital models. J Kor contents Aca, 12(10), 357-364, 2012.
4 Kim SH, Kim JH, Kim CK. Reliability and accuracy of digital impression obtained from CS-3500 intraoral scanner. J Dent Hyg Sci, 15(5), 673-678, 2015.   DOI
5 Kim WT, Lee BK, Hyun JK, Kim KB. Evaluation of validity of polyurethan model fabricated by intra-oral scanning method. J KADT, 36(2), 91-96, 2014.
6 Kuhr F, Schmidt A, Rehmann P, Wostmann B. A new method for assessing the accuracy of full arch impressions in patients. J Dent. 55, 68-74, 2016.   DOI
7 Lee JJ, Park JY, Bae SY, Jeon JH, Kim JH, Kim WC. Evaluation of the model accuracy according to three type of dental scanner. J Dent Hyg Sci, 15(2), 226-231, 2015.   DOI
8 Lim JH, Park JM, Kim MJ, Heo SJ, Myung JY. Comparison of digital intraoral scanner reproducibility and image trueness considering repetitive experience. J Prosthet Dent, 119(2), 225-232, 2018.   DOI
9 Nedelcu R, Persson A. Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: An in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis. J Prosthet Dent, 112(6), 1461-1471, 2014.   DOI
10 Papadiochou S, Pissiotis AL. Marginal adaptation and CAD-CAM technology: A systematic review of restorative material and fabrication techniques. J Prosthet Dent, in press, 1-7, 2018.
11 Renne W, Ludlow M, Fryml J, Schurch Z, Mennito A, Kessler R, Lauer A. Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons. J Prosthet Dent, 118(1), 36-42, 2017.   DOI
12 Wahle WM, Masri R, Driscoll C, Elain Romberg, J Prosthet Dent, 119(5), 777-782, 2018.   DOI
13 Yoon HI, Lee SM, Park EJ. Comparison of patient satisfaction with digital and conventional impression for prosthodontic treatment. J Kor Aca Pros, 54(4), 379-386, 2016.   DOI
14 Fukazawa S, Odaira C, Kondo H, Investigation of accuracy and reproducibility of abutment position by intraoral scanners. J Prosthodontic Research, 61(4), 450-459, 2017.   DOI
15 Arakida T, Kanazawa M, Iwaki M, Suzuki T, Minakuchi S. Evaluating the influence of ambient light on scanning trueness, precision, and time of intra oral scanner. J Prosthodont Reaserch, 62, 324-329, 2018.   DOI
16 Bohner LO, Canto GD, Marcio BS, Lagana DC, Sesma N, Neto PT. Computer-aided analysis of digital dental impressions obtained from intraoral and extraoral scanners. J Prosthet Dent, 118(5), 617-623, 2017.   DOI
17 Choi SS, Kim KB, Lee GT, Jeon JH, Kim JH. The study on the dimensional stability of digitized dental stone replicas according to difference color of gypsum materials. J KADT, 34(4), 369-377, 2012.
18 Choi SS, Kim JHa, Kim JHb. Comparative analysis on digital models obtained by white light and blue LED optical scanners. J KADT, 36(1), 17-23, 2014.
19 Dahl BE, Ronald HJ, Dahl JE. Internal fit of single crowns produced by CAD-CAM and lostwax metal casting technique assessed by the triple-scan protocol. J Prosthet Dent, 117(3), 400-404, 2017.   DOI
20 Hayama H, Fueki K, Wadachi J, Wakabayashi N. Trueness and precision of digital impressions obtained using an intraoral scanner with different head size in the partially edentulous mandible. J Prosthodontic Research, 62(3), 347-352, 2018.   DOI
21 Jeon JH, Hwang KS, Min BK, Hwang JS, Kim JH, Kim WC. Comparison of reproducibility of prepared tooth impression scanning utilized with white and blue light scanners. J KADT, 37(4), 213-218, 2015.
22 Jeon JH, Hwang SS, Kim CM, Kim DY, Kim JH, Kim WC. Comparative evaluation of repeatability of scanning abutment tooth stone model and impression : Applied assessment of CAD/CAM ISO standard in dentistry. J KADT, 39(1), 1-7, 2017.