Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2003.28.1.011

EFFECT OF A REWETTING AGENT ON DENTIN ADHESION  

Cho, Young-Gon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of dentistry, Chosun University)
Park, Yil-Yoon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of dentistry, Chosun University)
Lee, Young-Gon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of dentistry, Chosun University)
Publication Information
Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics / v.28, no.1, 2003 , pp. 11-22 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study compared the dentin adhesion to composite resin according to air-dry, blot dry, application of rewetting agent on air-dry or blot dry dentin surface by microleakag test and SEM observation. For microleakage test, class V cavity preparations with dentinal margins were prepared on both buccal and lingual surfaces of 40 extracted human molars. For SEM observation, occlusal dentin of 20 extracted human molars were exposed. After etched the dentin, prepared teeth were randomly divided into four groups; D group: air dry for 10-15 sec., B group: blot dry with moist cotton pellet, D-R group: air dry and rewet with Aqua-Prep F for 20 sec., B-R group: blot dry and rewet with Aqua-Prep F for 20 sec. Treated cavities and surfaces were filled or constructed using One-Step adhesives and Aelitefil composite resins. Specimens were stored in distilled water for 24 hours. For microleakage test, the specimens were thermocycled and soaked into 2% methylene blue. The specimens were sectioned longitudinally and evaluated for microleakage under steromicroscope. The data were statistically analysed by Kuskal-Wallis Test, Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon signed ranked tests. For SEM observation, the specimens were bisectioned mesiodiatally. After decalcified and deproteinized, specimens were observed under SEM. The results of this study were as follows; 1. The microleakges on dentinal margin were the highest in D group compared with B group, D-R group, and B-R group(p<0.05). But there was no significant difference between B group, D-R group and B-R group. 2. D group showed gap and a few resin tags between dentin and composite resin. 3 B group, D-R group, and B-R groups showed close adaptation between dentin and composite resin. It showed that resin rags in B group were numerous and long, in D-R group were few and short, in B-R group were numerous and short or long. 4. Adhesive layer showed in D-R group ($10{\;}\mu\textrm{m}$) and B-R group ($3{\;}\mu\textrm{m}$) In conclusion, use of rewetting agent to dry dentin was efficient to dentin adhesion, also it did not provide reverse effect on blot dry dentin.
Keywords
Dentin adhesion; Air-dry; Blot dry; Rewetting agent; Microleakage; SEM;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Mehl A. Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH : Physical properties and gap formation of light-cured comlpposites with and without sofstart polymerization. J Dent 25 : 321-330, 1997   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Taylor MJ, Lynch E : Microleakage: Review. J Dent 20 : 3-10, 1992   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Amaral CM, Hara AT, Pimenta LAF, Rodrigues Jr. AL : Microleakage of hydrophillic systems in class V composite restorations. Am J Dent 14(1) : 31-34, 2001   PUBMED
4 Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E : The promotion of adhesion by infiltratrion of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 16 : 265-273, 1982   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Gwinnett AJ, Kanca J : Micromorphology of the bonded dentin interface and its relationship to bond strength. Am J Dent 5 : 73-77, 1992   PUBMED
6 Kanca J : Wet bonding: Effect of drying time and distance. Am J Dent 9 : 273-276, 1996   PUBMED
7 Miears JR, Charlton DG, Hermesch CB : Effect of dentin moisture and storage time on resin bonding. Am J Dent 8 : 80-82, 1995   PUBMED
8 Santini A, Mitchell S : Effect of wet and dry bonding techniques on marginal leakage. Am J Dent 11 : 219-224, 1998   PUBMED
