Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2003.28.2.127

MICROLEAKAGE OF VARIOUS COMPOSITE RESIN SYSTEMS  

Kim, In-Soo (Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentitstry, Dankook University)
Min, Kyung-San (Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Shin, Dong-Hoon (Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Publication Information
Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics / v.28, no.2, 2003 , pp. 127-133 More about this Journal
Abstract
The object of this study was to compare the microleakage between various composite resin systems of multistep, one-bottle, and self-etching systems using electrical conductivity. After making class V cavities ($4{\times}3{\times}1.5{\;}mm$ around CEJ), they were bulk filled with three kinds of resins of A3. Teeth were storaged in a saline solution for one day, after then, they were finished and polished using Sof-Lex system. Another stress of thermocycling was made for 500 times from $5^{\circ}{\;}to{\;}55^{\circ}C$ with each dwelling time of 10 seconds. Electrical conductivity (microamphere, $\mu\textrm{A}$) was checked four times: before and after cavity preparation, after filing, after thermocycling. One-way ANOVA and 95% Scheffe Post Hoc test was used for checking any statistical difference among groups. Another 95% Paired Samples T-test was also used for estimating any significant difference within group after cavity filling or thermocycling. The results were as follows: 1 Every specimen showed various range of microleakage after filing. There was, however, no difference between composite resin systems. 2. All composite resin systems showed marked increase in microleakage with a thermocycling (p<0.05), there was, however, no difference between composite resin systems. 3. Although there was no significant difference between groups (p=0.078), one-bottle and self-etching systems seemed to be unstable than multistep system. Within the limits of this study, it was concluded that much more consideration should be needed when using thermally unstable one-bottle and self-etching systems that have multi-advantages from simplified step. More studies will be needed to solve these kinds of problems.
Keywords
Microleakage; Electrical conductivity; Multistep; One-bottle; Self-etching; Microamphere;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Gordon M. Plasschaert AJM and Stark MM. Microleakage of several tooth-colored restorative materials in cervical cavities. a comparative study in vitro. Dent Mater 1986:2:228-231   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Bouillaguet S, Gysi P, Wataha JC. Ciucchi B, Cattani M, Godin C and Meyer JM. Bond strength of composite to dentin using conventional. one-step, and self-etching adhesive systems. J Dent 2001:29(1):55-61   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Santini A and Mitchell S. Microleakage of composite restorations bonded with three new dentin bonding agents. J Esthet Dent 1998: 10(6): 296-304   DOI
4 Cardoso PE, Placido E, Francci CE and Perdig O J. Microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations using five simplified adhesive systems. Am J Dent 1999:12:291-294   PUBMED
5 Reeves GW, Fitchie JG, Hembree JH and Puckett AD. Microleakage of new dentin bonding systems using human and bovine teeth. Operative Dentistry 1995:20(6):230-235   PUBMED
6 Santini A, Plasschaert AJ and Mitchell S. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents. Am J Dent 2001: 14(3): 132-136   PUBMED
7 Marinez CR and Greener EH. Utilization of electrical conductivity as an alternative method of assessing marginal leakage of pit and fissure sealants. J Oral Rehabil 1976:3(1):69-74   DOI
8 Bowen RL. Adhesive bonding of various materials to hard tooth tissues. Ⅱ. Bonding to dentin promoted by a surface-active comonomer. J Dent Res 1965 :44(5):895-902   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
9 Marshall GW. Dentin: Microstructure and characterization. Quint Int 1993:24:606-617
10 Iwami Y, Yamamoto Hand Ebisu S. A new electrical method for detecting marginal leakage of in vitro resin restorations. J Dent 2000:28:241-247   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Nakano Y. A new electrical testing method on marginal leakage of composite resin restorations. Japanese Journal of Conservative Dentistry 1985:28:1183-1198
12 Verdonschot EH, Rondel Pand Huysmans MC. Validity of eletrical conductance measurements in evaluating the marginal integrity of sealant restorations. Caries Res 1995:29: 100-106   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Croll TP and Helpin ML. Use of self-etching adhesive system and compomer for splinting traumatized incisors. Pediatr Dent 2002:24(1):53-56
14 Manhart J, Chen HY, Mehl A. Weber K and Hickel R. Marginal quality and microleakage of adhesive class V restorations. J Dent 2001 :29: 123-130   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Going RE. Microleakage around dental restorations: a summarizing review. J Am Dent Assoc 1972:84:1349-1357
16 Kemp-scholte CM and Davidson CL. Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 1990:69:1240-1243
17 Nelsen RJ. Woldott RB and Paffenbarger GC. Fluid exchange at the margins of dental restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1952:44:288
18 Besnault C and Attal JP. Influence of aa simulated oral environment on microleakage of two adhesive systems in Class II composite restorations. J Dent 2002:30:1-6   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Dumsha T and Biron G. Inhibition of marginal leakage with a dentin bonding agent. J Dent Res 1984:63(10):1255-1257   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
20 Douglas WH, Chen CJ and Craig RG. Neutron activation analysis of microleakage around a hydrophobic composite restorative. J Dent Res 1980:59(9): 1507-1510   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
21 Wieczkowski G. Joynt RB. Davis EL, Yu XY and Cleary K. Leakage patterns associated with glass-ionomer-based resin restorations. Oper Dent 1992:17(1): 21-25
22 Pilo Rand Ben-Amar A. Comparison of microleakage for three one-bottle and three multiple-step dentin bonding agents. J Prosth Dent 1999:82:209-213   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955:34:849-853   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
24 Rees JS and Jacobsen PH. The current status of composite materials and adhesive systems. 6: Techniques for indirect placement. Restorative Dent 1991: 7(1) :21-23   PUBMED