Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2003.28.1.001

THE INFLUENCE OF IRM TEMPORARY RESTORATIONS ON MARGINAL MICROLEAKAGE OF DENTIN ADHESIVES  

Cho, Young-Gon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of dentistry, Chosun University)
Kim, Hyun-Kyung (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of dentistry, Chosun University)
Lee, Young-Gon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of dentistry, Chosun University)
Publication Information
Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics / v.28, no.1, 2003 , pp. 1-10 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study investigated the influence of IRM on marginal microleakage of 5th generation adhesives. Class V cavities with gingival margins in dentin were prepared on both buccal and lingual surfaces of 60 extract-ed human molar teeth. Prepared teeth were randomly divided into six groups. Group 1 and 4 received no temporary restoration with IRM. Group 2 and 5 were covered with IRM mixed at P/L ratio(10g/1g). Group 3 and 6 were covered with IRM mixed at P/L ratio(10g/2g). The temporary restorations were removed mechanically with an ultrasonic scaler after one-week storage in distilled water. The cavities were restored using one of two adhesives and composites ; Single Bond/Filtek Z 250(Croup 1, 2 and 3), UniFil Bond/UniFil F(Group 4, 5 and 6). Following one day storage in distilled water, the restored teeth were thermocycled for 500 cycles(between $5^{\circ}C{\;}and{\;}55^{\circ}C$) and immersed in 2 % methylene blue for dye penetration testing. The results were analysed using Kruskal-Wallis Test, Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon signed ranked test at a significance level of 0.05. The results of this study were as follows 1. Ranking of mean microleakage scores at the enamel margins was Group 10.05) 4. At the dentin margins, the microleakage of the group not pretreated with IRM was lower than that of the group pretreated with IRM. And the microleakage of UniFil Bond was lower than that of Single Bond. 5. Compared with microleakages between the enamel and dentin margins of each groups, Group 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 at dentin margin were higher microleakage than those at enamel margin. There were significant difference between enamel and dentin microleakage of Group 2 and 3(p<0.05).
Keywords
Temporary restoration; Marginal microleakage; IRM; Dentin adhesives; Self-etching primer; One bottle adhesive;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Peter EM, Abeer AH, Anthony JS, Charles FC : Bacterial microleakage and pulp inflammation associated with various restorative materials. Dent Mater 18 : 470-478, 2002   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Imad AH, Jean C, Jacques D, Jean CF : Eugenol diffusion through dentin related to dentin hydraulic conductance. Dent Mater 14 : 229-236, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Hume WR : An analysis of the release and diffusion through dentin of eugenol from zinc oxide-eugenol mixtures. J Dent Res 63(6) : 881-884, 1984   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
4 Lingard GL, Davies EH, Von Fraunhofer JA : The interaction between lining materials and composite resin restorative materials, J Oral Rehab 8(2): 121-129, 1981   DOI
5 Baier RE : Principles of adhesion. Oper Dent Supplement 5 : 1-9, 1992
6 AI-Ehaideb AA, Mohammed H : Microleakage of 'onebottle' dentin adhesives. Oper Dent 26 : 172-175, 2001
7 Gordan VV, Vargas MA, Cobb DS, Denehy GE : Evaluation of adhesive systems using acidic primers. Am J Dent 10(5) : 219-223, 1997   PUBMED
8 Ogata M, Okuda M, Nakajima M, Pereira PNR, Sano H, Tagami J : Influence of the direction of tubules on bond strength to dentin. Oper Dent 26 : 27-35, 2001
9 Gallo JR. Burgess JO, Xu X : Effect of delayed application on shear bond strength of four fifth-generation bonding systems. Oper Dent 26 : 27-35, 2001
10 Kanca J : Effect of resin primer solvents and surface wetness on resin composite bond strength to dentin. Am J Dent 5(4) : 213-215, 1992   PUBMED
11 Hanning M, Reinhardt KJ, Bott B : Composite to dentin bond strength, micromorphology of the bonded dentin interface and marginal adaptation of class II composite resin restorations using self-etching primers. Oper Dent 26 : 157-165, 2001
12 Chigara H, Yukitani W, Hasegawa T, Manabe A, Itoh K, Hayakawa T, Debari K, Wakumoto S, Hisamitsu H : Self-etching dentin primers containing phenyl-P, J Dent Res 73(5) : 1088-1095, 1994   DOI   PUBMED
13 Schwartz R. Davis R, Mayhew R : The effect of a ZOE temporary cement on the bond strength of a resin luting cement. Am J Dent 3(1) : 28-30, 1990   PUBMED
14 장헌수, 조규종 : Temporary cement가 상아질 접착제의 접착성능에 미치는 영향, 대한치과보존학회지 20(2) : 685-698, 1995
15 Yap AUJ, Shah KC, Loh EJ, Sim SS, Tan CC : Influence of ZOE temporary restorations on microleakage in composite restoration. Oper Dent 27 : 142-146, 2002