9 Swift EJ : Resin desensitizers. J Esth Dent 11(6) : 289-290, 1999   DOI
10 Maciel KT, Carvalho RM, Ringle RD, Preston CD, Russell CM, Pashley DH : The effects of acetone, ethanol, HEMA. and air on the stiffness of human decalcified dentin matrix. J Dent Res 75 : 1851-1858, 1996   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Xu J. Stangel I, Butler IS, Gilson DFR : An FT-Raman spectroscopic investigation of dentin and collagen surface modified by 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate. J Dent Res 76 : 596-601, 1997   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Harashima I. Hirasawa T : Adsorption of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate on dentin from aqueous solution. Dent Mater J 9 : 36-46, 1990   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
13 Munksgaard EC, Asmussen E : Bond strength between dentin and restorative resins mediated by mixtures of HEMA and glutaraldehyde. J Dent Res 63 : 1087-1089, 1984   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
14 Nakabayashi N, Watanae A, Gendusa NJ : Dentin adhesion of modified 4-META/MMA-TBB resin: function of HEMA. Dent Mater 8 : 259-264, 1992   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Suzuke K, Takahashi M, Nakai H : Treatment of dentin by aqueous solution of amino acid derivatives : HEMA. J Adhes Dent 8 :43-51, 1990
16 Itoh K, Wakumoto S : Momentary pretreatment by 35% HEMA solution combined with five marketed bonding agents. Dent Mater J 6 : 28-31, 1987   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Pioch T, Staehle HJ, Schneider H, Duschner H, Dorfer CE : Effect of intrapulpal pressure simulation in vitro on shear bond strenghts and hybrid layer formation. Am J Dent 14(5) : 319-323, 2001   PUBMED
18 Ritter AV : Re-wetting agents for dentin bonding. J Esth Rest Dent 13(6) : 387-395. 2001   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Perdigao J, Swift EJ, Cloe BC : Effects of etchants, surface moisture, and resin composite on dentin bond strength. Am J Dent 6 : 61-64, 1993   PUBMED
20 Setien VJ, Cobb D, Denehy GE, Vargas M : Cavity preparation devices: Effect on microleakage of class V resin-based composite restorations. Am J Dent 14(3) : 157-162, 2001   PUBMED
21 Alani AH. Toh CG : Detection of microleakage around dental restoration: a review. Oper Dent 22 : 173-185, 1997
22 Applequist EA, Meiers JC : Effect of bulk insertion, prepolymerized resin composite restorations. Quint Int 4 : 253-258, 1996
23 Kanca J : Effect of drying on bonding strength. J Dent Res 70 : 304(Abstract 1029). 1991
24 Barnes, DM, McDonald NJ, Thompson VP, et. al. Microleakage in facial and lingual Class 5 composite restorations: A comparison. Oper Dent 19 : 133-137, 1994
25 Kanca J : Resin bonding to wet substrate. I. bonding to dentin. Quint Int 23(1) : 39-41, 1992
26 Kanca J. Sandrik J : Bonding to dentin, clues to the mechanism of adhesion. Am J Dent 11 : 154-159, 1998   PUBMED
27 Gwinnett AJ : Dentin bond strength after air drying and rewetting. Am J Dent 7(3) : 144-148, 1994   PUBMED
28 Ritter AV. Heymann HO, Swift Jr. EJ, Perdigao J, Rosa BT : Effects of different re-wetting techniques on dentin shear bond strengths. J Esth Dent 12(2) : 85-96, 2000   DOI
29 Mangum FI. Berry EA. DeSchepper E : Microleakage of incremental versus compression matrix bulk filling of cervical resin composite restorations. Gen Dent 42 : 304-308, 1994
30 Watanabe I, Takarada K, Nakabayashi N : Adhesion of 4-META/MMA-TBB resin to dentin pretreated with phosphoric acid. J Jap Dent Mater 10 : 671-677, 1997
31 Kanca J : Effect of resin primer solvents and surface wetness on resin composite bond strength to dentin. Am J Dent 5 : 213-215, 1992   PUBMED
32 Gladys S. Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechets P, Vanherle G : Microleakage of adhesive restorative materials. Am J Dent 14(3) : 170-176, 2001   PUBMED
33 Gallo JR. Henderson M, Burgess JO : Shear bond strength to moist and dry dentin of four dentin bonding systems. Am J Dent 13(5) : 267-270, 2000   PUBMED
34 Gwinnett AJ : Moist versus dry dentin: its effect on shear bond strength. Am J Dent 5 : 127-129, 1992   PUBMED
