Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.2.087

A SURVEY ON THE USE OF COMPOSITE RESIN IN CLASS II RESTORATION IN KOREA  

Shin, Dong-Ho (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Park, Se-Eun (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Yang, In-Seok (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Chang, Ju-Hea (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Lee, In-Bog (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Cho, Byeong-Hoon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Son, Ho-Hyun (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics / v.34, no.2, 2009 , pp. 87-94 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess the current materials, methods and difficulties according to the year of licence and educational background of Korean dentists in Class II direct composite resin restorations. Total 17 questions were included in the questionnaire. Questions were broadly divided into two parts: first. operator's information. and second. the materials and methods used in Class II posterior composite restoration. The questionnaire was sent to dentists enrolled in Korean Dental Association via e-mail. Total 12,193 e-mails were distributed to dentists. 2,612 e-mails were opened, and 840 mails (32.2%) were received from respondents. The data was statically analyzed by chi-square test using SPSS(v. 12.0.1, SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA). Male dentists among respondents was 79%. 60.3% of the respondents acquired their licences recently (1998-2007), and 77% practiced in private offices. 83.4% have acquired their knowledge through school lectures, conferences and seminars. For the Class II restorations, gold inlays were preferred by 65.7% of respondents, while direct composite resin restorations were used by 12.1 % amalgam users were only 4.4% of respondents. For the restorative technique, 74.4% of respondents didn't use rubber dam as needed. For the matrix. mylar strip (53.4%), metal matrix (33.8%) and Palodent system (6.5%) were used. 99.6% of respondents restored the Class II cavity by incremental layering. Obtaining of the tight interproximal contact was considered as the most difficult procedure (57.2%) followed by field isolation (21 %). Among various bonding systems, 22.6% of respondents preferred SE Bond and 20.2% used Single Bond. Z-250 was used most frequently among a variety of composite resins.
Keywords
Korean dentist; E-mail survey; Class II cavity restoration; Composite resin; Adhesive dentistry;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Burke FJT , McHugh S , Hall AC, Randall RC , Widstrom E, Forss H. Amalgam and composite use in UK general dental practice in 2001. Br Dent J 194(11) :613-618, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Sano H. Kanemura N, Burrow MF. Inai N, Yamada T, Tagami J. Effect of operator variability on dentin adhesion: students vs. dentists. Dent Mater J 17:51-58, 1998   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
3 Lynth CD, McConnell RJ. Wilson NHF. Teaching the placement of posterior resin-based composite restorations in U.S. dental schools. J Am Dent Assoc 137: 619-625. 2006   DOI
4 Brennan DS, Spencer AJ. Restorative service patterns in Australia: amalgam , composite resin and glass ionomer restorations. lnt Dent J 53(6) :455-463, 2003   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
5 Forss H, Widstrom E. From amalgam to composite selection of restorative materials and restoration longevity in Finland. Acta Odontol Scand 59(2):57-62, 2001   DOI
6 조영곤, 김문홍, 이명구. 복합레진 수복물의 미세누출 감소를 위한 레진 전색제의 효과, 대한치과보존학회지 31(4) :282-289. 2006   과학기술학회마을   DOI
7 Munck JD , Landuyt KV, Peumans M. Meerbeek BV. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue : Methods and results. J Dent Res 84(2): 118-132. 2005   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Ghavamnasiri M, Moosavi H. Effect of centripetal and incremental methods in Class II composite resin restorations on gingival microleakage. J Contemp Dent Pract 8(2): 113-120, 2007   PUBMED
