Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.6.477

COMPARISON OF MARGINAL MICROLEAKAGE BETWEEN LOW AND HIGH FLOWABLE RESINS IN CLASS V CAVITY  

Bae, Sang-Bae (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Cho, Young-Gon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Lee, Myeong-Seon (Department of Dental Hygiene, Seokang university)
Publication Information
Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics / v.34, no.6, 2009 , pp. 477-483 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the microleakage of low and high viscosity flowable resins in class V cavities applied with 1-step adhesives. Forty Class V cavities were prepared on the cervices of buccal and lingual surfaces of extracted molar teeth and divided into four groups (n=8). Cavities were restored with AQ Bond Plus /Metafil Flo $\alpha$, G-Bond/ UniFil LoFlo Plus (Low flow groups), AQ Bond Plus/Metafil Flo and G-Bond/UniFil Flow (High flow group), respectively. Specimens were immersed in a 2% methylene blue solution for 24 hours, and bisected longitudinally. They were observed microleakages at the enamel and dentinal margins. In conclusion, the low viscosity flowable resins showed lower marginal microleakage than do the high vis cosity flowable resins in class V cavities.
Keywords
Microleakage; Low and high viscosity flowable resin; Class V cavities; 1-step adhesives; Enamel margin; Dentinal margin;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Keyf F, Yalcin F. The weight change of various lightcured restorative materials stored in water. J Contemp Dent Prac 6:1-7, 2005
2 Miguez PA, Pereira PNR, Foxton RM, Walter R, Nunes MF, Swift Jr EJ. Effect of flowable resin on bond strength and gap formation in class I restorations. Dent Mater 20:839-845, 2004   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Lee KW, Choung SJ, Han YC, Son HH, Um JM, Oh MH, Cho BH. Prospective clinical evaluation of three different bonding systems in class V resin restoration with or without mechanical retention. The J KACD 31:300-311, 2006   DOI
4 Alani AH, Toh CG. Detection of microleakage around dental resto- rations. Oper Dent 22:173-185, 1997
5 Youngson CC, Glyn Jones JC, Magogue M, Smith IS. In vitro dentinal penetration by tracers used in microleakage studies. Int Endod J 31:90-99, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Stavridakis MM, Dietschi D, Krejci I. Polymerization shrinkage of flowable resin-based restorative materials. Oper Dent 30:118-128, 2005   ScienceOn
7 Atash R, Abbeele AV. Sealing ability and bond strength of four contemporary adhesives to enamel and to dentine. Am J Pediatric Dent 4:185-190, 2005
8 Roberts HW, Charlton DG, Murchison DF. Repair of non-carious amalgam margin defects. Oper Dent 26:237-276, 2001   ScienceOn
9 Park JG, Lim BS, Lee IB. Cuspal deflection in class V cavities restored with domposite resins. The J KACD 33:83-89, 2008   DOI
10 Hwang SJ, Shin DH. Estimation of relation between technaiques of dye pentration for microleakage and SEM evaluation for marginal adaptation of the restoration. The J KACD 31:337-343, 2006   DOI
11 Ferdianakis K. Microleakage reduction from newer esthetic restorative materials in permanent molars. J Clin Pedia Dent 22:221-229, 1998   PUBMED
12 Labella R, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G. Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent Mater 15: 128-137, 1999   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh B, Carbalho R, Miller M. Single-step, self-etch adhesives behave as permeable membranes after poly-erization. Part I. Bond strength and morphologic evidence. Am J Dent 17:271-278, 2004
14 Olmez A, Oztas N, Bodur H. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations. Oper Dent 29:713-719, 2004   PUBMED
15 Pardi V, Sinhoreti MAC, Pereira AC, Ambrosano GMB, Meneghim MC. In vitro evaluation of microleakage of different materials used as pit-and-fissure sealants. Braz Dent J 17:49-52, 2006   DOI
16 Miyazaki M, Iwasaki K, Onose H, Moore BK. Enamel and dentin bond strengths of single application bonding systems. Am J Dent 14:361-366, 2001   ScienceOn
17 Irie M, Hatanaka K, Suzuki K, Watts DC: Immediate versus water-storage performance of class V flowable composite restoratives. Dent Mater 22:875-883, 2006   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Ahn HR, Kim HC, Hur B, Park JK. The effectr of restorative materials on the stress distribution of class V composite resin restoration- a 3D finite elenment investigation. The J KACD 31:20-29, 2006   DOI
19 Celik C, Ozgunaltay G, Attar N. Clinical evaluation of flowable resins in non-carious cervical lesions: Twoyear results. Oper Dent 32:313-321, 2007   DOI
20 Takamizawa T, Yamamoto A, Inoue N, Tsujimoto A, Oto T, Irokawa K, Miyazaki M. Influence of light intensity on contraction stress of flowable resins. J Oral Science 50:37-43, 2008   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Attar N, Korkmaz. Effect of two light-emitting diode(LED) and one halogen curing light on the marginal leakage of class V flowable composite restorations. J Contemp Dent Prac 8:1-10, 2007