Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2005.30.4.283

Comparative evaluation of micro-shear bond strength between two different luting methods of resin cement to dentin  

Lee, Yoon-Jeong (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Division of Dentistry, Graduate School Kyunghee University)
Park, Sang-Jin (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Division of Dentistry, Graduate School Kyunghee University)
Choi, Kyoung-Kyu (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Division of Dentistry, Graduate School Kyunghee University)
Publication Information
Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics / v.30, no.4, 2005 , pp. 283-293 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of dual bonding technique by comparing microshear bond strength between two different luting methods of resin cement to tooth dentin. Three dentin bonding systems(All-Bond 2, One-Step, Clearfil SE Bond), two temporary cements (Propac, Freegenol) were used in this study. In groups used conventional luting procedure, dentin surfaces were left untreated. In groups used dual bonding technique, three dentin bonding systems were applied to each dentin surface. All specimens were covered with each temporary cement. The temporary cements were removed and each group was treated using one of three different dentin bonding system. A resin cement was applied to the glass cylinder surface and the cylinder was bonded to the dentin surface. Then, micro-shear bond strength test was performed. For the evaluation of the morphology at the resin/dentin interface, SEM examination was also performed. 1. Conventional luting procedure showed higher micro-shear bond strengths than dual boning technique. However, there were no significant differences. 2. Freegenol showed higher micro-shear bond strengths than Propac, but there were no significant differences. 3. In groups used dual bonding technique, SE Bond showed significantly higher micro-shear bond strengths in One-Step and All-Bond 2 (p<0.05), but there was no significant difference between One-Step and All-Bond 2. 4. In SEM observation, with the use of All-Bond 2 and One-Step, very long and numerous resin tags were observed. This study suggests that there were no findings that the dual bonding technique would be better than the conventional luting procedure.
Keywords
Dual bonding technique; Resin cement; Conventional luting procedure; Micro-shear bond strength;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Milleding P, Ortengren U, Karlsson S. Ceramic inlay systems : some clinical aspects. J Oral Rehabil 22:571-580, 1995.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Watanabe I, Nakabayashi N, Pashley PH. Bonding to ground dentin by a Phenyl-P self-etching primer. J Dent Res 73:1212-1220, 1994.   DOI
3 Kaneshima T, Yatani H, Kassai T, Watanabe EK, Yamashita A. The influence of blood contamination on bond strengths between dentin and adhesive resin cement. Oper Dent 25:195-201, 2000.
4 Baier RE. Principles of adhesion. Oper Dent Supplement 5:1-9, 1992.
5 Marshall SJ, Marshall GW, Harcourt JK. The influence of various cavity bases on the micro-hardness of composites. Aust Dent J 27:291-295, 1982.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Gwinnett AJ, Kanca J. Micromorphology of the bonded dentine interface and its relationship to bond strength. Am J Dent 5:73-77, 1992.
7 Sano H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Horner JA, Matthews WG, Pashley DH. Nanoleakage: leakage within the hybrid layer. Oper Dent 20:18-25, 1995.
8 Paul SJ, Scharer P. Effect of provisional cements on the shear bond strength of various dentin bonding agents. J Oral Rehabil 24:8-14, 19.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Tay FR, Gwinnett JA, Wei SH. Micromorphological spectrum from over drying to over-wetting acid conditioned dentin in water-free acetone-based single bottle primer/adhesives. Dent Mater 12:236-244, 1996.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Tyas MJ, Anusavice KJ, Frencken JE, Mount GJ. Minimal intervention dentistry. Int Dent J 20:1-12, 2000.
11 Inokoshi S, Willems G, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G. Dual-cure luting composites : Part I : Filler particle distribution. J Oral Rehabil 20:133-146, 1993.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petschelt A. Technique sensitivity of dentin bonding : Effect of application mistakes on bond strength and marginal adaptation. Oper Dent 25:324-330, 2000.
