Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/rde.2018.43.e27

Light transmittance of CAD/CAM ceramics with different shades and thicknesses and microhardness of the underlying light-cured resin cement  

Jafari, Zahra (Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Faculty, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences)
Alaghehmand, Homayoon (Dental Materials Research Center, Institute of Health, Babol University of Medical Sciences)
Samani, Yasaman (Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Faculty, Semnan University of Medical Sciences)
Mahdian, Mina (Department of Prosthodontics and Digital Technology, Stony Brook University School of Dental Medicine)
Khafri, Soraya (Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Babol University of Medical Sciences)
Publication Information
Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics / v.43, no.3, 2018 , pp. 27.1-27.9 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effects of the thickness and shade of 3 types of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) materials. Materials and Methods: A total of 120 specimens of 2 shades (A1 and A3) and 2 thicknesses (1 and 2 mm) were fabricated using VITA Mark II (VM; VITA Zahnfabrik), IPS e.max CAD (IE; IvoclarVivadent), and VITA Suprinity (VS; VITA Zahnfabrik) (n = 10 per subgroup). The amount of light transmission through the ceramic specimens was measured by a radiometer (Optilux, Kerr). Light-cured resin cement samples (Choice 2, Bisco) were fabricated in a Teflon mold and activated through the various ceramics with different shades and thicknesses using an LED unit (Bluephase, IvoclarVivadent). In the control group, the resin cement sample was directly light-cured without any ceramic. Vickers microhardness indentations were made on the resin surfaces (KoopaPazhoohesh) after 24 hours of dark storage in a $37^{\circ}C$ incubator. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance followed by the Tukey post hoc test (${\alpha}=0.05$). Results: Ceramic thickness and shade had significant effects on light transmission and the microhardness of all specimens (p < 0.05). The mean values of light transmittance and microhardness of the resin cement in the VM group were significantly higher than those observed in the IE and VS groups. The lowest microhardness was observed in the VS group, due to the lowest level of light transmission (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Greater thickness and darker shades of the 3 types of CAD/CAM ceramics significantly decreased the microhardness of the underlying resin cement.
Keywords
Ceramics; Curing lights, dental; Hardness; Resin cements;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Ozturk E, Hickel R, Bolay S, Ilie N. Micromechanical properties of veneer luting resins after curing through ceramics. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16:139-146.   DOI
2 Pazin MC, Moraes RR, Goncalves LS, Borges GA, Sinhoreti MA, Correr-Sobrinho L. Effects of ceramic thickness and curing unit on light transmission through leucite-reinforced material and polymerization of dual-cured luting agent. J Oral Sci 2008;50:131-136.   DOI
3 Shen C. Dental waxes. In: Anusavice KJ, editor. Phillips' science of dental materials. 11th ed. St. Louis (MO): Saunders; 2003. Chapter 11; 832p.
4 Janda R, Roulet JF, Kaminsky M, Steffin G, Latta M. Color stability of resin matrix restorative materials as a function of the method of light activation. Eur J Oral Sci 2004;112:280-285.   DOI
5 Goldberg M. In vitro and in vivo studies on the toxicity of dental resin components: a review. Clin Oral Investig 2008;12:1-8.
6 Peixoto RT, Paulinelli VM, Sander HH, Lanza MD, Cury LA, Poletto LT. Light transmission through porcelain. Dent Mater 2007;23:1363-1368.   DOI
7 Tarle Z, Knezevic A, Demoli N, Meniga A, Sutaloa J, Unterbrink G, Ristic M, Pichler G. Comparison of composite curing parameters: effects of light source and curing mode on conversion, temperature rise and polymerization shrinkage. Oper Dent 2006;31:219-226.   DOI
8 Janda R, Roulet JF, Latta M, Kaminsky M, Ruttermann S. Effect of exponential polymerization on color stability of resin-based filling materials. Dent Mater 2007;23:696-704.   DOI
9 Rasetto FH, Driscoll CF, Prestipino V, Masri R, von Fraunhofer JA. Light transmission through all-ceramic dental materials: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:441-446.   DOI
10 Kesrak P, Leevailoj C. Surface hardness of resin cement polymerized under different ceramic materials. Int J Dent 2012;2012:317509.
