Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2008.33.5.472

THE INFLUENCE OF CAVITY CONFIGURATION ON THE MICROTENSILE BOND STRENGTH BETWEEN COMPOSITE RESIN AND DENTIN  

Kim, Ye-Mi (Department of Conservative Dentistry, The Graduate School, Yonsei University)
Park, Jeong-Won (Department of Conservative Dentistry, The Graduate School, Yonsei University)
Lee, Chan-Young (Department of Conservative Dentistry, The Graduate School, Yonsei University)
Song, Yoon-Jung (Department of Conservative Dentistry, The Graduate School, Yonsei University)
Seo, Deok-Kyu (Department of Conservative Dentistry, The Graduate School, Yonsei University)
Roh, Byoung-Duck (Department of Conservative Dentistry, The Graduate School, Yonsei University)
Publication Information
Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics / v.33, no.5, 2008 , pp. 472-480 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was conducted to evaluate the influence of the C-factor on the bond strength of a 6th generation self-etching system by measuring the microtensile bond strength of four types of restorations classified by different C-factors with an identical depth of dentin. Eighty human molars were divided into four experimental groups, each of which had a C-factor of 0.25, 2, 3 or 4. Each group was then further divided into four subgroups based on the adhesive and composite resin used. The adhesives used for this study were AQ Bond Plus (Sun Medical, Japan) and XenoIII (DENTSPLY, Germany). And composite resins used were fantasists (Sun Medical, Japan) and Ceram-X mono (DENTSPLY, Germany). The results were then analyzed using one-way ANOVA, a Tukey's test, and a Pearson's correlation test and were as follows. 1. There was no significant difference among C-factor groups with the exception of groups of Xeno III and Ceram-X mono (p<0.05). 2. There was no significant difference between any of the adhesives and composite resins in groups with C-factor 0.25, 2 and 4. 3. There was no correlation between the change in C-factor and microtensile bond strength in the Fantasista groups. It was concluded that the C-factor of cavities does not have a significant effect on the microtensile bond strength of the restorations when cavities of the same depth of dentin are restored using composite resin in conjunction with the 6th generation self-etching system.
Keywords
C-factor; 6th generation dentin bonding agent; Microtensile bond strength; Contraction stress;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Davidson CL, de Gee AJ. Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites. J Dent Res 63:146-8, 1984   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
2 Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength - Evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test. Dent Mater 10:236-40, 1994   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Frankenberger R, Perdigao J, Rosa BT, Lopes M. 'Nobottle' vs 'multi-bottle' dentin adhesives: a microtensile bond strength and morphological study. Dent Mater 17:373-80, 2001   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Suzuki T, Finger WJ. Dentin adhesives: site of dentin vs. bonding of composite resins. Dent Mater 4:379-83, 1988   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Prati C, Pashley DH. Dentin wetness, permeability and thickness and bond strength of adhesive systems. Am J Dent 5:33-8, 1992   PUBMED
6 Kishikawa R, Koiwa A, Chikawa H, Cho E, Inai N, Tagami J. Effect of cavity form on adhesion to cavity floor. Am J Dent 18:311-4, 2005   PUBMED
7 Davidson CL. Resisting the curing contraction with adhesive composites. J Prosthet Dent 55:446-7, 1986   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH. Do dental composites always shrink toward the light? J Dent Res. 77:1435-45, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Perinka L, Sano H, Hosoda H. Dentin thickness, hardness and Ca-concentration vs. bond strength of dentin adhesives. Dent Mater 8:229-33, 1992   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Burrow MF, Takakura H, Nakajima M, Inai N, Tagami J, Takatsu T. The influence of age and depth of dentin on bonding. Dent Mater 10:241-6, 1994   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 66:1636-9, 1987   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
12 Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stresses in composites for two different curing modes. Dent Mater 9:2-5, 1993   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Wattanawongpitak N, Yoshikawa T, Burrow MF, Tagami J. The effect of bonding system and composite type on adaptation of different C-factor restorations. Dent Mater 25:45-50, 2006   DOI
14 Mallmann A, Soares FZM, Placido E, Ferrari M, Cardoso PEC. Microtensile dentin bond strength of self-etching and single-bottle adhesive systems in different cavity configurations. J Adhes Dent 5:121-7, 2003   PUBMED
15 He Z, Shimada Y, Tagami J. The effect of cavity size and incremental technique on micro-tensile bond strength of resin composite in Class I cavities. Dent Mater 23:533-38, 2007   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The effect of dentine location and tubule orientation on the bond strengths between resin and dentine. J Dent 27:265- 74, 1999   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Choi KK, Ferracane JL, Ryu GJ, Choi SM, Lee MJ, Park SJ. Effects of cavity configuration on composite restoration. Oper Dent 29:462-9, 2004   PUBMED
18 Alster D, Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Polymerization contraction stress in thin resin composite layers as a function of layer thickness. Dent Mater 13:146-50, 1997   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Ruttermann S, Kruger S, Raab WH, Janda R. Polymerization shrinkage and hygroscopic expansion of contemporary posterior resin-based filling materials - a comparative study. J Dent 35:806-13, 2007   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Uno S, Tanka T, Inoue S. The influence of configuration factors on cavity adaptation in compomer restoration. Dent Mater 18:19-31, 1999   DOI   ScienceOn
21 김보경. 와동의 형태가 상아질과 복합레진 사이의 결합력에 미 치는 영향. 석사 학위 논문, 연세대학교 대학원, 서울, 2007
22 Nakajima M, Kanemura N, Pereira PN, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Comparative microtensile bond strength and SEM analysis of bonding to wet and dry dentin. Am J Dent 13:324-8, 2000   PUBMED
23 Shirai K, Munck JD, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Lambrechts P, Suzuki K, Shintani H, Meerbeek BV. Effect of cavity configuration and agind on the bonding effectiveness of six adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater 21:110-124, 2005   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Tagami J, Tao L, Pashley DH. Correlation among dentin depth, permeability and bond strength of adhesive resins, Dent Mater 6:45-50, 1990   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Inoue T, Takahashi H, Nishimura F. Anisotropy of tensile strengths of bovine dentin regarding dentinal tubule orientation and location. Dent Mater 21:32-43, 2002   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Yoshikawa T, Sano H, Burrow MF, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Effects of dentin depth and cavity configuration on bond strength. J Dent Res 78:898-905, 1999   DOI   ScienceOn