Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2014.36.2.83

Effect of modeling liquid on the shear-bond strength of zirconia core - porcelain veneer  

Choi, Byung-Hwan (Department of Dental Technology, Deagu Health College)
Kim, Im-Sun (Department of Dental Technology, Deagu Health College)
Publication Information
Journal of Technologic Dentistry / v.36, no.2, 2014 , pp. 83-89 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: This study is to evaluate the effect of modeling liquid on the shear-bond strength between zirconia core and veneering ceramic. Methods: Disk-shaped (diameter: 12.0mm; height: 3.0mm) zirconia were randomly divided into six groups according to the surface conditioning method and whether modeling liquid is used or not to be applied (N=60, n=10 per group): group 1-control group with distilled water(ZD); group 2-control group with modeling liquid(ZM); group 3-airborne particle abrasion with $110-{\mu}m$ $Al_2O_3$(AD) with distilled water; group 4-airborne particle abrasion with $110-{\mu}m$ $Al_2O_3$ with modeling liquid(AM); group 5-liner with distilled water(LD); group $6{\pounds}{\neq}liner$ with modeling liquid(LM). Contact angles were determined by the sessile drop method at room temperature using a contact angle measurement apparatus. The specimens were prepared using dentin veneering ceramics, veneered, 3mm high and 2.8mm in diameter, over the cores. The shear bond strength test was performed in a Shear bond test machine. Load was applied at a cross-head speed of 0.50mm/min until failure. The fractured zirconia surfaces were evaluated by using stereomicroscope (${\times}30$). Collected data were analyzed using SPSS(Statistical Package for Social Sciences) Win 12.0 statistics program. Results: ZD showed the highest contact angle($50.6{\pm}5.4^{\circ}$) and LD showed the lowest value($6.7{\pm}1.3^{\circ}$). Control groups and zirconia liner groups were significantly higher contact angle than liner groups(p<0.05). LD was the highest shear bond strength($43.9{\pm}3.8MPa$) and ZD was the lowest shear bond strength($24.8{\pm}4.9MPa$). Shear bond strengths of control groups and contact angle of liner groups were not significantly different((p>0.05). Liner groups presented adhesive failures. The others groups showed cohesive and adhesive failures. Conclusion: Modeling liquid groups showed lower contact angles and lower shear bond strength compared to those of distilled water groups.
Keywords
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered allceramic restorations. Part II: Zirconia veneering ceramics. Dent Mater, 22, 857-63, 2006.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Daftary F., Donovan T. Effect of four pretreatment techniques on porcelain-to-metal bond strength. J Prosthet Dent 58, 535-40, 1986.
3 Dundar M, Ozcan M, Gokce B, Comlekogelu E, Leite F, Valandro LF. Comparison of two bond strength testing methodologies for bilayered all-ceramics. Dent Mater, 23, 630-6, 2007.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Harding AB, Norling BK, Teixeira EC. The effect of surface treatment of the interfacial surface on fatigue-related microtensile bond strength of milled zirconia to veneering porcelain. J Prosthodont, 21(5), 346-52, 2012.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Jens Fischer, Philipp Grohmann, Bogna Stwarczyk. Effect of zirconia surface treatments on the shear strength of zirconia/veneering ceramic composites. Dental Materials Journal, 27(3), 448-454, 2008.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Kim CH, Jeon YC, Joeng CM, Lim JS. Effect of surface treatments of zirconia ceramic on the bond strength of resin cements. J Korean Academy of Prosthodontics, 42, 386-96, 2005.   과학기술학회마을
7 Mi-Sun Cho, Young-Soo Kim, Kyu-Won Suh, Jae-Jun Ryu. Effect of surface treatmet on the shear bond strength of a zirconia core to veneering ceramic. J Korean Academy of Prosthodontics, 47, 199-205, 2009.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Naoyoshi Tarumi., Motohiro Uo, Eiji Yamaga, Fumio Watari. SEM observation and wettability of variously processed and fractured surface of dental zirconia. Applied Surface Science, 262, 253-257, 2012   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Piconi C, Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials, 20:1-25, 1999.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Vult von Steyern P, Carlson P, Nilner K. Allceramic fixed partial dentures designed according to the DC-Zirkon technique. A 2-year clinical study. J Oral Rehabil, 32, 180-7, 2005.   DOI   ScienceOn