Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2003.28.4.326

A STUDY OF CONTRACTION SHRINKAGE OF COMPOSITE RESINS AND ORMOCERS WITH VARIOUS CURING TIMES  

Chung, Yeon-Chung (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentitstry, Dankook University)
Min, Kyung-San (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentitstry, Dankook University)
Lee, Hae-Hyoung (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentitstry, Dankook University)
Cho, Kyung-Mo (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentitstry, Dankook University)
Cho, Yong-Bum (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentitstry, Dankook University)
Publication Information
Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics / v.28, no.4, 2003 , pp. 326-333 More about this Journal
Abstract
Ormocer has organic-inorganic compound polymers. One of advantages of ormocer is reduced polymerization shrinkage. The purpose of this study was to compare the amount of contraction shrinkage of composite resins and ormocers. Additionally, the time of each material when there is no further change of contraction shrinkage was analysed. Four brands of composite resins (P-60. Surefil, Z-250 and Denfil) and two brands of ormocers (Definite and Admira) were used. 20 seconds, 40 seconds and 60 seconds of curing times were given. Contraction shrinkage of them were measured using a linometer for 80 seconds. The effect of material and curing time to contraction shrinkage at the time of 80 seconds was analysed by two-way ANOVA. The effect of time to contraction shrinkage was analysed by one-way ANOVA and the time when there was no further change of the contraction shrinkage was analysed. The results are as follows: 1. P-60, Definite, Z-250 and Denfil had no further change of contraction shrinkage from the time of 20 seconds, and Surefil and Admira had no further change of contraction shrinkage from the time of 10 seconds. 2. Statistical analysis revealed volumetric shrinkage varied among material (p<0,05). No significant difference of contraction shrinkage among different curing times was found, and there was no effect of interaction between materials and curing times to contraction shrinkage. 3. Definite and Admira showed the statistically same contraction shrinkage with those of Z-250 and P-60. which is higher than that of Surefil and lower than that of Denfil (p<0.05).
Keywords
Ormocer; Linometer; Definite; Admira;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Sakaguchi RL, Peters MCRB, Nelson SR, Douglas W and Poort HW Effects of polmerization contraction in composite restorations J Dent 20:178-182, 1992   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Tobolsky AV, Leonard R and Roexer GP Use of polymerizable ring compounds in constant volume polymerizations J Polm Sci 3:604-611, 1948   DOI
3 Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ and Davidson CL Curing contraction of composites and glassionomer cements J Prosthet Dent 59:297-300, 1988   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Degussa dental research technical manual of Definite Sep 1998 Unpublished paper
5 Miki IGA, Fimio T, Takashi U, Mitsuo Y and Yasushiko T The relationship between polymerization shrinkage measured by a modified dilatometer and the inorganic filler content of light-cured composites Dent Mater J 10(1):38-45, 1991   DOI
6 Dauviller B, Aarnts M and Feilzer AJ Developments in shrinkage control of adhesive restoratives J Esthet Dent 12:291-299, 2000   DOI
7 Venhoven BA, de Gee AJ, and Davidson CL Polymerization contraction and conversion of light-curing Bis-GMA based methacrylate resins Biomater 14:871-75, 1993
8 Asmussen E Composite restorative resins. Composition versus wall to wall polymerization contraction Acta Odontol Scand 33:337-44, 1975   DOI
9 Perry R, Kugel G and Leinfelder K One year clinical evaluation of Surefil packable composite Compend Contin Educ Dent Jun:20(6):544-550, 552-553, 1999
10 Freedman G Condensable composites: the new paradigm in amalgam alternatives Dent Today 17(10):72-74, 1998
11 Davidson CL, and de Gee AJ Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites J Dent Res 63:146-148, 1984   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
12 Davidson CL and Feilzer AJ Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-base restoratives J Dent 25:435-440, 1997   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Suliman AA, Boyer DB and Lakes RS Cusp movement in premolars resulting from composite polymerization shrinkage Dent Mater 9:6-12, 1993   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ and Davidson CL Increased wall to wall curing contraction in thin bonded resin layers J Dent Res 86:48-50, 1989
15 Hickma J and Jacobsen PH Finite element analysis of dental polymeric restorations Clin Mater 7:39-46, 1991   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Iga M, Takeshige F, Ui T, Torii M and Tsuchitani Y The relationship between polymerization shrinkage and the inorganic filler content of light-cured coomposites Dent Mater J 10:38-45, 1991   DOI
17 Watts DC, Cash AJ Determination of polymerization shrinkage kinetics in visible-light-cured materials: methods development Dent Mater 7:281-7 Oct. 1991   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Chen HY, Manhart J, Hickel R and Kunzelmann K-H Polymerization contraction stress in light-cured packable composite resins Dent Mater 17:253-259, 2001   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Attin T, Buchalla W, Kielbassa AM and Helwig E Curing shrinkage and volumetric changes of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials Dent Mater 11: 359-389, 1995   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Carvalho RM, Pereira JC, Yoshiyama M and Pashley DH A review of polymerization contraction The influence of stress development versus stress relief Oper Dent 21: 17-24, 1996
21 de Gee AJ, Feilzer AJ and Davidson CL True linear polymerization shrinkage of unfilled resins and composites determined with a linometer Dent Mater 9: 11-14, 1994
22 Smith DL and Schoonover IG Direct filling resins dimensional changes resulting from polymerization shrinkage and water sorption JADA 46:540-44, 1953   DOI
23 Koran P and Kurschner R Effect of sequential versus continuous irradiation of a light-cured resin composite on shrinkage, viscosity, adhesion and degree of polymerization Am J Dent 11:17-22, 1998   PUBMED
24 Dennison J, Yaman P, Seir R and Hamilton J Effect of variable light intensity on composite shrinkage Prosthet Dent 84:499-505, 2000   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Miyazaki M, Hinoura K, Onose H and Moore BK Effect of filler content of light-cured composites on bond strength to bovine dentine J Dent 19:301-3, 1991   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Bandyopadhyay S A study of the volumetric setting shrinkage of some dental materials J Biomed Mat Res 16:135-44, 1982   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
27 Park SH, Krejci I and Lutz F A comparison of microhardness of resin composites polymerized by plasma arc or conventional visible light curing Oper Dent 27:30-37, 2002
28 Hay JN and Shortall AC, Polymerization contraction and reaction kinetics of three chemically activated restorative resins J Dent 16:172-6, 1988   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Patel MP, Braden M and Davy KWM Polymerization shrinkage of methacrylate esters. Biometer 8:53-79, 1991