Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2008.33.1.001

SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF EXPERIMENTAL COMPOSITE RESINS USING CONFOCAL LASER SCANNING MICROSCOPE  

Bae, J.H. (Department of Conservation Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital)
Lee, M.A. (Department of Conservation Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Cho, B.H. (Department of Conservation Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics / v.33, no.1, 2008 , pp. 1-8 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a new resin monomer, filler size and polishing technique on the surface roughness of composite resin restorations using confocal laser scanning microscopy. By adding new methoxylated Bis-GMA (Bis-M-GMA, 2,2-bis[4-(2-methoxy-3-methacryloyloxy propoxy) phenyl] propane) having low viscosity, the content of TEGDMA might be decreased. Three experimental composite resins were made: EX1 (Bis-M-GMA/TEGDMA = 95/5 wt%, 40 nm nanofillers); EX2 (Bis-M-GMA/TEGDMA = 95/5 wt%, 20 nm nanofillers); EX3 (Bis-GMA/TEGDMA = 70/30 wt%, 40 nm nanofillers). Filtek Z250 was used as a reference. Nine specimens (6 mm in diameter and 2 mm in thickness) for each experimental composite resin and Filtek Z250 were fabricated in a teflon mold and assigned to three groups. In Mylar strip group, specimens were left undisturbed. In Sof-lex group, specimens were ground with #1000 SiC paper and polished with Sof-lex discs. In DiaPolisher group, specimens were ground with #1000 SiC paper and polished with DiaPolisher polishing points. The Ra (Average roughness), Rq (Root mean square roughness), Rv (Valley roughness), Rp (Peak roughness), Rc (2D roughness) and Sc (3D roughness) values were determined using confocal laser scanning microscopy. The data were statistically analyzed by Two-way ANOVA and Tukey multiple comparisons test (p = 0.05). The type of composite resin and polishing technique significantly affected the surface roughness of the composite resin restorations (p < 0.001). EX3 showed the smoothest surface compared to the other composite resins (p < 0.05). Mylar strip resulted in smoother surface than other polishing techniques (p < 0.05). Bis-M-GMA. a new resin monomer having low viscosity, might reduce the amount of diluent, but showed adverse effect on the surface roughness of composite resin restorations.
Keywords
Bis-M-GMA; confocal laser scanning microscopy; filler size; new resin monomer; surface roughness;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Hachiya Y, Iwaku M, Hosoda H, Fusayama T. Relation of finish to discoloration of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 53:811-814, 1984
2 Lu H, Roeder LB, Powers JM. Effect of polishing systems on the surface roughness of microhybrid composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 15:297-304, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Toledano M, De La Torre FJ, Osorio R. Evaluation of two polishing methods for resin composites. Am J Dent 1994;7:328-330
4 Bouvier D, Duprez JP, Lissac M. Comparative evaluation of polishing systems on the surface of three aesthetic materials. J Oral Rehabil 24:888-894, 1997   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Turssi CP, Saad JRC, Duarte SLL, Rodirigues AL. Composite surfaces after finishing and polishing techniques. Am J Dent 13:136-138, 2000   PUBMED
6 Kim JW, Kim LU, Kim CK, Cho BH, Kim OY. Characteristics of novel dental composites containing 2,2-bis[4-(2-methoxy-3-methacryloxy-propoxy) phenyl] propane as a base resin. Biomacromolecules 7:154-160, 2006   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Gonza′lez-Cabezas C, Fontana M, Dunipace AJ, Li Y, Fischer GM, Proskin HM, Stookey GK. Measurement of enamel remineralization using microradiography and confocal microscopy. A correlational study. Caries Res 32:385-392, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Al-Shammery HA, Bubb NL, Youngson CC, Fasbinder DJ, Wood DJ. The use of confocal microscopy to assess surface roughness of two milled CAD-CAM ceramics following two polishing techniques. Dent Mater 23:736-741, 2007   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Ross M, Romrell LJ, Kaye GI. Histology. A test and atlas. 3rd Ed., p12-13, Williams & Wikins, 1995
10 Braden M. The formulation of composite filling materials. Oper Dent 3:97-102, 1978   PUBMED
11 von Noort R, Davis LG. The surface finish of composite resin restorative materials. Br Dent J 10:360-364, 1984
12 Okazaki M, Douglas WH. Comparison of surface layer properties of composite resin by ESCA, SEM and X-ray diffractiometry. Biomaterials 5:284-290, 1984   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Rong MZ, Zhang MQ, Pan SL, Friedrich K. Interfacial effects in polypropylene-silica nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci 92:1771-1781, 2004   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Lee JY, Shin DH. Surface roughness of universal composites after polishing procedures. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 28:369-377, 2003   DOI
15 Anseth KS, Newman SM, Bowman CN. Polymeric dental composites: properties and reaction behavior of multimethacrylate dental restorations. Adv Polym Sci 122:177-217, 1995
16 Fruits TJ, Miranda FJ, Coury TL. Effects of equivalent abrasive grit sizes utilizing differing polishing motions on selected restorative materials. Quintessence Int 27:279-285, 1996   PUBMED
17 Bae JH, Kim YK, Yoon PY, Lee MA, Cho BH. Effect of a new resin monomer on the microleakage of composite resin restorations. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 32:468-474, 2007   과학기술학회마을   DOI
18 Banerjee A, Boyde A. Autofluorescence and mineral content of carious dentine: scanning optical and backscattered electron microscopic studies. Caries Res 32:219-26, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Kalachandra S, Sankarapandian M, Shobha HK, Taylor DF, McGrath JE. Influence of hydrogen bonding on properties of Bis-GMA analogs. J Mater Sci Mater Med 8:283-286, 1997   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Mohan B, Kandaswamy D. A confocal microscopic evaluation of resin-dentin interface using adhesive systems with three different solvents bonded to dry and moist dentin in vitro study. Quintessence Int 36:511-521, 2005   PUBMED
21 Marigo L, Rizzi M, La Torre G, Rumi G. 3-D surface profile analysis: different finishing methods for resin composites. Oper Dent 26:562-568, 2001   PUBMED
22 Al-Nawas B, Grotz KA, Gotz H, Heinrich G, Rippin TG, Stender TE, Duschner H, Wagner W. Validation of three-dimensional surface characterising methods: scanning electron microscopy and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Scanning 23:227-231, 2001   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
23 Roede LB, Tate WH, Powers JM. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of packable composites. Oper Dent 25:534-543, 2000   PUBMED
24 Terry DA. Direct applications of a nanocomposite resin system; part 1- the evolution of contemporary composite materials. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 16:417-422, 2004   PUBMED
25 Chan KC, Fuller JL, Hormati AA. The ability of foods to stain two composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 43:542- 545, 1980   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Lee IB, Lee JH, Cho BH, Son HH, Lee ST, Um CM. Rheological properties of resin composites according to the change of monomer and filler compositions. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 29:520-531, 2004   DOI
27 Kaplan BA, Goldstein GR, Vijayaraghvan TV, Nelson IK. The effect of three polishing systems on the surface roughness of four hybrid composites; a profilometric and scanning electron microscopy study. J Prosthet Dent 76:34-38, 1996   DOI   ScienceOn