Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2008.33.5.457

COMPARISON OF THE RESIDUAL STRESS OF THE NANOFILLED COMPOSITES  

Park, Jeong-Won (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Yongdong Severance Hospital)
Publication Information
Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics / v.33, no.5, 2008 , pp. 457-462 More about this Journal
Abstract
"Residual stress" can be developed during polymerization of the dental composite and it can be remained after this process was completed. The total amount of the force which applied to the composite restoration can be calculated by the sum of external and internal force. For the complete understanding of the restoration failure behavior. these two factors should be considered. In this experiment. I compared the residual stress of the recently developed nanofilled dental composite by ring slitting methods. The composites used in this study can be categorized in two groups. one is microhybrid type-Z250, as control group, and nanofilled type-Grandio, Filtek Supreme. Ceram-X, as experimental ones. Composite ring was made and marked two reference points on the surface. Then measure the change of the distance between these two points before and after ring slitting. From the distance change, average circumferential residual stress $({\sigma}{\theta})$ was calculated. In 10 minutes and 1 hour measurement groups, Filtek Supreme showed higher residual stress than Z250 and Ceram-X. In 24 hour group, Filtek showed higher stress than the other groups. Following the result of this experiment, nanofilled composite showed similar or higher residual stress than Z250, and when comparing the Z250 and Filtek Supreme, which have quite similar matrix components. Filtek Supreme groups showed higher residual stress.
Keywords
Residual stress; Dental composite; Nanofilled composite; Ring slitting method;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH. Distribution of transient properties during polymerization of a lightinitiated restorative composite. Dent Mater 20:543- 553, 2004   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Taskonak B, Mecholsky Jr JJ, Anusavice KJ. Residual stresses in bilayer dental ceramics. Biomaterials 26:3235-3241, 2005   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Ferracane JL. Developing a more complete understanding of stresses produced in dental composites during polymerization. Dent Mater 21:36-42, 2005   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Lu J. Introduction, In: Handbook of measurement of residual stress. Lu J editor. Lilburn, GA: The Fairmont press Inc. pp. 1-4, 1996
5 Seif MA, Short SR. Determination of residual stresses in thin-walled composite cylinders. Exp Techniques 26:43-46, 2002
6 Seif MA, Kishawy HA, Hassan MA. Residual stresses in plastic pipes by laser speckle technique. J Test Eval 25:465-470, 1997   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Alkhiary YM, Morgano SM, Giordano RA. Effect of acid hydrolysis and mechanical polishing on surface residual stresses of low-fusing dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 90:133-142, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Kemp-Scholte CK, Davidson CL. Complete marginal seal of class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 69:1240-1243, 1990   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
9 Park JW, Ferracane JL. Residual stress in composites with the thin-ring-slitting approach. J Dent Res 85:945-949, 2006   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Uno S, Asmussen E. Marginal adaptation of a restorative resin polymerized at reduced rate. Scand J Dent Res 99:440-444, 1991   PUBMED
11 Condon JR, Ferracane JL. Reduction of composite contraction stress through non-bonded microfiller particles. Dent Mater 14:256-260, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Ferracane JL, Mitchem JC. Relationship between composite contraction stress and leakage in Class V cavities. Am J Dent 16:239-243, 2003   PUBMED
13 Yoshikawa T, Burrow MF, Tagami J. The effects of bonding system and light curing method on reducing stress of different C-factor cavities. J Adhes Dent 3:177-183, 2001   PUBMED
14 Davidson CL, de Gee AJ, Feilzer AJ. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 63:1396- 1399, 1984   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
15 Witzer MF, Calheiros FC, Goncalves F, Kawano Y, Braga RR. Influence of photoactivation method on conversion, mechanical properties, degradation in ethanol and contraction stress of resin-based materials. J Dent 33:773-779, 2005   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Choi KK, Ryu GJ, Choi SM, Lee MJ, Park SJ, Ferracane JL. Effects of cavity configuration on composite restoration. Oper Dent 29:462-469, 2004   PUBMED
17 Whittle AJ, Burford RP, Hoffman MJ. Influence of Residual Stress on the Relationship Between Pipe Pressure and C-Ring Tests. Polym Eng Sci 40:2311- 2316, 2000   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Eick JD, Welch FH. Polymerization shrinkage of posterior composite resins and its possible influence on postoperative sensitivity. Quintessence Int 17:103-111, 1986   PUBMED
19 Braga RR, Hilton TJ, Ferracane JL. Contraction stress of flowable composite materials and their efficacy as stress-relieving layers. J Am Dent Assoc 134:721-728, 2003   DOI
20 Kim KH, Ong JL, Okuno O. The effect of filler loading and morphology on the mechanical properties of contemporary composites. J Prosthet Dent 87:642-649, 2002   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Pintado MR, DeLong R, Douglas WH. Residual shrinkage stress distributions in molars after composite restoration. Dent Mater 20:554-564, 2004   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Park JW, Ferracane JL. Measuring the residual stress in dental composites using a ring slitting method. Dent Mater 21:882-889, 2005   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Toschi F, Melandri C, Pinasco P, Roncari E, Guicciardi S, de Portu G. Influence of residual stresses on the wear behavior of alumina/alumina-zirconia laminated composites. J Am Ceram Soc 86:1547-1553, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn