1 |
Hotta M, Aono M. Adaptation to the cavity floor of the light-cured glass ionomer cement base under a composite restoration. J Oral Rehabil 1994;21:679-685.
|
2 |
Oliveira LC, Duarte S Jr, Araujo CA, Abrahao A. Effect of low-elastic modulus liner and base as stress-absorbing layer in composite resin restorations. Dent Mater 2010; 26:e159-169.
DOI
|
3 |
Nomoto R, Komoriyama M, McCabe JF, Hirano S. Effect of mixing method on the porosity of encapsulated glass ionomer cement. Dent Mater 2004;20:972-978.
DOI
|
4 |
Retief DH, Mandras RS, Russell CM. Shear bond strength required to prevent microleakage of the dentin/restoration interface. Am J Dent 1994;7:44-46.
|
5 |
Erickson RL, Glasspoole EA. Bonding to tooth structure: a comparison of glass-ionomer and composite-resin systems. J Esthet Dent 1994;6:227-244.
DOI
|
6 |
Nery S, McCabe JF, Wassell RW. A comparative study of three dental adhesives. J Dent 1995;23:55-61.
DOI
|
7 |
Tjan AH, Castelnuovo J, Liu P. Bond strength of multistep and simplified-step systems. Am J Dent 1996;9:269-272.
|
8 |
Triolo PT Jr, Swift EJ Jr, Barkmeier WW. Shear bond strengths of composite to dentin using six dental adhesive systems. Oper Dent 1995;20:46-50.
|
9 |
van der Vyver PJ, de Wet FA. Shear bond strength of four dentine bonding systems to dry and moist dentine. J Dent Assoc S Afr 1997;52:555-558.
|
10 |
Eliades G, Palaghias G. In vitro characterization of visible light-cured glass ionomer liners. Dent Mater 1993;9:198-203.
DOI
|
11 |
Cattani-Lorente MA, Dupuis V, Moya F, Payan J, Meyer JM. Comparative study of the physical properties of a polyacid-modified composite resin and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Dent Mater 1999;15:21-32.
DOI
|
12 |
Chen X, Cuijpers V, Fan M, Frencken JE. Optimal use of silver nitrate and marginal leakage at the sealantenamel interface using micro-CT. Am J Dent 2009;22:269-272.
|
13 |
van Dijken JW. A 6-year clinical evaluation of Class I poly-acid modified resin composite/resin composite laminate restorations cured with a two-step curing technique. Dent Mater 2003;19:423-428.
DOI
|
14 |
Retief DH. Do adhesives prevent microleakage? Int Dent J 1994;44:19-26.
|
15 |
Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller KA, Mortazavi F. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations. Oper Dent 1997;22:21-29.
|
16 |
Tolidis K, Nobecourt A, Randall RC. Effect of a resin-modified glass ionomer liner on volumetric polymerization shrinkage of various composites. Dent Mater 1998;14:417-423.
DOI
|
17 |
Krejci I, Lutz F, Krejci D. The influence of different base materials on marginal adaptation and wear of conventional Class II composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int 1988;19:191-198.
|
18 |
Unemori M, Matsuya Y, Akashi A, Goto Y, Akamine A. Composite resin restoration and postoperative sensitivity: clinical follow-up in an undergraduate program. J Dent 2001;29:7-13.
DOI
|
19 |
Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Roeters JM, Loomans BA. Longevity and reasons for failure of sandwich and totaletch posterior composite resin restorations. J Adhes Dent 2007;9:469-475.
|
20 |
Kwon OH, Kim DH, Park SH. The influence of elastic modulus of base material on the marginal adaptation of direct composite restoration. Oper Dent 2010;35:441-447.
DOI
|
21 |
Hayashi M, Wilson NH. Marginal deterioration as a predictor of failure of a posterior composite. Eur J Oral Sci 2003;111:155-162.
DOI
|
22 |
Souza-Junior EJ, de Souza-Regis MR, Alonso RC, de Freitas AP, Sinhoreti MA, Cunha LG. Effect of the curing method and composite volume on marginal and internal adaptation of composite restoratives. Oper Dent 2011;36:231-238.
