Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2015.37.1.9

The comparison of accuracy on three-unit fixed dental prosthesis made with CAD/CAM milling machines  

Bae, So-Yeon (Department of Dental Laboratory Science & Engineering, College of Health Science, Graduate School, Korea University)
Park, Jin-Young (Department of Dental Laboratory Science & Engineering, College of Health Science, Graduate School, Korea University)
Kim, Ji-Hwan (Department of Dental Laboratory Science & Engineering, College of Health Science, Graduate School, Korea University)
Kim, Hae-Young (Department of Dental Laboratory Science & Engineering, College of Health Science, Graduate School, Korea University)
Kim, Myung-Bae (Korea academy of CAD/CAM Dental technology)
Kim, Woong-Chul (Department of Dental Laboratory Science & Engineering, College of Health Science, Graduate School, Korea University)
Publication Information
Journal of Technologic Dentistry / v.37, no.1, 2015 , pp. 9-15 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of the maxillary three-unit fixed dental prosthesis (FDPs) made using two CAD/CAM milling machines : DCM Group(Dentaim CAD/CAM milling machine), WCM Group(Wieland CAD/CAM milling machine). Methods: Each of 10 duplicate models was scanned by blue light scanner(Identica, Medit, Korea), and the three-unit FDPs (STL file) was designed using DelcamCAD. A total of 20 three-unit FDPs was fabricated, comprising 2 groups of 10 specimens each (shrinkage ratio is 1:1). The first three-unit FDPs STL file was used as a CAD reference model (CRM). Obtained STL files by scanning the inner surface of three-unit FDPs were convened into the point clouds-ASC II files. Discrepancies between the point clouds and CRM were measured by superimposition software. Statistical methods to analyze the data were used non-parametric method. The mean (SD) values were compared by a Mann-Whitney U-test. Type one error rate was set at 0.05. Results: WCM group had small discrepancies with $2.17{\mu}m$ of mean value compared to $4.44{\mu}m$ in DCM group. The accuracy values between the two groups showed a sratistically significant difference (Table 2, p<.05). Conclusion: The accuracy of the three-unit fixed dental prosthesis(FDPs) made of two CAD/CAM milling machines were statistically different. Accuracy with which the prosthesis made of WCM group was superior.
Keywords
Dental CAD/CAM system; Accuracy; Three-dimensional superimposition analysis;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Addison O, Cao X, Sunnar P, Fleming GJP. Machining variability impacts on the strength of a "chair-side" CAD-CAM ceramic. Dent Mater, 28(8), 880-887, 2012.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J, 204(9), 505-511, 2008.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Boening KW, Wolf BH, Schmidt AE, Kastner K, Walter MH. Clinical fit of Procera AllCeram crowns. J Prosthet Dent, 84(4), 419-424, 2000.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Bosch G, Ender A, Mehl A. A 3-dimensional accuracy analysis of chairside CAD/CAM milling processes. J Prosthet Dent, 112(6), 1425-1431, 2014.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Cho HD, Jun YT, Yang MY. Five-axis CNC milling for effective machining of sculptured surfaces. Int J Prod Res, 31(11), 2559-2573, 1993.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Delong R, Heinzen M, Hodges JS, Ko CC, Douglas WH. Accuracy of a system for creating 3D computer models of dental arches. J Dent Res, 82(6), 438-442, 2003.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Gonzalo E, Suarez MJ, Serrano B, Lozano JF. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation. J Prosthet Dent, 102(6), 378-384, 2009.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Grenade C, Mainjot A, Vanheusden A. Fit of single tooth zirconia copings: comparison between various manufacturing processes. J Prosthet Dent, 105(4), 249-255, 2011.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Huh JB, Park CG, Kim HY, Park CK, Shin SW. Evaluation using Replica Technique on the marginal and internal fitness of zirconia cores by several CAD/CAM systems, J Adv Prosthodont, 48(2), 135-142, 2010.
10 Hung SH, Hung KS, Eick JD, Chappel RP. Marginal fit of porcelain-fused-to metal and two types of ceramic crown. J proshet Dent, 63(1), 26-31, 1990.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Keshvad A, Hooshmand T, Asefzadeh F, Khalilinejad F, Alihemmati M, Van Noort R. Marginal gap, internal fit, and fracture load of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by CEREC inLab and hot pressed techniques. J Prosthodont, 20(7), 535-540, 2011.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Lee KB, Park CW, Kim KH, Kwon TY. Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic crowns fabricated with two different CAD/CAM systems. Dent Mater J, 27(3), 422-426, 2008.   DOI
13 Miyazaki T, HOtta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent mater J, 28(1), 44-56, 2009.   DOI
14 Persson M, Andersson M, Bergman B. The accuracy of a high-precision digitizer for CAD/CAM of crowns. J Prosthet Dent, 74(3), 223-229, 1995.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Sturdevant JR, Bayne SC, Heymann HO. Margin gap size of ceramic inlays using secondgeneration CAD/CAM equipment. J Esthet Dent, 11(4), 206-214, 1999.   DOI
16 Quintas AF, Oliveira F, Bottino MA. Vertical marginal discrepancy of ceramic copings with different ceramic materials, finish lines, and luting agents: an in vitro evaluation. J Prosthet Dent, 92(3), 250-257, 2004.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Schaefer O, Kuepper H, Thompson GA, Cachovan G, Hefti AF, Guentsch A. Effect of CNCmilling on the marginal and internal fit of dental ceramics: A pilot study. Dent Mat, 29(8), 851-858, 2013.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Sjogren G. Marginal and internal fit of four different types of ceramic inlays after luting: an in vitro study. Acta Odontologica, 53(1), 24-28, 1995.   DOI