35 Santini A, Mitchell S : Microleakage of composite Esht Dent 10 : 296-304, 1998   DOI
36 Inokoshi S, Hosoda H, Harnirattisai C : Interfacial structure between dentin and seven dentin bonding systems revealed using argon ion beam etching. Oper Dent 18 : 8-16, 1993
37 Prati C, Tao L, Simpson M : Permeability and microleakage of class II resin composite resin restorations. J Dent 22 : 49-56, 1994   DOI   ScienceOn
38 Nakajima M, Sano H, Urabe I : Bond strength of single bottle dentin adhesives to caries-affected dentin. Oper Dent 25 : 2-10, 2000
39 Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Wei SHY: Micromorphological spectrum from overdrying to overwetting acid-conditioned dentin in water-free, acetone-based. single-bottle primer-adhesives. Dent Mater 12 : 236-244, 1996   DOI   ScienceOn
40 Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Verschueren M : Clinical status of ten dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 73 : 1690-1702, 1994   DOI   PUBMED
41 Perdigao J, Van Meerbeek B, Lopes MM, Ambrose WW : The effect of a re-wetting agent on dentin bonding. Dent Mater 15 : 282-295, 1999   DOI   ScienceOn
42 Pilo R, Cardash HS, Oz-Ari B, Ben-Amar A : Effect of preliminary treatment of the dentin surface on the shear bond strength of resin composite to dentin. Oper Dent 26 : 569-575, 2001
43 Santini A, Plasschaert AJM, Mitchell S : Marginal leakage of filled dentin adhesives used with wet and dry bonding techniques. Am J Dent 13(2) : 93-97, 2000   PUBMED
44 Saunders WP, Saunders EM : Microleakage of bonding agents with wet versus dry bonding techniques. Am J Dent 9 : 34-36, 1996   PUBMED
45 Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Wei SHY: Micromorphological spectrum of acid conditioned dentin following the application of a water-based adhesive. Dent Mater 14 : 329-338, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
46 Dietschi D, De Siebenthal G, Neveu-Rosenstand L : Influence of the restorative technique and new adhesives on the dentin marginal seal and adaptation of resin composite class II restoration: an in vitro evaluation. Quint Int 10: 717-727, 1995
47 Perdigao J, Swift EJ, Heymann HO, Malek MA : Effect of a re-wetting agent on the performance of acetonebased dentin adhesives. Am J Dent 11 : 207-213, 1999
48 Rossomando JJ, Wendt SLJ : Thermocycling and dwell times in microleakage evaluation for bonded restorations. Dent Mater 11 : 47-51, 1995   DOI   ScienceOn
49 Bauer JF, Henson JL : Microleakage a measure of the performance of direct filling materials. Oper Dent 9 : 2-9, 1984
50 Sugizaki J : The effects of various primers on dentin adhesion of resin composites. SEM and TEM observation of the resin impregnated layer and adhesion promoting effect of the primer. Jap J Cons Dent 34 : 228-265, 1991
51 Di Renzo M, Ellis T. Domingue A. Bertrand L. Sacher E, Stangel I : Chemical reactions between dentin and bonding agents. J Adhes Dent 74: 115-121, 1994
52 Nakajima M, Kanemura N, Pereira PNR, Tagami J, Pashley DH : Comparative microtensile bond strength and SEM analysis of bonding to wet and dry dentin. Am J Dent 13(6) : 354-328, 2000
53 Gwinnett AJ : Chemically conditioned dentin: a comparison of conventional and environmental scanning electron microscopy findings. Dent Mater 10 : 150-155, 1994   PUBMED
54 Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Wei SHY: Ultrastructure of the resin-dentin interface following reversible and irreversible re-wetting. Am J Dent 10 : 77-82, 1997   PUBMED
55 Kidd EAM : Microleakage: a review. J Dent 4 : 199-205, 1976   DOI   ScienceOn
56 Perdigao J, Geraldeli S, Carmo ARP, Dutra HR : In vivo influence of residual moisture on microtensile bond strength of one-bottle adhesives. J Esth Rest Dent 14(1) : 31-38, 2002   DOI   ScienceOn
57 Peschke A, Blunck U. Roulet JF : Influence of incorrect application of a water-based adhesive system on the marginal adaptation of class V restorations. Am J Dent 13(5) : 239-244 2000   PUBMED
58 Santini A : Microleakage of resin-based composite restorations using different solvent-based bonding agents and methods of drying acid-etched dentin. J Dent 12(4) : 194-200, 1999