Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2014.36.1.17

Comparative analysis on digital models obtained by white light and blue LED optical scanners  

Choi, Seog-Soon (Dept. of Dental Technology, Shingu University)
Kim, Jae-Hong (Dept. of Health Science Specialized in Dental Lab. Science & Engineering, Graduate School, Korea University)
Kim, Ji-Hwan (Dept. of Health Science Specialized in Dental Lab. Science & Engineering, Graduate School, Korea University)
Publication Information
Journal of Technologic Dentistry / v.36, no.1, 2014 , pp. 17-23 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze and compare the relative accuracy of digitized stone models of lower full arch, using two different scanning system. Methods: Replica stone models(N=20) were produced from lower arch acrylic model. Twenty digital models were made with the white light and blue LED($Medit^{(R)}$, Korea) scanner. Two-dimensional distance between the landmarks were measured on the Delcam $CopyCAD^{(R)}$(Delcam plc, UK). Independent samples t-test was applied for comparison of the groups. All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS software package(Statistical Package for Social Sciences for Windows, version 12.0). Results: The absolute disagreement between measurements made directly on the two different scanner-based dental digital models was 0.02~0.04mm, and was not statistically significant(P>0.05). Conclusion: The precision of the blue LED optical scanner was comparable with the digitization device, and relative accuracy was similar. However, there still is room for improvement and further standardization of dental CAD technologies.
Keywords
blue LED; optical scanner; relative accuracy; white light;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Zilberman O, Huggare JA, Parikakis KA. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three - dimensional virtual orthodontic models. Angle Orthod, 73(3), 301-306, 2003.
2 Stevens DR, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Raboud DW, Heo G, Major PW. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 129(2), 794-803, 2006.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Alcan T, Ceylanoglu C, Baysal B. The relationship between digital model accuracy and timedependent deformation of alginate impressions. Angle Orthod, 79(1), 30-36, 2009.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Dental CAD-CAM, Identica Blue Led information, Germany. http: //www.dentalcadcameshop.com/Identica-Blue-Led, 2014.
5 Christensen GJ. Impressions are changing, deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling. J Am Dent Assoc, 140(10), 1301-1304, 2009.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Creed B, Chung HK, Jeryl DE, James JX, Lee A. Comparison of the accuracy of linear measurement obtained from cone beam computerized tomography images and digital models. Semin Orthod, 17(2), 49-56, 2011.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Delong R, Heinzen M, Hodges JS, Ko CC, Douglas WH. Accuracy of a system for creating 3D computer models of dental arches. J Dent Res, 90(1), 434-440, 2003.
8 Kim JH, Kim JH, Kim HY. A study on common errors in digital impressions: An example of CEREC AC. J Korean Acad Dent Tech, 33(3), 211-218, 2011.
9 Lee KT, Kim JH, Kim WC, Kim JH. Threedimensional evaluation on the repeatability and reproducibility of dental scanner-based digital models. J Korean Acad Dent Tech, 34(2), 213-220, 2012.   DOI
10 Luthardt RG, Koch R, Rudolph H, Walter MH. Qualitative computer aided evaluation of dental impressions in vivo. J Dent, 22(4), 69-76, 2006.
11 Luthardt RG, Walter MH, Weber A, Koch R, Rudolph H. Clinical parameters influencing the accuracy of 1- and 2- stage impressions: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Prosthodont, 21(4), 322-327, 2008.
12 May KB, Russell MM, Razzoog ME, Lang BR. Precision of fit: the Procera AllCeram crown. J Prosthet Dent, 80(2), 394-404, 1993.
13 Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J, 28(1), 44-56, 2009.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Motohashi N, Kuroda T. A 3D computer-aided design system applied to diagnosis and treatment planning in orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. European J Orthod, 21(3), 263-274, 1999.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Quimby ML, Vig KW, Rashid RG, Firestone AR. The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models. Angle Orthod, 74(2), 298-303, 2004.
16 Santoro M, Galkin, M. Teredesai, Nicolay OF, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 124(1), 101-105, 2003.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Persson A, Andersson M, Oden A, Sandborgh-Englund G. A three-dimensional evaluation of a scanner and a touch-probe scanner. J Prosthet Dent, 95(3), 194-200, 2006.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry, an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J, 204(9), 505-511, 2008.   DOI   ScienceOn