Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.3.184

PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF DIFFERENT SELF-ADHESIVE RESIN CEMENTS AND THEIR SHEAR BOND STRENGTH ON LITHIUM DISILICATE CERAMIC AND DENTIN  

Shin, Hye-Jin (Department of Dentistry, Collage of Medicine, Ajou University)
Song, Chang-Kyu (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Collage of Dentistry, Kangnung National University)
Partk, Se-Hee (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Collage of Dentistry, Kangnung National University)
Kim, Jin-Woo (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Collage of Dentistry, Kangnung National University)
Cho, Kyung-Mo (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Collage of Dentistry, Kangnung National University)
Publication Information
Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics / v.34, no.3, 2009 , pp. 184-191 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the physical properties of different self-adhesive resin cements and their shear bond strength on dentin and lithium disilicate ceramic and compare these result with that of conventional resin cement. For this study, four self-adhesive resin cements (Rely-X Unicem, Embrace Wetbond, Mexcem, BisCem), one conventional resin cement (Rely-X ARC) and one restorative resin composite (Z-350) were used. In order to evaluate the physical properties, compressive strength, diametral tensile strength and flexural strength were measured. To evaluate the shear bond strength on dentin, each cement was adhered to buccal dentinal surface of extracted human lower molars. Dentin bonding agent was applied after acid etching for groups of Rely-X ARC and Z-350. In order to evaluate the shear bond strength on ceramic, lithium disilicate glass ceramic (IPS Empress 2) disks were prepared. Only Rely-X ARC and Z-350 groups were pretreated with hydrofluoric acid and silane. And then each resin cement was adhered to ceramic surface in 2 mm diameter. Physical properties and shear bond strengths were measured using a universal testing machine. Results were as follows 1. BisCem showed the lowest compressive strength, diametral tensile strength and flexural strength. (P<0.05) 2. Self-adhesive resin cements showed significantly lower shear bond strength on the dentin and lithium disilicate ceramic than Rely-X ARC and Z-350 (P<0.05) In conclusion, self-adhesive resin cements represent the lower physical properties and shear bond strength than a conventional resin cement.
Keywords
Self-adhesive resin cement; physical properties of resin cement; shear bond strength;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Technical data sheet: Rely X Unicem, 3M ESPE, St Paul. USA; 2007
2 Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Itthagarun A. Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent 30(3):371-82, 2002   DOI
3 Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Influence of UEDMA BisGMA and TEGDMA on selected mechanical properties of experimental resin composites. Dent Mater 14(1):51-6, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Kumbuloglu O, Lassila LV, User A, Toksavul S, Vallittu PK. Shear bond strength of composite resin cements to lithium disilicate ceramics. J Oral Rehabil 32(2):128-33, 2005   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Escribano N, de la Macorra JC. Microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive luting cements to ceramic. J Adhes Dent 8(5):337-41, 2006   PUBMED
6 오선경, 허복, 김현철. 법랑질에 대한 total-etching과 selfetching 접착제의 산부식 효과와 미세인장결합강도. 대한치과보존학회지 29:273-280, 2004
7 Dietschi D, Maeder M, Meyer JM, Holz J. In vitro resistance to fracture of porcelain inlays bonded to tooth. Quintessence Int 21(10):823-31, 1990   PUBMED
8 Ozcan M, Vallittu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater 19(8):725-31, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Knobloch LA, Gailey D, Azer S, Johnston WM, Clelland N, Kerby RE. Bond strengths of one- and two-step self-etch adhesive systems. J Prosthet Dent 97(4):216-22, 2007   DOI   ScienceOn
10 조민우, 박상혁, 김종률, 최경규. 레진시멘트의 접착 내구성에관한 연구. 대한치과보존학회지 32:343-355, 2007
11 Reis A, Loguercio AD, Carvalho RM, Grande RH. Durability of resin dentin interfaces: effects of surface moisture and adhesive solvent component. Dent Mater 20(7):669-76, 2004   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 89(3):268-74, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Fabianelli A, Goracci C, Bertelli E, Monticelli F, Grandini S, Ferrari M. In vitro evaluation of wall-towall adaptation of a self-adhesive resin cement used for luting gold and ceramic inlays. J Adhes Dent 7(1):33-40, 2005   PUBMED
14 Saygili G, Sahmali S. Effect of ceramic surface treatment on the shear bond strengths of two resin luting agents to all-ceramic materials. J Oral Rehabil 30(7):758-64, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Thurmond JW, Barkmeier WW, Wilwerding TM. Effect of porcelain surface treatments on bond strengths of composite resin bonded to porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 72(4):355-9, 1994   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Wood M, Kern M, Thompson VP, Romberg E. Ten-year clinical and microscopic evaluation of resin-bonded restorations. Quintessence Int 27(12):803-7, 1996   PUBMED
17 Nakabayashi N. Dentinal bonding mechanisms. Quintessence Int 22(2):73-4, 1991   PUBMED
18 Nuray A, Laura E. Tam, Dorothy M. Mechanical and physical properties of contemporary dental luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 89(2):127-34. 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Chung KH, Greener EH. Correlation between degree of conversion, filler concentration and mechanical properties of posterior composite resins. J Oral Rehabil 17(5):487-94, 1990   DOI   PUBMED
20 Mak YF, Lai SC, Cheung GS, Chan AW, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Micro-tensile bond testing of resin cements to dentin and an indirect resin composite. Dent Mater 18(8):609-21, 2002   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Pereira PN, Okuda M, Sano H, Yoshikawa T, Burrow MF, Tagami J. Effect of intrinsic wetness and regional difference on dentin bond strength. Dent Mater 15(1):46-53, 1999   DOI   ScienceOn