1 |
Garip Y, Gunday M. The use of computed tomography when comparing nickel-titanium and stainless steel files during preparation of simulated curved canals. Int Endod J 34(6):452-457, 2001
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Yun HH, Kim SK. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 95(2):228-233, 2003
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Schafer E, Vlassis M. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. Int Endod J 37(4):229-238, 2004
DOI
ScienceOn
|
4 |
Szep S, Gerhardt T, Leitzbach C, Luder W, Heidemann D. Preparation of severely curved simulated root canals using engine-driven rotary and conventional hand instruments. Clin Oral Investig 5(1):17-25, 2001
DOI
|
5 |
Hata G, Uemma M, Kato AS, Imura N, Novo NF, Toda T. A comparison of shaping ability using ProFile, GT file, and Flex-R endodontic instruments in simulated carials. J Endod 28(4):316-321, 2002
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Kim HC, Park JK, Hur B. Relative efficacy of three Ni-Ti file systems used by undergraduates. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 30(1):38-48, 2005
DOI
|
7 |
Park WK, Lee HJ, Hur B. Shaping ability of nickel-titanium rotary files. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 29(1):44-50, 2004
DOI
|
8 |
Iqbal MK, Firic S, Tulcan J, Karabucak B, Kim S. Comparison of apical transportation between ProFile and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments. Int Endod J 37(6):359-364, 2004
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Glosson CR, Haller RH, Dove SB, Delrio CE. A comparison of root canal preparation using NiTi hand, NiTi engine driven and K-Flex endodontic instruments. J Endod 21:146-151, 1995
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Gonza 'lez-Rodr' guez MP, Ferrer-Luque CM. A comparison of Profile, Hero 642, and K3 instrumentation systems in teeth using digital imaging analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 97(1):112-115, 2004
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Berutti E, Chiandussi G, Gaviglio I, Ibba A. Comparative analysis of torsional and bending stresses in two mathematical models of nickel-titanium rotary instruments: ProTaper versus ProFile. J Endod 29(1):15-19, 2003
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Walsch H. The hybrid concept of nickel?titanium rotary instrumentation. Dent Clin North Am 48:183-202, 2004
DOI
ScienceOn
|
13 |
Calhoun G, Montgomery S. The effects of four instrumentation techniques on root canal shape. J Endod 14(6):273-277, 1988
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Griffiths IT, Bryant ST, Dummer PM. Canal shapes produced sequentially during instrumentation with Quantec LX rotary nickel-titanium instruments: a study in simulated canals. Int Endod J 33:346-354, 2000
DOI
ScienceOn
|
15 |
Bergmans L, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Beullens M, Wevers M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P. Progressive versus constant tapered shaft design using NiTi rotary instruments. Int Endod J 36(4):288-295, 2003
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Ankrum MT, Hartwell GR, Truitt JE. K3 Endo, ProTaper, and ProFile systems: breakage and distortion in severely curved roots of molars. J Endod 30(4):234-237, 2004
DOI
ScienceOn
|
17 |
Calberson FL, Deroose CA, Hommez GM, De Moor RJ. Shaping ability of ProTaper nickel-titanium files in simulated resin root canals. Int Endod J 37(9):613-623, 2004
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Schafer E, Schulz-Bongert U, Tulus G. Comparison of hand stainless steel and nickel titanium rotary instrumentation: clinical study. J Endod 30(6):432-435, 2004
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Park H. A comparison of Greater Taper files, Profiles and stainless steel files to shape curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 91(6):715-718, 2001
DOI
ScienceOn
|
20 |
Chen JL, Messer HH. A comparison of stainless steel hand and rotary nickel-titanium instrumentation using a silicone impression technique. Aust Dent J 47(1):12-20, 2002
DOI
ScienceOn
|
21 |
Clauder T, Baumann MA, ProTaper NT system. Dent Clin North Am 48(1):87-111, 2004
DOI
ScienceOn
|
22 |
Peters OA. Current Challenges and Concepts in the Preparation of Root Canal Systems: A Review. J Endod 30(8):559-567, 2004
DOI
ScienceOn
|
23 |
Walia H, Brantley WA, Gerstein H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod 14(7):346-351, 1988
DOI
ScienceOn
|
24 |
Garala M, Kuttler S, Hardigan P, Steiner-Carmi R, Dorn S. A Comparison of the minimum canal wall thickness remaining following preparation using two nickel-titanium rotary systems. Int Endod J 36:636-642, 2003
DOI
ScienceOn
|
25 |
Thompson SA, Dummer PMH. Shaping ability of Hero642 rotary nickel- titanium instruments in simulated root canals: Part 1. Int Endod J 33:248-254, 2000
DOI
ScienceOn
|
26 |
Powell SE, Simon JHS, Maze B. A comparison of the effect of modified and nonmodified instrument tips on apical canal configuration. J Endod 12:293-300, 1986
DOI
ScienceOn
|
27 |
Park SH, Cho KM, Kim JW. The Efficiency of the Ni-Ti Rotary files in Curved Simulated Canals Shaped by Novice Operators. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 28(2):146-155, 2003
과학기술학회마을
DOI
|
28 |
Schafer E. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments and stainless steel hand K-Flexofiles in simulated curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 92(2):215-220, 2001
DOI
ScienceOn
|
29 |
Peters OA, Peters CI, Barbakow F. ProTaper rotary root canal preparation: effects of canal anatomy on final shape analysed by micro CT. Int Endod J 36(1):86-92, 2003
DOI
ScienceOn
|
30 |
Kosa DA, Marshall G, Baumgartner JC. An analysis of canal centering using mechanical instrumentation techniques. J Endod 25(6):441-445, 1999
DOI
ScienceOn
|