Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2010.35.2.080

THE COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT CANAL IRRIGATION METHODS TO PREVENT REACTION PRECIPITATE BETWEEN SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE AND CHLORHEXIDINE  

Choi, Moon-Sun (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
Park, Se-Hee (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
Cho, Kyung-Mo (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
Kim, Jin-Woo (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
Publication Information
Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics / v.35, no.2, 2010 , pp. 80-87 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the different canal irrigation methods to prevent the formation of precipitate between sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and chlorhexidine (CHX). Extracted 50 human single-rooted teeth were used. The root canals were instrumented using NiTi rotary file (Profile .04/#40) with 2.5% NaOCl and 17% EDTA as irrigants. Teeth were randomly divided into four experimental groups and one control group as follows; Control group: 2.5% NaOCl only, Group 1: 2.5% NaOCl + 2% CHX, Group 2: 2.5% NaOCl + paper points + 2% CHX, Group 3: 2.5% NaOCl + preparation with one large sized-file + 2% CHX, Group 4: 2.5% NaOCl +95% alcohol+ 2% CHX. The teeth were split in bucco-lingual aspect and the specimens were observed using Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope. The percentages of remaining debris and patent dentinal tubules were determined. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Energy Dispersive x-ray Spectroscopy was used for analyzing the occluded materials in dentinal tubule for elementary analysis. There were no significant differences in percentage of remaining debris and patent tubules between all experimental groups at all levels (p > .05). In elementary analysis, the most occluded materials in dentinal tubule were dentin debris. NaOCl/CHX precipitate was detected in one tooth specimen of Group 1. In conclusion, there were no significant precipitate on root canal, but suspected material was detected on Group 1. The irrigation system used in this study could be prevent the precipitate formation.
Keywords
Chlorhexidine; Sodium hypochlorite; Para-chloroaniline; Precipitate; Canal irrigation;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Rasimick BJ, Nekich M, Hladek MM, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Interaction between chlorhexidine digluconate and EDTA. J Endod 34:1521-1523, 2008.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 O’Hoy PYZ, Messer HH, Palamara JEA. The effect of cleaning procedures on fracture properties and corrosion of NiTi files. Int Endod J 36:724-732, 2003.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Hulsmann M, Hahn W. Complications during root canal irrigation-literature review and case reports. Int Endod J 22:186-193, 2000.
4 Pashley EL, Birdsong NL, Bowman K, Pashley DH. Cytotoxic effects of NaOCl on vital tissue. J Endod 11:525-528, 1985.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Ehrich DG, Walker WA. Sodium hypochlorite accident: inadvertent injection into the maxillary sinus. J Endod 19:180-182, 1993.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Jenkins S, Addy M, Wade W. The mechanism of action of chlorhexidine : A study of plaque growth on enamel inserts in vivo. J clin perio 15:415-424, 1988.   DOI
7 Oncag O, Hosgor M, Hilmioglu S, Zekioglu O, Eronat C. Burhanoglu D. Comparison of antibacterial and toxic effects of various root canal irrigants. Int Endod J 36:423-432, 2003.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Kim HJ, Park SH, Cho KM, Kim JW. Evaluation of time-dependent antimicrobial effect of sodium duchloroisocyanurate (NaDCC) on E. faecalis in the root canal. Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 32:121-129, 2007.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Yesilsoy C, Whitaker E, Cleveland D, Phillips E, Trope M. Antimicrobial and toxic effects of established and potential root canal irrigants. J Endod 21:513-515, 1995.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Gomes-Filho JE, Aurelio KG, Costa MMTM, Bernabe PFE. Comparison of the biocompatibility of different root canal irrigants. J Appl Oral Sci 16:137-144, 2008.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Mohammadi Z, Abbott PV. The properties and applications of chlorhexidine in endodontics. Int Endod J 42:288-302, 2009.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Peters OA, Laib A, Gohring TN, Barbakow F. Changes in root canal geometry after preparation assessed by high resolution computed tomography. J Endod 27:1-6, 2001.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Bystrom A, Sundqvist G. Bacteriologic evaluation of the efficacy of mechanical root canal instrumentation in endodontic therapy. Scand J Dent Res 89:321-328, 1981.
14 Wu MK, van der Sluis LW, Wesselink PR. The capability of two hand instrumentation techniques to remove the inner layer of dentin in oval canals. Int Endod J 36:218-224, 2003.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Siqueira JF, Machado AG, Silveirab RM, Lopes HP, Uzed MD. Evaluation of the effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite used with three irrigation methods in the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis from the root canal, in vitro. Int Endod J 30:279-282, 1997.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Orstavik D, Haapasalo M. Disinfection by endodontic irrigants and dressings of experimentally infected dentinal tubules. Endod Dent Traumatol 6:142-149, 1990.   DOI
17 Park JH. The effect of solvent action of sodium hypochlorite solution on pulp tissue. Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 8:115-122, 1982.
18 Naenni N, Thoma K, Zehnder M. Soft tissue dissolution capacity of currently used and potential endodontic irrigants. J Endod 30:785-787, 2004.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Siqueira JF, Batista MMD, Fraga RC, Milton de Uzeda. Antibacterial effects of endodontic irrigants on black-pigmented gram-negative anaerobes and facultative bacteria. J Endod 24:414-416, 1998.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Turkun M, Cengiz T. The effects of sodium hypochlorite and calcium hydroxide on tissue dissolution and root canal cleanliness. Int Endod J 30:335-342, 1997.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Kakehashi S, Stanley HR, Fitzgerald RJ. The effects of surgical exposure of dental pulps in germ-free and conventional laboratory rats. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol 20:340-348, 1965.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Basrani BR, Manek S, Fillery E. Using diazotization to characterize the effect of heat or sodium hypochlorite on 2.0% chlorhexidine. J Endod 35:1296-1299, 2009.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Okazaki Y. Yamashita K, Ishii H, Sudo M, Tsuchitani M. Potential of neurotoxicity after a single oral dose of 4-Bromo-, 4-Chloro-, 4- Fluiri- or 4-Iodoaniline in Rats. J Appl Toxicol 23:315-322, 2003.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Zamany A, Safavi K, Spangberg LSW. The effect of chlorhexidine as an endodontic disinfectant. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 96:578-581, 2003.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Jeansinne MJ, White RR. A Comparison of 2.0% Chlorhexidine gluconate and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite as antimicrobial endodontic irrigants. J Endod 20:276-278, 1994.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Khademi AA, Mohammadi Z, Havaee A. Evaluation of the antibacterial substantivity of several intra-canal agents. Aust Endod J 32:112-115, 2006.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Rosenthal S, Spangberg L, Safavi KE. Chlorhexidine substantivity in root canal dentine. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 98:488-492, 2004.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Leonardo MR, Bonifacio KC. In vivo antimicrobial activity of 2% chlorhexidine used as a root canal irrigating solution. J Endod 25:167-171, 1999.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Lopez FU, Fachin EV, Camargo Fontanella VR, Barletta FB, SoMV, Grecca FS. Apical transportation: a comparative evaluation of three root canal instrumentation techniques with three different apical diameters. J Endod 34:1545-8, 2008.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Wilcox LR. Wiemann AH. Effect of a final alcohol rinse on sealer coverage of obturated root canals. J Endod 21:256-258, 1995.   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Hafner B. Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy on the SEM: A Primer. Characterization Facility, University of Minnesota, 1-26, 2006
32 Kuruvilla JR, Kamath MP. Antimicrobial activity of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate separately and combined as endodontic irrigants. J Endod 24:472-476, 1998.   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Clegg MS, Britto LR. The effect of exposure to irrigant solutions on apical dentin biofilms in vitro. J Endod 32:434-437, 2006.   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Dunavant TR, Honeyman AL. Comparative evaluation of endodontic irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms. J Endod 32:527-531, 2006.   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Zehnder M. Root canal irrigants. J Endod 32:389-398, 2006.   DOI   ScienceOn
36 Basrani B, Manek S, Sodhi RN, Fillery E, Manzur A. Interaction between sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate. J Endod 33:966-969, 2007.   DOI   ScienceOn
37 Bui TB, Baumgartner JC, Mitchell JC. Evaluation of the interaction between Sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate and its effect on root dentin. J Endod 34:181-185, 2008.   DOI   ScienceOn
38 Vivacqua-Gomes N, Ferraz CC, Gomes BP, Zaia AA, Teixeira FB. Influence of irrigants on the coronal microleakage of laterally condensed gutta-percha root fillings. Int Endod J 35:791-795, 2002.   DOI   ScienceOn
39 Marchesan MA, Pasternak B Jr, Freitas Afonso MM, Sousa-Neto MD, Paschoalato C. Chemical analysis of the flocculate formed by the association of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 103:e103-e105, 2007.   DOI   ScienceOn
40 Shin JS, Cho YB. Removal patterns of smear layer according to application temperature and time of EDTA. Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 27:535-542, 2002.   DOI   ScienceOn