Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2006.31.1.058

THE COMPARISON OF RELATIVE RELIABILITY ON BIAXIAL AND THREE POINT FLEXURAL STRENGTH TESTING METHODS OF LIGHT CURING COMPOSITE RESIN  

Seo, Deog-Gyu (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Roh, Byoung-Duck (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Publication Information
Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics / v.31, no.1, 2006 , pp. 58-65 More about this Journal
Abstract
The possibility of applying a hi-axial flexure strength test on composite resin was examined using three point and hi-axial flexure strength tests to measure the strength of the light-cured resin and to compare the relative reliability using the Weibull modulus. The materials used in this study were light-curing restorative materials, $MICRONEW^{TM},\;RENEW^{(R)}$ (Bisco, Schaumburg, USA). The hi-axial flexure strength measurements used the piston-on-3-ball test according to the regulations of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 6872 and were divided into 6 groups, where the radius of the specimens were 12mm (radius connecting the 3-balls: 3.75mm), 16 mm(radius connecting the 3-balls: 5mm), and the thickness were 0.5mm, 1mm, 2mn for each radius. The hi-axial flexure strength of the $MICRONEW^{TM}\;and\;RENEW^{(R)}$ were higher than the three point flexure strength and the Weibull modulus value were also higher in all of the bi-axial flexure strength groups, indicating that the hi-axial strength test is relatively less affected by experimental error. In addition, the 2 mm thick specimens had the highest Weibull modulus values in the hi-axial flexure strength test, and the $MICRONEW^{TM}$ group showed no significant statistical difference (p>0.05). Besides the 2mm $MICRONEW^{TM}$ group, each group showed significant statistical differences (p<0.05) according to the thickness of the specimen and the radius connecting the 3-balls. The results indicate that for the 2mm group, the hi-axial flexure strength test is a more reliable testing method than the three point flexure strength test.
Keywords
Biaxial flexure strength; Three point flexure strength; Weibull modulus; Composite resin;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Zidan O, Asmussen E etc. Tensile strength of restorative resins. J Dent Res 88:285-298, 1980
2 Radford KC, Lange FF. Loading factors for the biaxial flexure test. J Am Ceram Soc 61(5-6):211-213, 1978   DOI   ScienceOn
3 박성은. Ball-on-3-ball 시험에 의한 알루미나의 이축 파괴 거동 및 피로 수명 예측 시뮬레이션, 연세대학교 대학원 박사학위논문 2000
4 Shetty DK, Roesinfield AR, Bansal GK, Duckworth WH. Biaxial fracture stuies of a glass-ceramic. J Am Ceram Soc 64(1):1-4, 1981   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Chiang MYM, Tesk JA. Differences: Hertz vs finite element calculation for diametral tensile strength. J Dent Res 68:341-348, 1989
6 Ban S, Anusavice KJ. Influence of test method on failure stress of brittle dental materials. J Dent Res 69(12):1791-1799, 1990   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Marshall DB. An improved biaxial flexure test of ceramics, Am Ceram Soc Bull 59:551-553, 1980
8 Wilshaw TR. Measurement of tensile strength of ceramics, J Am Ceram Soc 51:111-117, 1968   DOI
9 Bryant RW, Mahler DB. Modulus of elasticity in bending of composites and amalgams. J Prasthet Dent 56:243-248, 1986   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Lamon J. Statistical approaches to failure for ceramic reliability assessment, J Am Ceram Soc 71:106-112, 1988   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Ham-Su R, Wilkinson DS. Strength of tape cast and laminated ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 78(6):1580-1584, 1995   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Shetty DK, Roesinfield AR, Macguire P, Bansal GK. Duckworth WH. Biaxial flexure tests for ceramics. Am Ceram Soc Bull 59(12):1193-1197, 1980
13 한봉석. $Al_{2}O_{3}$ 세라믹스의 열충격 파괴 거동과 열응력 해석, 연세대학교 대학원 박사학위논문 1997
14 Shetty DK, Roesinfield AR, Duckworth WH, Held PR. A Biaxial-flexure test for evaluating ceramic strength. J Am Ceram Soc 66:36-42, 1983   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Williams and Lewis RM, Swank R. Use of Weibull statics to correlate MOR, Ball-on-ring, and rotational fast fracture tests. J Am Ceram Soc 66(11):756-768, 1983
16 Kao R, Perrone N, Capps W. Large-deflection solution of the coaxial-ring-circular-glass-plate flexure problem. J Am Ceram Soc 54:566-571, 1971   DOI
17 Aunsavice KJ, Hojjatie B, Stress distribution in metal ceramic crowns with a facial porcelain margin. J Dent Res 66:1493-1498, 1987   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Mckinney KR, Herbert CM. Effect of surface finish on structual ceramic failure, J Am Ceram Soc 53:513-516, 1970   DOI
19 Kirstein AF, Woolley RM. Symmetrical bending of thin circular elastic plates of equally spaced point supports. J Res Nall Burstds 71(C):1-10, 1967