Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2010.35.2.125

EFFECT OF THE EXPONENTIAL CURING OF COMPOSITE RESIN ON THE MICROTENSILE DENTIN BOND STRENGTH OF ADHESIVES  

Seong, So-Rae (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Seo, Duck-kyu (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Lee, In-Bog (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Son, Ho-Hyun (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Cho, Byeong-Hoon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics / v.35, no.2, 2010 , pp. 125-133 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objectives: Rapid polymerization of overlying composite resin causes high polymerization shrinkage stress at the adhesive layer. In order to alleviate the shrinkage stress, increasing the light intensity over the first 5 seconds was suggested as an exponential curing mode by an LED light curing unit (Elipar FreeLight2, 3M ESPE). In this study, the effectiveness of the exponential curing mode on reducing stress was evaluated with measuring microtensile bond strength of three adhesives after the overlying composite resin was polymerized with either continuous or exponential curing mode. Methods: Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (MP, 3M ESPE), Single Bond 2 (SB, 3M ESPE), and Adper Prompt (AP, 3M ESPE) were applied onto the flat occlusal dentin of extracted human molar. The overlying hybrid composite (Denfil, Vericom, Korea) was cured under one of two exposing modes of the curing unit. At 48h from bonding, microtensile bond strength was measured at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min. The fractured surfaces were observed under FE-SEM. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the microtensile bond strengths of each adhesive between curing methods (Two-way ANOVA, p > 0.05). The microtensile bond strengths of MP and SB were significantly higher than that of AP (p < 0.05). Mixed failures were observed in most of the fractured surfaces, and differences in the failure mode were not observed among groups. Conclusion: The exponential curing method had no beneficial effect on the microtensile dentin bond strengths of three adhesives compared to continuous curing method.
Keywords
Polymerization shrinkage; Exponential curing; Dentin adhesive; Microtensile bond strength; Failure mode;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Cho BH, Dickens SH. Effects of the acetone content of single solution dentin bonding agents on the adhesive layer thickness and the microtensile bond strength. Dent Mater 20:107-115, 2004.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Dickens SH, Cho BH. Interpretation of bond failure through convesion and residual solvent measurements and Weibull analyses of flexural and microtensile bond strengths of bonding agents. Dent Mater 21:354-364, 2005.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Scherrer SS, Denry I, Wiskott A, Belser U. Effect of water exposure on the fracture toughness and flexural strength of a dental glass. Dent Mater 17:367-371, 2001.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Price RB, Bannerman RA, Rizkalla AS, Hall GC. Effect of stepped vs. continuous light curing exposure on bond strengths to dentin. Am J Dent 13:123-128, 2000.
5 Caldwell R, Kulkarni G, Titley K. Does single versus stepped curing of composite resins affect their shear bond strength? J Can Dent Assoc 67(10):588-592, 2001.
6 Dauvillier BS, Aarnts MP, Feilzer AJ. Developments in shrinkage control of adhesive restoratives. J Esthet Dent 12(6):291-299, 2000.   DOI
7 Dennison JB, Yaman P, Seir R, Hamilton JC. Effect of variable light intensity on composite shrinkage. J Prosthet Dent 84(5):499-505, 2000.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Park JG, Cho BH, Lee IB, Kwon HC, Um CM. The effects of various light intensity on the polymerization of resin composites. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 26(1): 86-94, 2001.
9 윤용환, 박성호. 복합레진의 간헐적 광중합 방법이 변연적합도에 미치는 영향. 대한치과보존학회지 32(3): 248-259, 2007.   DOI
10 Yap AUJ, Soh MS. Curing efficacy of a new generation high-power LED lamp. Oper Dent 30(6):758-763, 2005.
11 Hofmann N, Hunecke A. Influence of curing methods and matrix type on the marginal seal of class II resinbased composite restorations in vitro. Oper Dent 31(1):97-105, 2006.   DOI
12 Koran P, Kurschner R. Effect of sequential versus continuous irradiation of a light-cured resin composite on shrinkage, viscosity, adhesion, and degree of polymerization. Am J Dent 11(1):17-22, 1998.
13 Silikas N, Eliades G, Watts DC. Light intensity effects on resin-composite degree of conversion and shrinkage strain. Dent mater 16(4):292-296, 2000.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller KA, Markl A. Marginal adaptation of Clss V restorations with and without softstart-polymerization. Oper Dent 23(1):26-32, 2000.
15 Yap AUJ, Seneviratne C. Influence of light energy density on effectiveness of composite cure, Oper Dent 26:460-466, 2001.
16 Van Meerbeek B, Willems G, Celis JP, Roos JR, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Assessment by nanoindentation of the hardness and elasticity of the resindentin bonding area. J Dent Res 72:1434-1442, 1993.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Venz S, Dickens B. Modified surface-active monomers for adhesive bonding to dentin. J Dent Res 72:582-586, 1993.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Perdigao J, Ramos J, Lambrechts P. In vitro interfacial relationship between human dentin and one-bottle dental adhesives. Dent Mater 13:218-227, 1997.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Choi KK, Condon JR, Ferracane JL. The effects of adhesive thickness on polymerization contraction stress of composite. J Dent Res 79:812-817, 2000.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Zheng L, Pereira PNR, Nakajima M, Sano H, Tagami J. Relationship between adhesive thickness and microtensile bond strength. Oper Dent 26:97-104, 2001.
21 Sakaguchi RL, Berge HX. Reduced light energy density decreases post-gel contraction while maintaining degree of conversion in composites. J Dent 26(8):695-700, 1998.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Unterbrink GL, Muessner R. Influence of light intensity on two restorative systems. J Dent 23(3):183-189, 1995.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Oberholzer G, Botha CT, Preez IC. Advances in light curing units and curing techniques : a literature review. SADJ 60(10):451-454, 2005.
24 Suh BI. Controlling and understanding the polymerization shrinkage-induced stresses in light-cured composites. Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl 20:s34-s41, 1999.
25 Price RBT, Ehrnford L, Andreou P, Felix CA. Comparison of quartz-tungsten-halogen, light-emitting diode, and plasma arc curing lights. J Adhes Dent 5:193-207, 2003.
26 Miyazaki M, Oshida Y, Moore BK, Onose H. Effect of light exposure on fracture toughness and flexural strength of light-cured composites. Dent Mater 12(6):328-332, 1996.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 임미영, 조경모, 홍찬의. 가변광도 중합에 따른 복합레진의 중합수축에 관한 연구. 대한치과보존학회지 32(1):28-36, 2007.
28 Burgess JO, Walker RS, Porche CJ, rappold AJ. Light curing-an update. Compednd Cont Educ Dent 23(10):889-906, 2002.
29 Goracci G, Casa de Martinis L, Mori G. Curing lightintensity and marginal leakage of resin composite restoration. Quintessence Int 27:355-362, 1996.
30 Bouschlicher MR, Rueggeberg FA. Effect of ramped light intensity on polymerization force and conversion in a photoactivated composite. J Esthet Dent 12:328-339, 2000.   DOI
31 Deliperi S, Bardwell DN. An alternative method to reduce polymerization shrinkage in direct posterior composite restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 133:1387-1398, 2002.   DOI
32 Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Curing contraction of composites and glass-ionomer cements. J Prosthet Dent 59:297-300, 1988.   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent 25(6):435-440, 1997.   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Davidson CL, De Gee AJ, Feilzer A. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 63(12):396-1399, 1984.
35 Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 66(11):1636-1639, 1987.   DOI   ScienceOn
36 Kempt-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. J Prosthet Dent 64:658-664, 1990.   DOI   ScienceOn
37 Chye CH, Yap AUJ, Laim YC, Soh MS. Post-gel polymerization shrinkage associated with different light curing regimens. Oper Dent 30(4):474-480, 2005.
38 Davidson CL. Resisting the curing contraction with adhesive composites. J Prosthet Dent 55(4):446-447, 1986.   DOI   ScienceOn
39 Mehl A, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH. Physical properties and gap formation of light-cured composites with and without 'softstart-polymerization'. J Dent 25(3-4):321-330, 1997.   DOI   ScienceOn
40 Uno S, Asmussen E. marginal adaptation of a restorative resin polymerized at reduced rate. Scand J Dent Res 99:440-444, 1991.