1 |
Weine FS, Kelly RF, Lio PJ. The effect of preparation procedures on original canal shape and on apical foramen shape. J Endod 1975;1:255-262.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Sabal CL, Roane JB, Southard LZ. Instrumentation of curved canals using a modofied tipped instrument: a comparison study. J Endod 1988;14:59-64.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971;32:271-275.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
4 |
Leeb J. Canal orifice enlargement as related to biomechanical preparation. J Endod 1983;9:463-470.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
Contreras MAL, Zinman EH, Kaplan SK. Comparison of the first file that fits at the apex, before and after early flaring. J Endod 2001;27:113-116.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Tan BT, Messer H. The effect of instrument type and preflaring on apical file size determination. Int Endod J 2002;35:752-758.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Thompson SA, Dummer PM. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals, part 1. Int Endod J 2000;33:248-254.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Johnson BW. Endodontics: what, when, and why. In: Wei S editor. Contemporary endodontics Dentsply Asia, Hong Kong; 2002.p.1-6.
|
9 |
Hal kel Y, Serfaty R, Bateman G, Senger B, Allemann C. Dynamic and cyclic fatigue of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instrument. J Endod 1999; 25:434-440.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Kyomen SM, Caputo AA, White SN. Critical analysis of the balanced force technique in endodontics. J Endod 1994;20:332-337.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Wildey WL, Senia ES, Montgomery S. Another look at root canal instrumentation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992;74:499-507.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Gutierrez JH, Brizuela C, Villota E. Human teeth with periapical pathosis after overinstrumentation and overfilling of the root canals: a scanning electron microscopic study. Int Endod J 1999;32:40-48.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
13 |
Leslie Ann Malueg, Lisa R Wilcox, William Johnson. Examination of external apical root resorption with scanning electron microscopy. Oral Surg Oral. Med Oral Pathol 1996;82:89-93.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Seltzer S, Soltanoff W, Sinai I, Goldenberg A, Bender IB. Biologic aspects of endodontics. Part III. Periapical tissue reaction to root canal instrumentation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1968;26:534-546.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
15 |
Shimon F, Claus L, Malaekeh Z, Trope M. Evaluation of success and failure after endodontic therapy using a glass ionomer cement sealer. J Endod 1995;21:384-390.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Roane JB, Sabala CL, Duncanson MG Jr. The “balanced force”concept for instrumentation of curved canals. J Endod 1985;11:203-211.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
17 |
Smith CS, Setchell DJ, Harty FJ. Factors influencing the success of conventional root canal therapy-a fiveyear retrospective study. Int Endod J 1993;26:321-333.
DOI
|
18 |
Sung HJ. Influence of taper on the screw-in effect of nickel-titanium rotary files. MSc thesis Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea, 2006.
|
19 |
Diemer F, Calas P. Effect of Pitch Length on the Behavior of Rotary Triple Helix Root Canal Instruments. J Endod 2004;30:716-718.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
20 |
Schra der C, Peter OA. Analysis of torque and force with differently tapered rotary endodontic instruments in vitro. J Endod 2005;31:120-123.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
21 |
Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin Nor Am 1974;18:269-296.
|
22 |
Glosson CR, Hallor RH, Dove SB, del Rio CE. A comparison of root canal preparations using nickel-titanium hand, nickel-titanium engine-driven, and K-flex endodontic instruments. J Endod 1995;21:146-151.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
23 |
Short JA, Morgan LA, Baumgartner JC. A comparison of canal centering ability of four instrumentation techniques. J Endod 1997;23:503-507.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
24 |
Huh YJ, Kim SK. Change in root canal configuration using different file types and techniques. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 1997;22:291-304.
|
25 |
Sjo gren U, Hagglund B, Sundqvist G, Wing K. Factors Affecting the Long-term Result of Endodontic Treatment. J Endod 1990;16:498-504.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
26 |
Park WK, Lee HJ, Hur B. Shaping ability of nickeltitanium rotary files. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 2004;29: 44-50.
과학기술학회마을
DOI
|
27 |
Walia H, Brantley WA, Gerstein H. (1988) An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod 1988;14:346-351.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
28 |
Oh SH, Park JK, Hur B, Kim HC. Comparison of screw-in effect of three NiTi file systems used by undergraduates. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 2006;31:477-484.
과학기술학회마을
DOI
|
29 |
Yun HH, Kim SK. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;95:228-233.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
30 |
Ha JH, Jin MU, Kim YK, Kim SK. Comparison of screw-in effect for several nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canal. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 2010;35:267-272.
DOI
|
31 |
Al-Omari MA, Dummer PM, Newcombe RG, Doller R. Comparison of six files to prepare simulated root canals. Part 2. Int Endod J 1992;25:67-81.
DOI
|
32 |
Pettiette MT, Olutayo Delano E, Trope M. Evaluation of success rate of endodontic treatment performed by students with stainless-steel K-files and Nickel-Titanium hand files. J Endod 2001;27:124-127.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
33 |
Nagy CD, Bartha K, Bernath M, Verdes E, Szabo J. The effect of root canal morphology on canal shape following instrumentation using different techniques. Int Endod J 1997;30:133-140.
DOI
|
34 |
Esposito PT, Cunningham CJ. A comparison of canal preparation with nickel-titanium and stainless steel instruments. J Endod 1995;21:173-176.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
35 |
Peters OA, Peters CI, Schonenberger K, Barbakow F. ProTaper rotary root canal preparation: assessment of torque and force in relation to canal anatomy. Int Endod J 2003;36:93-99.
DOI
ScienceOn
|