Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2017.39.1.17

Assessment of internal fitness on resin copings fabricated by 3 - ways methods: Three - dimensional analysis  

Kang, Seen-young (Department of Dental Laboratory Science & Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University)
Park, Jin-Young (Institute for Health Science, College of Public Health Science, Korea University)
Kim, Dong-Yeon (Department of Dental Laboratory Science & Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University)
Kim, Woong-Chul (Department of Dental Laboratory Science & Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University)
Publication Information
Journal of Technologic Dentistry / v.39, no.1, 2017 , pp. 17-24 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the internal fitness of the resin coping that was fabricated by the traditional and Digital manufacturing methods through 3-dimensional analysis. Methods: maxillary right second molar was chosen implant master model. Custom-built impression trays were manufactured. After screwing the pick-up impression coping onto the master cast, impressions were made with silicone impression. The Working model was then made with type IV stone. The coping was fabricated: SLAC group (n=8), APPC group (n=8), LAPC group (n=8) Resin coping data was measured by using a three-dimensional evaluation program. Internal fitness was calculated by RMS (Root Mean Square).It measures mean and Standard Deviation (SD). Results: Three groups are measured $47.11{\pm}(3.08){\mu}m$ total RMS of SLAC group, $48.35({\pm}1.55{\mu}m)$ for total RMS of LAPC group, $43.45{\pm}2.09{\mu}m$ for total RMS of APPC group. Measured value is gradually increased. Followed by autopolymerized pattern resin; Stereolithography resin, Light-activated pattern resin But there were no differences stastically(P>0.321). Conclusion: Evaluation of internal fitness on Resin copings was fabricated by three-ways methods showed that no differences statistically significant and clinically acceptable results.
Keywords
Light-activated pattern resin; Autopolymerized pattern resin; Stereolithography; 3D-mensional analysis; Coping;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Chae GJ, Jung UW, Kim CS, Shim JS, Cho KS, Kim CK, Choi SH. Retrospective analysis of frialit-$2^{(R)}$ implant system placed in maxilla. Journal of Korean Academy of Periodontology, 35(2), 2005.
2 JOrgensen KD. Oon T. Distortion of wax crowns. Eur J Oral Sci, 92(3), 253-256, 1984.   DOI
3 Jung JK, Lee SO, Kim KB. Evaluation of shear bond strength between metal core fabricated by 3D printing and dental porcelain. J Korea Acad Industr Coop Soc, 16(4), 2585-2592, 2015.   DOI
4 Kuroda TN, Motohashi Tominaga R, Iwata K. Three-dimensional dental cast analyzing system using laser scanning. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 110(4), 365-369, 1996.   DOI
5 Ness EJ , Nicholls JE, Rubenstein DS. Accuracy of the acrylic resin pattern for the implantretained prosthesis. Int J Prosthodont 5(6), 1992.
6 Pagniano RP, Scheid RC, Clowson RL, Dagefoerde RO, Zardiackas LD. Linear dimensional change of acrylic resins used in the fabrication of custom trays. J Prostthet Dent, 47(3), 279-283, 1982.   DOI
7 Persson A, Andersson M, Oden A, Sandborgh-Englund G. A three-dimensional evaluation of a laser scanner and a touch-probe scanner. J Prosthet Dent, 95(3), 194-200, 2006.   DOI
8 Rajagopal P, Chitre V, Aras MA. A comparison of the accuracy of patterns processed from an inlay casting wax, an auto-polymerized resin and a light-cured resin pattern material. Indian J Dent Res, 23(2), 152, 2012.   DOI
9 Schaefer O, Watts DC, Sigusch BW, Kuepper H, Guentsch A. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate partial crowns in vitro: a three-dimensional analysis of accuracy and reproducibility. Dentmater, 28(3), 320-326, 2012.
10 Shillingburg H, Hobo S, Whitsett L, Jacobi R, Brackett S. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. Chicago, Quintessence, ISBN 0-86715-201-X, 1997.
11 Sorensen JA. A standardized method for determination of crown margin fidelity. J Prosthet Dent, 64(1), 18-24, 1990.   DOI
12 Turkyilmaz I. A comparison between insertion torque and resonance frequency in the assessment of torque capacity and primary stability of Branemark system implants. J Oral Rehabil, 33(10), 754-759, 2006.   DOI
13 Van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital, Dental materials, 28(1), 3-12, 2012.   DOI
14 Chae G J, Jung UW, Kim CS, Shim JS, Cho KS, Kim CK, Choi SH. Retrospective analysis of frialit-2(R) implant system placed in maxilla. J Korean Acad Periodontol, 35(2), 2005.
15 Pattern GC. Resin LS low shrinkage modelling resin tips and tricks: technique and handling of GC Pattern Resin. 2009.
16 Kim CM, Jeon JH, Lee JJ, Kim JH, Kim WC. Precision evaluation of crown prosthesis manufactured by two bur and three bur. The Journal of the Korea Academy of Dental Technology, 38(2), 57-62, 2016.
17 Bae SY, Park JY, Jeong ID, Kim HY, Kim JH, Kim WC. Three-dimensional analysis of marginal and internal fit of copings fabricated with polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) and zirconia. J Prosthodont Res, 2016.
18 Berger U. Aspects of accuracy and precision in the additive manufacturing of plastic gears. Virtual phys prototype 10(2), 49-57, 2015.   DOI
19 Cahi E, Rosen M, Becker P. A comparison of the dimensional stability of three inlay pattern materials. J Dent Assoc S Afr, 82(6), 337-342, 1996.
20 Cox J. and G. Zarb. The longitudinal clinical efficacy of osseointegrated dental implants: a 3-year report. Int Oral Maxillpfac Implants, 2(2), 1987.
21 DeLong R, Heinzen M, Hodges J, Ko CC, Douglas W. Accuracy of a system for creating 3D computer models of dental arches. J Dent Res, 438-442, 2003.