9 Rabe P, Holmen A, Sjogren P. Attitudes , awareness and ·perceptions on evidence based dentistry and scien. tific publications among dental professionals in the country of Holland, Sweden. Swed Dent J 31:113-120. 2007   PUBMED
10 Burke FJT, McHugh S , Randall RC, Meyers IA, Pitt J. Hall AC' Direct restorative materials use in Australia in 2002. Aust Dent J 49(4): 185-191. 2004   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Fusayma T. Total etch technique and cavity isolation. J Esthet Dent 4: 105-109, 1992   DOI   PUBMED
12 Idriss S, Abduljabbar T, Habib C, Omar R. Factors associated with microleakage in Class II resin compos ite restorations. Oper Dent 32(1) :60-66. 2007   DOI   ScienceOn
13 박준규, 임범순, 이인복. 5급 와동의 복합레진 수복 시 발생되는 교두 굴곡에 관한 연구. 대한치과보존학회지 33(2) :83-89, 2008
14 Manhart J , Garcia-Godov F , Hickel R. Direct posterior restorations: clinical results and new developments. Dent Clin North Am 46(2): 303-339, 2002   DOI   ScienceOn
15 구봉주, 신동훈. 법랑질 변연으로 이루어진 복합레진 수복물의 체적과 C-factor가 미세누출에 미치는 영향 대한치과보존학회지 31(6) :452-459, 2006   과학기술학회마을   DOI
16 Haj-ali RN, Walker MP, Williams K. Survey of general dentists regarding posterior restorations , selection cri teria , and associated clinical problems. General Dent 369-375, 2005
17 Mccomb D. Class I and Class II silver amalgam and resin composite posterior restorations: teaching approaches in Canadian faculties of dentistry. J Can Dent Assoc 71(6) :405-406 , 2005
18 Haj-ali RN, Walker MP, Petrie CS. Utilizat ion of Evidence-based informational resources for clinical decisions related to posterior composite restorations. J Dent Edu 69(11): 1251-1256, 2005   PUBMED
19 Ortengren U. On composite resin materials. Degradation , erosion and possible adverse effects in dentists. Swed Dent J Suppl. (141): 1-61, 2000   PUBMED
20 Yoshida Y, Meerbeek BV. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 83(6) :454-458, 2004   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Shirai K, Munck JD , Yoshida Y, Meerbeek BV. Effect of cavity configuration and aging on the bonding effec tiveness of six adhesives to dentin Dent Mater 21: 110-124. 2005   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Peumans M. Kanumilli P , Munck JD , Meerbeek BV Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives ‘ A systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater 21:864-881. 2005   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Munck JD , Meerbeek BV. One-day bonding effective ness of new self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Oper Dent 30:39-49, 2005   PUBMED
24 Peutzfeldt A, Vigild M. A survey of the use of dentin bonding systems in Denmark. Dent Mater (17) :211-216. 2001   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Domejean-Orliaguet S, Tubert-Jeannin S, Riordan PJ , Espelid I, Tveit AB. French dentists' restorative treat. ment decisions. Oral Health Prey Dent 2(2): 125-131, 2004
26 Melchart D, Vogt S, Kohler W. Treatment of health complaints attributed to amalgam. J Dent Res 87(4):349-353, 2008   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
27 Wilson NHF , Christensen GJ , Cheung SW, Burke FJT, Brunton PA. Contemporary dental practice in the UK aspects of direct restorations , endodontics and bleaching. Br Dent J 197(12) :753-756, 2004   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 16:1240-1243. 1982
29 Deliperi S, Bardwell DN. An alternative method to reduce polymerization shrinkage in direct posterior composite restorations. J Am Dent Assac 133 (10): 1387-1398. 2002   DOI
30 Wahl MJ. A resin alternative for posterior teeth: ques tions and answers on dental amalgam. Dent Update 30(5): 256-262 , 2003   DOI   PUBMED
31 Raskin A, Setcos JC. Vreven J. Influence of isolation method on the 10-year clinical behaviour of posterior resin composite restorations. Clin Oral lnves 25:148-152. 2000
32 Fontana M, Gonzalez-Cabezas C. Secondary caries and restoration replacement: an unresolved problem. Compend Contin Educ Dent 21(1) :15-18, 21-24, 26, 2000   PUBMED