13 Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 16:265-273, 1982.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Xie J, Powers JM, McGuckin RS. In vitro bond strength of two adhesives to enamel and dentin under normal and contaminated conditions. Dent Mater 9:295-299, 1993.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 DeGoes MF, Nikaido T, Pereira PNR, Tagami J. Early bond strengths of dual- cured resin cement to resincoated dentin. J Dent Res 79:453, 2000.
16 Sorensen JA, Munksgaard EC, Odont D. Relative gap formation adjacent to ceramic inlays with combination of resin cements and dentine bonding agents. J Prosthet Dent 76:472-476, 1996.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Christensen GJ. Resin cements and postoperative sensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc 131:1197-1199, 2000.   DOI
18 El-Mowafy OM, Bennergui C. Radiopacity of resinbased inlay luting cements. Oper Dent 19:11-15, 1994.
19 Paul SJ, Scharer P. The dual bonding technique : A modified method to improve adhesive luting procedures. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 17:537-545, 1997.
20 Soderholm K-JM. Correlation of in vivo and in vitro performance of adhesive materials : A report of the ASC MD 156 task group on test methods for adhesion of restorative materials. Dent Mater 7:74-83, 1991.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Pashley DH, Pashley EL. Dentin permeability and restorative dentistry : a status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent 4:5-9, 1991.
22 Burrow MF, Nikaido T, Satoh M, Tagami J. Early bonding of resin cements to dentin. Oper Dent 21:196-202, 1996.
23 Millstein PL, Nathanson D. Effect of eugenol and eugenol cements on cured composite resin. J Prosthet Dent 50:211-215, 1983.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Stangel I. Nathanson D, Hsu C. Shear strength of the composite bond to etched porcelain. J Dent Res 66:1460-1465, 1987.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Cox CF. Evaluation and treatment of bacterial microleakage. Am J Dent 7:293-295, 1994.
26 Fontana M, Dunipace AJ, Gregory RL, Noblitt TW, Li Y, Park KK, Stookey GK. An in vitro microbiological model for studying secondary careis formatioon. Caries Res 30:112-118, 1996.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM, Sano H. Horner JA, Brewer PD, Pashley DH. Regional bond strengths of resins to human root dentine. J Dent 24:435-442, 1996.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Swift EJ, Perdigao J, Heymann HO. Bonding to enamel and dentin : A brief history and state of the art. Quintessence Int 26:95-110, 1995.
29 Ganss C, Jung M. Effect of eugenol- containing temporary cements on bond strength of composite to dentin. Oper Dent 23:55-62, 1998.
30 Kanca J. Resin bonding to wet substrates I-bonding to dentin. Quintessence Int 23:39-41, 1992.
31 Bertschinger C, Paul SJ, Luthy H, Scharer P. Dual application of dentin bonding agents : effects on bond strengths. Am J Dent 9:115-119, 1996.
32 Powell TL, Huget EF. Effects of cements and eugenol on properties of a visible light-cured composite. Pediatr Dent 15:104-107, 1993.
33 Woody TL, Davis RD. The effect of eugenol containing and eugenol-free temporary cements on microleakage in resin bonded restorations. Oper Dent 17:175-180, 1992.
34 Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength-evaluation of a microtensile bond test. Dent Mater 10:236-240, 1994.   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Magne P, Douglas WH. Porcelain veneers : dentin bonding optimization and biomimetic recovery of the crown. Int J Prosthodont 12:111-121, 1999.
36 Terata R. Characterization of enamel and dentin surfaces after removal of temporary cement - study on removal of temporary cement. Dent Mater 12:18-28, 1993.   DOI   ScienceOn
37 Versluis A, Douglas WH, Cross M, Sakaguchi RL. Does an incremental filling technique reduce the polymerization shrinkage stress$?$J Dent Res 75:871-878, 1996.   DOI   ScienceOn
38 Christensen GJ. Resin cements and post-operative sensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc 131:1197-1199, 2000.   DOI
39 Eliades G. Clinical relevance of the formulation and testing of dentine bonding systems. J Dent 22:73-81, 1994.   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn