Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2007.32.5.469

EFFECT OF A NEW RESIN MONOMER ON THE MICROLEAKAGE OF COMPOSITE RESIN RESTORATIONS  

Bae, J.H. (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital)
Kim, Y.K. (Department of Oral Maxilofacial Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital)
Yoon, P.Y. (Department of Oral Maxilofacial Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital)
Lee, M.A. (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Cho, B.H. (Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics / v.32, no.5, 2007 , pp. 469-475 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a new resin monomer on the microleakage of composite resin restorations. By adding new methoxylated Bis-GMA (Bis-M-GMA, 2,2-bis[4-(2-methoxy-3-methacryloyloxy propoxy) phenyl] propane) having low viscosity, the content of TEGDMA which has adverse effects on polymerization shrinkage might be decreased. As a result, microleakage might be improved. $2\;mm\;{\times}\;2\;mm\;{\times}\;2\;mm$ cavities with occlusal margins in enamel and gingival margins in dentin were prepared on buccal and lingual surfaces of 40 extracted human premolars. Prepared teeth were randomly divided into four groups and restored with Clearfil SE bond (Kuraray, Japan) and one of experimental composite resins; EX1, Experimental composite resin1 (Bis-M-GMA/TEGDMA = 95/5 wt%, 40 mm nanofillers); EX2, Experimental composite resin2 (Bis-M-GMA/TEGDMA = 95/5 wt%, 20 mm nanofillers); EX3, Experimental composite resin3 (Bis-GMA/TEGDMA = 70/30 wt%, 40 nm nanofillers); and Filtek Z250 (3M ESPE, USA) was filed as a control group. The restored teeth were thermocycled, and immersed in 2% methylene blue solution for 24 hours. The teeth were sectioned buccolingually with a low speed diamond saw and evaluated for microleakage under stereomicroscope. The data were statistically analyzed by Pearson Chi-Square test and Fisher Exact test (p = 0.05). The microleakage scores seen at the enamel margin were significantly lower than those of dentin margin (p = 0.007). There were no significant differences among the composite resins in the microleakage scores within each margin (p > 0.05). Bis-M-GMA, a new resin monomer having low viscosity, might in part replace high viscous Bis-CMA and might improve the quality of composite resin.
Keywords
Microleakage; New resin monomer; Bis-M-GMA; Viscosity; Polymerization shrinkage;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Going RE. Microleakage around dental restorations: a summarizing review. J Amer Dent Asso 1972: 84: 1349-1357   DOI
2 Hanning M, Fu B. Effect of air abrasion and resin composite on microleakage of class V restoration bonded with self etching primers. J Adhes Dent 2001: 3:265-272   PUBMED
3 Davidson CL, AJ Feilzer. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restorations. J Dent 1997:25:435-440   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Stansbury JW. Synthesis and evaluation of new oxaspiro monomers for doulble ring-opening polymerization. J Dent Res 1992:71:1408-1412   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
5 Parakki A, Tallury P, Mondelli RFL. Influence of additives on the properties of Bis-GMA/Bis-GMA analog comonomers and corresponding copolymers. Dent Mater 2006 (E-pub ahead of print)
6 Dickens SH, Cho BH. Interpretation of bond failure through conversion and residual solvent measurements and Weibull analyses of flexural and microtensile bond strengths of bonding agents. Dent Mater 2005 :21: 354-364   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Kim IS, Min KS, Shin DH. Microleakage of various composite resin systems. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 2003: 28:127-133   DOI
8 Sakaguchi RL, Peters MCRB, Nelson SR, Douglas WH, Poort HW. Effects of polymerization contraction in composite restorations. J Dent 1992:20:178-182   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Bausch JR, Lange KD, Davidson CL, Peters A, de Gee AJ. Clinical significance of polymerization shrinkage of composite resins. J Prasthet Dent 1982:48:59-67   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Wieczkowski G, Joynt RB, Davis EL, Yu XY, Cleary K. Leakage patterns associated with glass-ionomer based resin restorations. Oper Dent 1992: 17 :21-25   PUBMED
