PROSPECTIVE CLINICAL EVALUATION OF THREE DIFFERENT BONDING SYSTEMS IN CLASS V RESIN RESTORATIONS WITH OR WITHOUT MECHANICAL RETENTION |
Lee Kyung-Wook
(Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Choung Sae-Joon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) Han Young-Chul (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) Son Ho-Hyun (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) Um Chung-Moon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) Oh Myoung-Hwan (Vericom R&D Center) Cho Byeong-Hoon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) |
1 | Borcic J, Anic I, Smojver I, Catic A, Miletic I, Ribaric SP. 3D finite element model and cervical lesion formation in normal occlusion and in malocclusion. J Oral Rehabil 32:504-510. 2005 DOI ScienceOn |
2 | Gordan VV, Mjor IA, Vazquez O, Watson RE, Wilson N. Self-etching primer and resin-based restorative material: two-year clinical evaluation. J Esthet Restor Dent 14:296-302, 2002 DOI ScienceOn |
3 | Tanaka M, Naito T, Yokota M, Kohno M. Finite element analysis of the possible mechanism of cervical lesion formation by occlusal force. J Oral Rehabil 30:60-67. 2003 DOI ScienceOn |
4 | Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Kaga M, Endo K, Sano H, Oguchi H. In vivo degradation of resin-dentin bonds in humans over 1 to 3 years. J Dent Res 79: 1385-1391. 2000 DOI ScienceOn |
5 | Duke ES, Robbins JW, Snyder DS. Clinical evaluation of a dentinal adhesive system: three-year results. Quintessence Int 22:889-895, 1991 |
6 | McCoy RB, Anderson MH, Lepe X, Johnson GH. Clinical success of class V composite resin restorations without mechanical retention. J Am Dent Assoc 129:593-599, 1998 DOI |
7 | Inoue S, Vargas MA, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Sano H, Van Meerbeek B. Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to enamel. Am J Dent 16:329-334.2003 |
8 | Ryge G, Snyder M. Evaluating the clinical quality of restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 87: 369-377, 1973 DOI |
9 | Uno S, Abo T, Tanaka T, Sano H. In vitro sealing performance of two one-step adhesive systems in cervical cavities. J Adhes Dent 6:211-219, 2004 |
10 | Yoshida E, Uno S. Voids formation along the bonding interface between a smeared dentin surface and all-inone adhesives. Dent Mater J 23:643-649, 2004 DOI ScienceOn |
11 | Tay FR, Pashley DH, Garcia-Godoy F, Yiu CK. Singlestep, self-etch adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerization. Part II. Silver tracer penetration evidence. Am J Dent 17:315-322,2004 |
12 | Perdigao J, Carmo AR, Anauate-Netto C, Amore R, Lewgoy HR. Cordeiro HJ, Dutra-Correa M, Castilhos N. Clinical performance of a self-etching adhesive at 18 months. Am J Dent 18:135-140,2005 |
13 | Duke ES, Lindemuth J. Variability of clinical dentin substrates. Am J Dent 4:241-246, 1991 |
14 | Gwinnett AJ, Kanca J 3rd. Interfacial morphology of resin composite and shiny erosion lesions. Am J Dent 5:315-317,1992 |
15 | Tilliss TS, Keating JG. Understanding and managing dentin hypersensitivity. J Dent Hyg 76:296-310, 2002 |
16 | Smales RJ, Webster DA. Restoration deterioration related to later failure. Oper Dent 18: 130-137, 1993 |
17 | Levitch LC, Bader JD, Shugars DA, Heymann HO. Non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 22: 195-207, 1994 DOI ScienceOn |
18 | Smales RJ, Gerke DC. Clinical evaluation of lightcured anterior resin composites over periods of up to 4 years. Am J Dent 5:208-212. 1992 |
19 | Inoue S, Vargas MA, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P. Vanherle G, Sano H, Van Meerbeek B. Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to dentin. J Adhes Dent 3:237-245.2001 |
20 | Mjor IA, Shen C, Eliasson ST, Richter S. Placement and replacement of restorations in general dental practice in Iceland. Oper Dent 27: 117-123. 2002 |
21 | Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent 3 :45-64, 2001 |
22 | Summitt JB, Robbins JW, Schwartz RS. Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry: A Contemporary Approach. ed 2. Illinois. Quintessence Publishing, 2001. p396 |
23 | Agostini FG, Kaaden C, Powers JM. Bond strength of self-etching primers to enamel and dentin of primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 23 :481-486, 2001 |
24 | Kanemura N, Sano H. Tagami J. Tensile bond strength to and SEM evaluation of ground and intact enamel surfaces. J Dent 27:523-530, 1999 DOI ScienceOn |
25 | Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Itthagarun A. Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent 30:371-382,2002 DOI ScienceOn |
26 | Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: a review. Dent Mater 11:117-125,1995 DOI ScienceOn |
27 | Wucher M, Grobler SR. Senekal PJ. A 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a composite and a compomer/composite (sandwich) in class II restorations. Am J Dent 15:274-278, 2002 |
28 | Bader JD. Levitch LC. Shugars DA. Heymann HO. McClure F. How dentists classified and treated noncarious cervical lesions. J Am Dent Assac 124:46-54. 1993 DOI |
29 | Pashley EL, Agee KA, Pashley DH. Tay FR. Effects of one versus two applications of an unfilled, all-in-one adhesive on dentine bonding. J Dent 30:83-90, 2002 DOI ScienceOn |
30 | Browning WD. Brackett WW. Gilpatrick RO. Retention of microfilled and hybrid resin-based composite in noncarious Class 5 lesions: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Oper Dent 24:26-30, 1999 |