DOI
|
23 |
Carvalho RM, Pereira JC, Yoshiyama M, Pashley DH. A review of polymerization contraction: the influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent 1996;21:17-24.
|
24 |
Tay FR, Pashley DH. Water treeing-a potential mechanism for degradation of dentin adhesives. Am J Dent 2003;16:6-12.
|
25 |
Ratih DN, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Minimizing dentinal fluid flow associated with gap formation. J Dent Res 2006;85:1027-1031.
DOI
|
26 |
Ishibashi K, Ozawa N, Tagami J, Sumi Y. Swept-source optical coherence tomography as a new tool to evaluate defects of resin-based composite restorations. J Dent 2011;39:543-548.
DOI
|
27 |
Banomyong D, Palamara JE, Messer HH, Burrow MF. Sealing ability of occlusal resin composite restoration using four restorative procedures. Eur J Oral Sci 2008;116:571-578.
DOI
|
28 |
Ciucchi B, Bouillaguet S, Delaloye M, Holz J. Volume of the internal gap formed under composite restorations in vitro. J Dent 1997;25:305-312.
DOI
|
29 |
Peliz MI, Duarte S Jr, Dinelli W. Scanning electron microscope analysis of internal adaptation of materials used for pulp protection under composite resin restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 2005;17:118-128.
DOI
|
30 |
Sun J, Eidelman N, Lin-Gibson S. 3D mapping of polymerization shrinkage using X-ray micro-computed tomography to predict microleakage. Dent Mater 2009;25:314-320.
DOI
|
31 |
Zeiger DN, Sun J, Schumacher GE, Lin-Gibson S. Evaluation of dental composite shrinkage and leakage in extracted teeth using X-ray microcomputed tomography. Dent Mater 2009;25:1213-1220.
DOI
|
32 |
Kakaboura A, Rahiotis C, Watts D, Silikas N, Eliades G. 3D-marginal adaptation versus setting shrinkage in light-cured microhybrid resin composites. Dent Mater 2007;23:272-278.
DOI
|
33 |
Eden E, Topaloglu-Ak A, Cuijpers V, Frencken JE. Micro- CT for measuring marginal leakage of Class II resin composite restorations in primary molars prepared in vivo. Am J Dent 2008;21:393-397.
|
34 |
Peters OA, Laib A, Rüegsegger P, Barbakow F. Threedimensional analysis of root canal geometry by highresolution computed tomography. J Dent Res 2000;79:1405-1409.
DOI
|
35 |
Feilzer AJ, Kakaboura AI, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. The influence of water sorption on the development of setting shrinkage stress in traditional and resinmodified glass ionomer cements. Dent Mater 1995;11:186-190.
DOI
|
36 |
Tam LE, McComb D, Pulver F. Physical properties of proprietary light-cured lining materials. Oper Dent 1991;16:210-217.
|
37 |
Tam LE, Pulver E, McComb D, Smith DC. Physical properties of calcium hydroxide and glass-ionomer base and lining materials. Dent Mater 1989;5:145-149.
DOI
|
38 |
Young AM. FTIR investigation of polymerisation and polyacid neutralisation kinetics in resin-modified glassionomer dental cements. Biomaterials 2002;23:3289- 3295.
DOI
|
39 |
Mason PN, Ferrari M. In vivo evaluation of glass-ionomer cement adhesion to dentin. Quintessence Int 1994;25: 499-504.
|
40 |
Akpata ES, Sadiq W. Post-operative sensitivity in glass-ionomer versus adhesive resin-lined posterior composites. Am J Dent 2001;14:34-38.
|
41 |
Burrow MF, Banomyong D, Harnirattisai C, Messer HH. Effect of glass-ionomer cement lining on postoperative sensitivity in occlusal cavities restored with resin composite-a randomized clinical trial. Oper Dent 2009;34:648-655.
DOI
|
42 |
Unemori M, Matsuya Y, Akashi A, Goto Y, Akamine A. Composite resin restoration and postoperative sensitivity: clinical follow-up in an undergraduate program. J Dent 2001;29:7-13.
DOI
|
43 |
Heintze SD. Systematic reviews: I. The correlation between laboratory tests on marginal quality and bond strength. II. The correlation between marginal quality and clinical outcome. J Adhes Dent 2007;9(Supplement 1):77-106.
|
44 |
Heintze S, Forjanic M, Cavalleri A. Microleakage of Class II restorations with different tracers-comparison with SEM quantitative analysis. J Adhes Dent 2008;10:259-267.
|