11 Thompson VP, Williams EF, Bailey WJ. Dental resins with reduced shrinkage during hardening. J Dent Res 1979:58:1522-1532   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
12 Anseth KS, Newman SM, Bowman CN. Polymeric dental composites: properties and reaction behavior of multimethacrylate dental restorations. Adv Polym Sci 1995: 122: 177-217
13 Moon EJ, Lee JY, Kim CK, Cho BH. Dental restorative composi tes containing 2, 2-bis-[4- (2-hydroxy-3-methacryloyloxy propoxy) phenyl] propane derivatives and spiro orthocarbonates. J Biomed Mater Res Part B 2005:73B:338-346   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Alani AH, Toh CG. Detection of microleakage around dental restorations: a review. Oper Dent 1997 :22: 173-185   PUBMED
15 Goldman M. Polymerization shrinkage of resin-based restorative materials. Aust Dent J 1983:28:156-161   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Kim JJ, Moon HJ, Lim BS, Lee YK, Rhee SH, Yang HC. The effect of nanofiller on the opacity of experimental composites. J Biomed Meter Res Part B 2007: 80B: 332-338   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Cho BH, Dickens SH, Bae JH. Chang CG, Son HH, Urn CM. Effect of interfacial bond quality on the direction of polymerization shrinkage flow in resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2002 :27 :297-304   PUBMED
18 Kim LU, Kim JW, Kim CH. Effect of molecular structure of the resins on the volumetric shrinkage and the mechanical strength of dental restorative composites. Biomacromolecules 2006: 7: 2680-2687   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Aguiar FHB, Santos AJS, Groppo FC, Lovadino JR. Quqntititive evaluation of marginal leakage of two resin composite restorations using two filling techniques. Oper Dent 2002:27:475-479   PUBMED
20 Kalachandra S, Sankarapandian M, Shobha HK, Taylor DF, McGrath JE. Influence of hydrogen bonding on properties of Bis-GMA analogs. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1997:8:283-286   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Fayyad MA, Shortall AC. Microleakage of dentin-bonded posterior composite restoration. J Dent 1987:15:67-72   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Lee IB, Lee JH, Cho BH, Son HH, Lee ST, Urn CM. Rheological properties of resin composites according to the change of monomer and filler compositions. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 2004:29:520-531   DOI
23 Kim Y, Kim CK, Cho BH, Son HH, Um CM, Kim OY. A new resin matrix for dental composite having low volumetric shrinkage. J Biomed Meter Res Part B 2004:70B:82-90   DOI
24 Braden M. The formulation of composite filling materials. Oper Dent 1978:3:97-102   PUBMED
25 Kim JW, Kim LU, Kim CK, Cho BH, Kim OY. Characteristics of novel dental composites containing 2. 2-bis (4-(2-methoxy-3-methacryloxy-propoxy) phenyll propane as a base resin. Biomacromolecules 2006 :7: 154-160   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Barnes DM, McDonald NJ, ThomsonVP, Blank LW, Shires PJ. Microleakage in facial and lingual class 5 composite restorations: A comparision. Oper Dent 1994: 19: 133-137   PUBMED
27 Bowen RL. Adhesive bonding of various materials to hard tooth tissues. II. Bonding to dentin promoted by a surface-active comonomer. J Dent Res 1965;44:895-902   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
28 Kang SH, Kim OY, Oh MH, Cho BH, Um CM, Kwon HC, Son HH. Microleakage of microfill and flowable composite resins in class V cavity after load cycling. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 2002:27:142-149   과학기술학회마을   DOI
29 Gordon M, Plasschaert AJM, Saiku JM, Pelzner RB. Microleakage of posterior composite resin materials and an experimental urethane restorative material tested in vitro above and below the cementaoenamel junction. Quint Int 1986:17:11-15