Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.6.520

RHEOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF RESIN COMPOSITES ACCORDING TO THE CHANGE OF MONOMER AND FILLER COMPOSITIONS  

Lee In-Bog (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Lee Jong-Hyuck (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Cho Byung-Hoon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Son Ho-Hyun (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Lee Sang-Tag (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Um Chung-Moon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics / v.29, no.6, 2004 , pp. 520-531 More about this Journal
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of monomer and filler compositions on the rheological properties related to the handling characteristics of resin composites. Methods. Resin matrices that Bis-GMA as base monomer was blended with TEGDMA as diluent at various ratio were mixed with the Barium glass (0.7 um and 1.0 um), 0.04 um fumed silica and 0.5 um round silica. All used fillers were silane treated. In order to vary the viscosity of experimental composites, the type and content of incorporated fillers were changed, Using a rheometer, a steady shear test and a dynamic oscillatory shear test were used to evaluate the viscosity ($\eta$) of resin matrix, and the storage shear modulus (G'), the loss shear modulus (G"), the loss tangent ($tan{\delta}$) and the complex viscosity (${\eta}^*$) ofthe composites as a function of frequency ${\omega}{\;}={\;}0.1-100{\;}rad/s$. To investigate the effect of temperature on the viscosity of composites, a temperature sweep test was also undertaken. Results. Resin matrices were Newtonian fluid regardless of diluent concentration and all experimental composites exhibited pseudoplastic behavior with increasing shear rate. The viscosity of composites was exponentially increased with increasing filler volume%. In the same filler volume, the smaller the fillers were used, the higher the viscosities were. The effect of filler size on the viscosity was increased with increasing filler content. Increasing filler content reduced $tan{\delta}$ by increasing the G' further than the G". The viscosity of composites was decreased exponentially with increasing temperature.
Keywords
Rheology; Resin composites; Storage shear modulus; Loss shear modulus; Complex viscosity;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ. et al. A characterization of firstgeneration flowable composites. JADA 129: 567-577, 1998
2 Opdam NJM, Roeters JJM, Peters TCRB, et al. Consistency of resin composites for posterior use. Dent Mater 12: 350-354, 1996   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Lee IB, Son HH, Um CM. Rheological Properties of flowable, conventional hybrid, and condensable composite resins. Dent Mater 19:298-307, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Al-sharaa KA, Watts DC. Stickiness prior to setting of some light cured resin composites. Dent Mater 19:182-187, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Craig RG. Restorative dental materials. 1993: Saunders co. 10th edi. 77-83
6 Barnes HA, Hutton JF , Walters K. An introduction to rheology. 1989; Elsevier Science Publishing co.
7 한국유변학회 유변학의 이론과 응용. 2001 : 1st edi. 3-103, 175-191
8 Tavas MA, Watts DC. The use of a cone and plate vis cometer for determination of flow properties of unfilled resins and etching gels. J of Oral Rehabi116: 185-192, 1989
9 Kim SW, Kim OY, Jang JS. Rheological properties of fumed silica filled Bis-GMA dispersions. Polymer Eng and Sci 38:1142-1148, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Musanje L, Ferracane JL. Effects of resin formulation and nanofiller surface treatment on the properties of experimental hybrid resin composite. Biomaterials 25:4065-4071, 2004   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Lim BS, Ferracane JL, Condon JR, Adey JD. Effect of filler fraction and filler surface treatment on wear of microfilled composites. Dent Mater 18:1-11, 2002   DOI   ScienceOn
12 문탁진. 유변학. 1988 ; 민음사 1st edi. 7-80, 190-195
13 Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braaem M, et al. A classification of dental composites according to their morphological and mechanical characteristics. Dent Mater 8:310-319, 1992   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Mohsen NM, Craig RG. Effect of silanation of fillers on their dispersability by monomer systems. J of Oral Rehab 22:183-189, 1995   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Asmussen E. Peutzfeldt A. Influence of UEDMA, BisGMA and TEGDMA on selected mechanical properties of experimental resin composites. Dent Mater 14: 51-56, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Ikejima L Nomoto R, McCabe. Shear punch strength and flexural strength of model composies with varying filler volume fraction , particle size and silanation. Dent Mater 19: 206-211, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Braden M. Viscosity and consistency of impression rubbers. J Dent Res 46(2) :429-433, 1967   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
18 Watt DC. Elastic moduli and visco-elastic relaxation. J Dent. 22:154-158, 1994   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Schulze KA, Zaman AA, Soderholm KJ. Effect of filler fraction on strength, viscosity and porosity of experimental compomer materials. J of Dent 31:373-382, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Braem M, Finger W, Doren VE, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Mechanical properties and filler fraction of dental composites. Dent Mater 5:346-349, 1989   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Silikas N, Watts DC. Rheology of urethane dimethacrylate and diluent formulations. Dent Mater 15:257-261, 1999   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Leinfelder KF. Prasad A. A new condensable composite for the restoration of posterior teeth. Dent Today 17(2):112-6, 1998   PUBMED
23 Jacobsen PH. Whiting R, Richardson PCA. Viscosity of setting anterior restorative materials. Brit dent J 143:393, 1977   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Beatty MW, Swartz ML, Moore BK, Phillips RW, Roberts TA. Effect of microfiller fraction and silane treatment on resin composite properties. J Biomed Mater Res 40:12-23, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Dulik D, Bernier R, Brauer GM. Effect of diluent monomer on the physical properties of Bis-GMA based composites. J Dent Res 60:983-989, 1981   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
26 Tyas MJ, Jones DW, Rizkalla AS. The evaluation of resin composite consistency. Dent Mater 14:424-428, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Kwon TM, Jhon MS, Choi HJ. Viscosity of magnetic particle suspension. J mole liquid 75: 115-126, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Leinfelder KF, Radz GM, Nash RW. A report on a new condensable composite resin. Compendium 19(3) :230-237, 1998
29 Ferracane JL, Moser JB, Greener EH. Rheology of composite restoratives. J Dent Res 60(9): 1678-85, 1981   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
30 McCabe JF, Bowman AJ. The rheological properties of dental impression materials. Brit dent J. 151: 179, 1981   DOI   ScienceOn
31 김상용. 고분자물리학. 1994; 서울대학교출판부 2nd edi. 7-26
32 Halvorson RH, Erickson RL, Davidson CL. The effect of filler and silane content on conversion of resin based composite. Dent Mater 19:327-333, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Goldberg AJ. Viscoelastic properties of silicon, polysulfide, and polyether impression materials. J Dent Res 53(5):1033-39, 1974   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
34 Taylor DF, Kalachandra SK, Sankarapandian M, McGrath JE. Relationship between filler and matrix resin characteristics and the properties of uncured composite pastes. Biomaterials 19: 197-204, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Soderholm KJM. Influence of silane treatment and filler fraction on thermal expansion of composite resins. Dent Res 63:1321-1326. 1984   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
36 Duran RL, Powers JM, Craig RG. Viscoelastic and dynamic properties of soft liners and tissue conditioners. J Dent Res 58(8): 1801-1807, 1979   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn