Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2010.35.1.051

POLYMERIZATION SHRINKAGE KINETICS OF SILORANE-BASED COMPOSITES  

Kwon, Young-Chul (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Lee, In-Bog (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics / v.35, no.1, 2010 , pp. 51-58 More about this Journal
Abstract
Dental composites have improved significantly in physical properties over the past few decades. However, polymerization shrinkage and stress is still the major drawback of composites, limiting its use to selected cases. Much effort has been made to make low shrinking composites to overcome this issue and silorane-based composites have recently been introduced into the market. The aim of this study was to measure the volumetric polymerization shrinkage kinetics of a silorane-based composite and compare it with conventional methacrylate-based composites in order to evaluate its effectiveness in reducing polymerization shrinkage. Five commercial methacrylate-based (Beautifil, Z100, Z250, Z350 and Gradia X) and a silorane-based (P90) composites were investigated. The volumetric change of the composites during light polymerization was detected continuously as buoyancy change in distilled water by means of Archemedes' principle, using a newly made volume shrinkage measurement instrument. The null hypothesis was that there were no differences in polymerization shrinkage, peak polymerization shrinkage rate and peak shrinkage time between the silorane-based composite and methacrylate-based composites. The results were as follows: 1. The shrinkage of silorane-based (P90) composites was the lowest (1.48%), and that of Beautifil composite was the highest (2.80%). There were also significant differences between brands among the methacrylate-based composites. 2. Peak polymerization shrinkage rate was the lowest in P90 (0.13%/s) and the highest in Z100 (0.34%/s). 3. The time to reach peak shrinkage rate of the silorane-based composite (P90) was longer (6.7 s) than those of the methacrylate-based composites (2.4-3.1 s). 4. Peak shrinkage rate showed a strong positive correlation with the product of polymerization shrinkage and the inverse of peak shrinkage time (R = 0.95).
Keywords
Silorane; Composites; Polymerization shrinkage; Peak polymerization shrinkage rate; Peak shrinkage time; Archemede' principle; Buoyancy;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 69:1240-1243, 1990.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Curing contraction of composites and glass ionomer cements. J Prosthet Dent 59:297-300, 1988.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Weinmann W, Thalacker C, Guggenberg R, Siloranes in dental composites. Dent Mater 21:68-74, 2005.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Stansbury JW, Trujillo-Lemon M, Lu H, Ding X, Lin y, Ge J. Conversion-dependent shrinkage stress and strain in dental resins and composites. Dent Mater 21:56-67, 2005.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Papadogiannis D, Kakaboura A, Palaghias G, Eliades G. Setting characteristics and cavity adaptation of lowshrinking resin composites. Dent Mater 25:1509-1516, 2009.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Miletic V, Ivanovic V, Dzeletovic B, Lezaja M. Temperature changes in Silorane-, Ormocer-, and Dimethacrylate-based composites and pulp chamber roof during light-curing. J Esthet Restor Dent 21:122-132, 2009.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Lee IB, Cho BH, Son HH, Um CM. A new method to measure the polymerization shrinkage kinetics of light cured composites. J of Oral Rehabil 32: 304-314, 2005.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Ellakwa A, Cho NK, Lee IB. The effect of resin matrix composition on the polymerization shrinkage and rheological properties of experimental dental composites. Dent Mater 23:1229-1235, 2007.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 이인복, 복합레진의 초기 동적 체적 중합수축의 실시간 측정-새로운 측정장치의 개발에 대한 소고-. 대한치과보존학회지 26:134-140, 2001   과학기술학회마을
10 Chappelow CC, Pinzino CS, Power MD, Eick JD. Photo cured epoxy/SOC matrix resin systems for dental composites. Polymer Reprints 38:90-91, 1997.
11 Bragg RR, Ferracane JL. Alternatives in polymerization contraction stress management. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 15(3):176-184, 2004.   DOI
12 Cadenaro M, Biasotto M, Scuor N, Breschi L, Davidson CL, Lenarda R, Assessment of polymerization contraction stress of three composite resins. Dent Mater 24:681-685, 2008.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Ferracane JL, Developing a more complete understanding of stresses produced in dental composites during polymerization. Dent Mater 21:36-42, 2005   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Peutzfeld A. Resin composites in dentistry: the monomer systems. Eur J Oral Sci 105:97-116, 1997.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent. 25:435-440, 1997.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 이인복. 복합레진 수복과 상아질 접착제의 미해결 문제점과 임상적 중요성. 대한치과보존학회지 46:424-430, 2008.   과학기술학회마을
17 Miyazaki M, Hinoura K, Onose H, Moore BK. Effects of filler content of light-cured composites on bond strength to bovine dentine. J Dent 19:301-303, 1991.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 박준규, 조병훈, 이인복, 권혁춘, 엄정분. 광조사 강도의 변화에 따른 광중합 복합레진의 중합반응에 관한연구. 대한치과보존학회지 26:86-94, 2001.   과학기술학회마을
19 Feilzer AJ, Dooren LH, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Influence of light intensity on polymerization shrinkage and integrity of restoration-cavity interface. Eur J Oral Sci 103:322-326, 1995.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Watts DC, Cash AJ. Determination of polymerization shrinkage kinetics in visible light-cured materials: methods development. Dent Mater 7:281-287, 1991.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Venhoven B.A.M., de Gee A.J. and Davidson CL. Polymerization contraction and conversion of light-curing BisGMA-based methacrylate resins. Biomater 14(1):871-875, 1993.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Sahafi A, Peutzefeld A, Asmussen E. Effect of pulsedelay curing on in vitro wall-to-wall contraction of composite in dentin cavity preparations. Am J Dent 14:295-296, 2001.
23 Segura A, Donly KJ. In vitro posterior composite polymerization recovery following hygroscopic expansion. J Oral Rehabil 20:495-9, 1993.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Park JK, JH Chang, Lee IB. How should composite be layered to reduce shrinkage stress: Incremental or bulk filling- Dent Mater 24:1501-1505, 2008.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Lee MR, Cho BH, Son HH, Um CM, Lee IB. Influence of cavity dimension and restoration methods on the cusp deflection of premolars in composite restoration. Dent Mater 23:288-295, 2007.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Obici AC, Sinhoreti MAC, de Goes MF, Consai S, Sobrinho LC. Effect of the photo-activation method on polymerization shrinkage of restorative composites. Oper Dent 27:192-198, 2002.
27 Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 66:1636-1639, 1987.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Palin WM, Fleming GJP, Nathwani H, Burke FJT, Randall RC. In vitro cuspal deflection and microleakage of maxillary premolars restored with novel lowshrink dental composites. Dent Mater 21:324-335, 2005.   DOI   ScienceOn