Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2008.33.2.125

The effect of different bonding systems on shear bond strength of repaired composite resin  

Seon, Eun-Mi (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Kim, Hyeon-Cheol (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Hur, Bock (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Park, Jeong-Kil (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Publication Information
Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics / v.33, no.2, 2008 , pp. 125-132 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to compare the shear bond strength of repaired composite resin with different bonding agents and evaluate the effect of bonding agents on composite repair strength. Forty composite specimens (Z-250) were prepared and aged for 1 week by thermo cycling between 5 and $55^{\circ}C$ with a dwell time of 30s. After air abrasion with $50\;{\mu}m$ aluminum oxide, following different bonding agents were applied (n = 10); SB group: Scotchbond multipurpose adhesive (3 step Total-Etch system); XE group: Clearfil SE bond (2 step Self-Etch system); XP group: XP bond (2 step Total-Etch system); XE group: Xeno III (1 step Self-Etch system). After bonding procedure was completed, new composite resin (Z-250) was applied to the mold and cured. For control group. 10 specimens were prepared. Seven days after repair, shear bond strength was measured. Data was statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (p<0.05). The means and standard deviations of shear bond strength (MPa ${\pm}$ S.D.) per group were as follows: SB group: 17.06; SE group: 19.10; XP group: 14.44; XE group: 13.57; Control Group: 19.40. No significant difference found in each group. Within the limit of this study, it was concluded that the different type of bonding system was not affect on the shear bond strength of repaired composite resin.
Keywords
Composite repair; Aluminum oxide sandblasting; Bonding system; Shear bond strength;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Gordan VV, Shen C, Riley J 3rd, Mjor IA. Two-year clinical evaluation of repair versus replacement of composite restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 18:144-154. 2006   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Moon JW, Lee KW, Park SJ. The effect of surface treatments on the shear bond strength of repaired composites. J Korean Academy of Conserv Dent 24:156-162, 1999
3 Ozcan M, Barbosa SH, Melo RM, Galhano GA, Bottino MA. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of resin composite to composite after aging conditions. Dent Mater 23:1276-1282, 2006   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Tezvergil A, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Composite-composite repair bond strength: effect of different adhesion primers. J Dent 31:521-525, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Teixeira EC, Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Ritter AV, Swift EJ. Shear Bond Strength of Self-etching bonding systems in combination with various composites used for repairing aged composites. J Adhes Dent 7:159- 164, 2005   PUBMED
6 Papacchini F, Dall' Oca S, Chieffi N, Goracci C, Sadek FT, Suh BI, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Composite-to-composite Microtensile Bond Strength in the Repair of a Microfilled Hybrid Resin: Effect of surface treatment and oxygen inhibition. J Adhes Dent 9:25-31, 2007
7 Soderholm KJ, Roberts MJ. Variables influencing the repair strength of dental composites. Scand J Dent Res 99:173-180, 1991   PUBMED
8 Lucena-Martin C, Gonzalez-Lopez S, Navajas-Rodri guez de Mondelo JM. The effect of various surface treatments and bonding agents on the repaired strength of heat-treated composites. J Prosthet Dent 86:481-488, 2001   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Papacchini F, Magni E, Radovic I, Mazzitelli C, Monticellia F, Goracci C, Polimeni A, Ferrari M. Effect of intermediate agents and pre-heating of repairing resin on composite-repair bonds. Oper Dent 32:363- 371, 2007   DOI
10 Bonstein T, Garlapo D, Donarummo J Jr, Bush PJ. Evaluation of varied repair protocols applied to aged composite resin. J Adhes Dent 7:41-49, 2005   PUBMED
11 Her SB, Lim BS, Kim CW. Effect of surface treatment and thermocycling on the shear bond strength of repaired posterior hybrid composite resins. J Kor Res Dent Mat 24:247-256, 1997
12 Shahdad SA, Kennedy JG. Bond Strength of repaired anterior composite resins: an in vitro study. J Dent 2:685-694, 1998
13 Boyer DB, Chan KC, Reinhardt JW. Build-up and repair of light-cured composites. J Dent Res 63:1241- 1244, 1984   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
14 Sau CW, Oh GS, Koh H, Chee CS, Lim CC. Shear bond strength of repaired composite resins using a hybrid composite resin. Oper Dent 24:156-161, 1999   PUBMED
15 Cavalcanti AN, De Lima AF, Peris AR, Mitsui FH, Marchi GM. Effect of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 19:90-99, 2007   DOI
16 Hagge MS, Lindemuth JS, Jones AG. Shear bond strength of bis-acryl composite provisional material repaired with flowable composite. J Esthet Restor Dent 14:47-52, 2002   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Hannig C, Laubach S, Hahn P, Attin T. Shear bond strength of repaired adhesive filling materials using different repair procedures. J Adhes Dent 8:35-40, 2006   PUBMED
18 Brosh T, Pilo R, Bichacho N, Blutstein R. Effect of combinations of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. J Prosthet Dent 77:122-126, 1997   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Lim HN, Chol HY. A Study on the optimal surface treatment of composite resin restorations for the bonding of resinous materials. J Kor Res Dent Mat 24:91- 108, 1997