11 Della Bona A, Nogueira AD, Pecho OE. Optical properties of CAD-CAM ceramic systems. J Dent 2014;42:1202-1209.   DOI
12 Borges GA, Agarwal P, Miranzi BA, Platt JA, Valentino TA, dos Santos PH. Influence of different ceramics on resin cement Knoop hardness number. Oper Dent 2008;33:622-628.   DOI
13 Lawn BR, Pajares A, Zhang Y, Deng Y, Polack MA, Lloyd IK, Rekow ED, Thompson VP. Materials design in the performance of all-ceramic crowns. Biomaterials 2004;25:2885-2892.   DOI
14 Ozturk E, Bolay S, Hickel R, Ilie N. Effects of ceramic shade and thickness on the micro-mechanical properties of a light-cured resin cement in different shades. Acta Odontol Scand 2015;73:503-507.   DOI
15 Wang L, D'Alpino PH, Lopes LG, Pereira JC. Mechanical properties of dental restorative materials: relative contribution of laboratory tests. J Appl Oral Sci 2003;11:162-167.   DOI
16 Ilie N, Hickel R. Correlation between ceramics translucency and polymerization efficiency through ceramics. Dent Mater 2008;24:908-914.   DOI
17 Ozturk E, Bolay S, Hickel R, Ilie N. Influence of ceramic thickness and type on micromechanical properties of light-cured adhesive bonding agents. Acta Odontol Scand 2014;72:543-548.   DOI
18 Awad D, Stawarczyk B, Liebermann A, Ilie N. Translucency of esthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM materials and composite resins with respect to thickness and surface roughness. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113:534-540.   DOI
19 Al Ben Ali A, Kang K, Finkelman MD, Zandparsa R, Hirayama H. The effect of variations in translucency and background on color differences in CAD/CAM lithium disilicate glass ceramics. J Prosthodont 2014;23:213-220.   DOI
20 Sakaguchi RL, Powers JM. Restorative materials-ceramics. In: Craig's restorative dental materials. 13th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Mosby Elsevier; 2012. Chapter 11; p253-275.
21 van Noort R. Introduction to dental materials. 4th ed. St. Louis (MO): Mosby Elsevier; 2013. p231-246.
22 Barghi N, McAlister EH. LED and halogen lights: effect of ceramic thickness and shade on curing luting resin. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2003;24:497-504.
23 Stawarczyk B, Sener B, Trottmann A, Roos M, Ozcan M, Hammerle CH. Discoloration of manually fabricated resins and industrially fabricated CAD/CAM blocks versus glass-ceramic: effect of storage media, duration, and subsequent polishing. Dent Mater J 2012;31:377-383.   DOI
24 Stawarczyk B, Awad D, Ilie N. Blue-light transmittance of esthetic monolithic CAD/CAM materials with respect to their composition, thickness, and curing conditions. Oper Dent 2016;41:531-540.   DOI
25 Alt V, Hannig M, Wostmann B, Balkenhol M. Fracture strength of temporary fixed partial dentures: CAD/CAM versus directly fabricated restorations. Dent Mater 2011;27:339-347.   DOI
26 Goncu Basaran E, Ayna E, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Load-bearing capacity of handmade and computer-aided design--computer-aided manufacturing-fabricated three-unit fixed dental prostheses of particulate filler composite. Acta Odontol Scand 2011;69:144-150.   DOI
27 Miyazaki T, Nakamura T, Matsumura H, Ban S, Kobayashi T. Current status of zirconia restoration. J Prosthodont Res 2013;57:236-261.   DOI
28 Edelhoff D, Beuer F, Schweiger J, Brix O, Stimmelmayr M, Guth JF. CAD/CAM-generated high-density polymer restorations for the pretreatment of complex cases: a case report. Quintessence Int 2012;43:457-467.
29 Li RW, Chow TW, Matinlinna JP. Ceramic dental biomaterials and CAD/CAM technology: state of the art. J Prosthodont Res 2014;58:208-216.   DOI
30 Liu PR, Essig ME. Panorama of dental CAD/CAM restorative systems. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2008;29:482-488.
31 Holand W, Schweiger M, Rheinberger VM, Kappert H. Bioceramics and their applications for dental restoration. Adv Appl Ceramics 2009;108:373-380.   DOI
32 Zimmer S, Gohlich O, Ruttermann S, Lang H, Raab WH, Barthel CR. Long-term survival of Cerec restorations: a 10-year study. Oper Dent 2008;33:484-487.   DOI
33 Kelly JR, Benetti P. Ceramic materials in dentistry: historical evolution and current practice. Aust Dent J 2011;56(Supplement 1):84-96.   DOI
34 Giordano R. Materials for chairside CAD/CAM-produced restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137(Supplement):14S-21S.
35 Sjogren G, Molin M, van Dijken JW. A 10-year prospective evaluation of CAD/CAM-manufactured (Cerec) ceramic inlays cemented with a chemically cured or dual-cured resin composite. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:241-246.
36 Culp L, McLaren EA. Lithium disilicate: the restorative material of multiple options. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2010;31:716-725.
37 Tysowsky GW. The science behind lithium disilicate: a metal-free alternative. Dent Today 2009;28:112-113.
38 Kilinc E, Antonson SA, Hardigan PC, Kesercioglu A. The effect of ceramic restoration shade and thickness on the polymerization of light- and dual-cure resin cements. Oper Dent 2011;36:661-669.   DOI
39 Dirxen C, Blunck U, Preissner S. Clinical performance of a new biomimetic double network material. Open Dent J 2013;7:118-122.   DOI
40 Yoshida K, Atsuta M. Post-irradiation hardening of dual-cured and light-cured resin cements through machinable ceramics. Am J Dent 2006;19:303-307.