16 Finger WJ, Fritz UB : Resin bonding to enamel and dentin with one-component UDMA/HEMA adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci 105(2) : 183-186, 1997   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Uno S. Inoue H, Finger WJ, Inouw S, Sano H : Microtensile bond strength evaluation of three adhesive systems in cervical dentin cavities. J Adhes Dent 3 : 333-341, 2001
18 Torii Y, Itou R, Hikasa S, Iwata Y : Enamel tensile bond strength and morphology of resin-enamel interface created by acid etching system with or without moisture and self-etching priming system. J Oral Rehabil 29 : 528-533, 2002   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Zheng L, Pereira PNR, Nakajima M, Sano H, Tagami J : Relationship between adhesive thickness and microtensile bond strength. Oper Dent 26 : 97-104, 2001
20 Xie J, Power JM, McGuckin RS : In vitro bond strength of two adhesives to enamel and dentin under normal and contaminated conditions. Dent Mater 9(5) : 295-299, 1993   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Woody TL, Davis RD : The effect of eugenol-containing and eugenol free temporary cements on microleakage in resin bonded restorations. Oper Dent 17(5) : 175-180, 1992
22 Bayne SC, Heyman HO. Swift EJ Jr. : Update on dental composite restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 125(6) 687-701, 1994   DOI
23 Grajower R, Hirschfeld Z, Zalkind M : Compatibility of a composite resin with pulp insulating materials. A scanning electron microscope study. J Prosthet Dent 32(1) : 70-77, 1974   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Yoshiyama M, Urayama A, Kimochi T, Matsuo T, Pashley DH : Comparison of conventional vs self-etching adhesives bonds to caries-affected dentin. Oper Dent 25 : 163-169, 2000
25 Dibdin GH, Poole DF : Surface area and pore size analysis for human enamel and dentin by water vapour sorption. Archi Oral Biology 27 : 235-241, 1982   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Jung M, Ganss C, Senger S : Effect of eugenol-containing temporary cement on bond strength of composite to enamel. Oper Dent 23(2) : 63-68, 1998
27 Kelsey WP, Latta MA, Blankenau RJ : Effect of provision restorations on dentin bond strength of resin cements. Am J Dent 11 : 67-70, 1998
28 Perdigao J, Lopes L, Lambrechts P : Effect of selfetching primer on enamel shear bond strengths and SEM morphology. Am J Dent 10 : 141-146, 1997   PUBMED
29 Marshall SJ, Marshall GW, Hardcourt JK : The influence of various cavity bases on the micro-hardness of composite. Aus Dent J 27(5) : 291-295, 1982   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Samuel S : Biologic properties of eugenol and zinc oxide-eugenol. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 73 : 729-737, 1992   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Hanning M, Reinhardt KJ, Bott B : Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite- to-enamel bonding. Oper Dent 24: 172-180, 1999
32 조영곤, 김영관, 안종모 : 상아질 접착제에 따른 미세누출과 변연부 혼화층. 대한치과보존학회지 27(1) : 34-41, 2002
33 Terata R : Characterization of enamel and dentin surfaces after removal of temporary cement - study on removal of temporary cement. Dent Mater J 12 : 1828, 1993
34 Nakajima M, Sano H. Urabe I, Tagami J, Pashley DH : Bond strength of single-bottle dentin adhesives to caries-affected dentin. Oper Dent 25 : 2-10, 2000
35 Nakayabashi N : Dentinal bonding mechanism. Quint Int 22(2) : 73-74, 1991
36 Terata R, Nakashima K, Obara M, Kubota M : Characterization of enamel and dentin surface after removal of temporary cement-effect of temporary cement on tensile bond strength of resin luting cement. Dent Mater J 13(2) : 148-154, 1994   DOI   ScienceOn
37 Nakanuma K. Arisue K. Kajiwara A. Niinuma A. Murakami Y, Yamazaki M, Hayakawa T, Nemoto K : Evaluation of new type of commercially available adhesive systems-effect of total treatment for enamel and dentin. Jpn J Conserv Dent 39 : 304-314, 1996
38 Peutzfeldt A, Asmunssen E : Influence of eugenol-containing temporary cement on efficacy of dentin-bonding system. Eur J Oral Science 107(1) : 65-69, 1999   DOI   ScienceOn
39 Kielbassa AM, Attin T, Hellwig E : Diffusion behavior of eugenol from zinc oxide-eugenol mixtures through human and bovine dentin in vitro. Oper Dent 22(1) : 15-20, 1997
40 Yap AUJ, Shah KC, Loh EJ, Sim SS, Tan CC : Influence of eugenol-containing temporary restorations on bond strength of composite to dentin. Oper Dent 26 : 556-561, 2001
41 Rosa BT, Perdigao J : Bond strengths of nonrinsing adhesives, Quint Int 31 : 353-358, 2000
42 Pitter AV, Heyman HO, Swift E Jr, Perdigao J, Rosa BT : Effect of different rs-wetting techniques on dentin shear bond strength. J Esth Dent 12 : 85-96, 2000   DOI
43 Ganss C, Jung M : Effect of eugenol-containing temporary cement on bond strength of composite to dentin. Oper Dent 23(2) : 55-62, 1998
44 Tiara J. Ikemoto T, Yoneya T, Hagi A, Murakami A, Makino K : Essential oils phenyl propanoids. Useful as OH scavenger? Free Radical Research Communications 16 : 197-204, 1992   DOI
45 Prati C, Pashley DH, Chersoni S, Mongiorgi R : Marginal hybrid layer in class V restorations. Oper Dent 25 : 228-233, 2000