Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2011.33.4.299

Study about shear bond strength of zirconia core used in dental prosthesis  

Sim, Ji-Young (Department of Health Science Specialized in Dental Lab. Science & Engineering, Graduate School, Korea University)
Kim, Jae-Hong (Department of Health Science Specialized in Dental Lab. Science & Engineering, Graduate School, Korea University)
Kim, Woong-Chul (Department of Health Science Specialized in Dental Lab. Science & Engineering, Graduate School, Korea University)
Kim, Hae-Young (Department of Health Science Specialized in Dental Lab. Science & Engineering, Graduate School, Korea University)
Kim, Ji-Hwan (Department of Health Science Specialized in Dental Lab. Science & Engineering, Graduate School, Korea University)
Publication Information
Journal of Technologic Dentistry / v.33, no.4, 2011 , pp. 299-306 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the shear bond strength by manufacturing the veneering porcelain on the IPS e.max $ZirCAD^{(R)}$ zirconia core, using the layering technique and heat-pressing technique, and to evaluate the clinical stability by comparing to the conventional metal ceramic system. Methods: The Schmitz-Schulmeyer test method was used to evaluate the core-veneer shear bond strength of zirconia core ceramic(IPS e.max $ZirCAD^{(R)}$) and their manufacture recommended two veneering ceramic systems(IPS e.max $ceram^{(R)}$, IPS e. max $ZirPress^{(R)}$). A metal ceramic system(Bellabond $plus^{(R)}$, VITA $VM13^{(R)}$) was used as a control group for the two all ceramic system test groups. The maximum loading and shear bond strength was measured. The average shear strength(MPa) was analyzed with the one-way ANOVA and the Tukey's test(${\alpha}$=.05). The fracture specimens were examined using Microscope to determine the failure pattern. Results: The mean shear bond strengths(SD) in MPa were MBSB control 43.62(2.13); ZBSB 18.65(1.76); ZPSB 18.89(1.54). The shear strengths of the zirconia cores were not significantly different(P>.05). Microscope examination showed that zirconia specimens presented mixed failure, and base metal alloy specimens showed adhesive failure. Conclusion: There was no siginificant different between the layering technique and the heat pressing technique in the veneering methods on the zirconia cores. None of the zirconia core and veneering ceramics could attain the high bond strength values of the metal ceramic combination.
Keywords
zirconia core; shear bond strength; IPS e. max $Zirpress^{(R)}$; failure mode;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Guazzato M, Albakry M, Ringer SP, Swain MV. Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of allceramic materials. Part II. Zirconia-based dental ceramics. Dent Mater, 20, 449-456, 2004.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Guess PC, Kulis A, Witkowski S, Wolkewitz M, Zhang Y, Strub JR. Shear bond strengths between different zirconia cores and veneering ceramics and their susceptibility to thermocycling. Dent Mater, 24, 1556-1567, 2008.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Hamid MA, Ariel JR, Brian DF, Harald H. Flexural and shear strength of ZrO2 and a high-noble alloy bonded to their corresponding porcelians. J Prosthet Dent, 100, 274-284, 2008.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Komine F, Tomic M, Strub JR. Influence of different adhesive resin cements on the fracture strength of aluminum oxide ceramic posterior crowns. J Prosthet Dent, 92, 359- 364, 2004.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Al-Dohan HM, Yaman P, Dennison JB, Razzoog ME, Lang BR. Shear strength of core-veneer interface in bi-layered ceramics. J Prosthet Dent, 91, 349-355, 2004.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Braga RR, Ballester RY, Daronch M. Influence of time and adhesive system on the extrusion shear strength between feldspathic porcelain and bovine dentin. Dent Mater, 16, 303-310, 2000.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Choi BK, Han JS, Yang JH, Lee JB, Kim SH. Shear bond strength of veneering porcelain to zirconia and metal core. J Adv Prosthodont, 1, 129-135, 2009.   DOI
8 Craig RG. Mechanical properties in restorative dental materials. 11th ed, New York, Mosby, 551-592, 2002.
9 DeMelo RM, Travassos AC, Neisser MP. Shear bond strengths of a ceramic system to alternative metal alloys. J prosthet Dent, 93, 64-69, 2005.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Dundar M, Ozcan M, Comlekoglu E, Gungor MA, Artunc C. Bond strengths of veneering ceramics to reinforced ceramic core materials. Int J Prosthodont, 18, 71-72, 2005.
11 Schmitz K, Schulmeyer H. Determination of the adhesion of dental metal-porcelain bonding systems. Dental Labor, 23, 1416-1420, 1975.
12 윤귀덕, 유수경, 방몽숙, 양홍서, 김현승, 박상원. 염화수 화물용액 침지법으로 제작한 유색 지르코니아와 전장도재의 전단결합강도. 대한치과보철학회지, 48(2), 151-159. 2010.
13 Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Effect of zirconia type on its bond strength with different veneer ceramics. J Prosthodont, 17, 401-408, 2008.   DOI
14 Sundh A, Sjogren GA. A Comparison of fracture strength of yttrium-oxide-partiallystabilized zirconia ceramic crowns with varying core thickness, shapes and veneer ceramics. J Oral Rehabil 31, 682-688, 2004.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Wu J, Moser B, Jameson LM. The effect of oxidation heat treatment of porcelain bond strength in selected base metal alloys. J prosthet Dent, 66, 439-444, 1991.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Kosmac T, Oblak C, Jevnikar P, Funduk N. Marion L. The effect of surface grinding and sandblasting on flexural strength and reliability of Y-TZP zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater, 15, 426-433, 1999.   DOI   ScienceOn