Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2002.27.6.612

A STUDY OF HISTOMORPHOLOGICAL CHANGE OF CURVED ROOT CANAL PREPARATION USING GT ROTARY FILE, PROFILE AND STAINLESS STEEL K-FILE  

Ko, Hyung-Jung (Department of Conservative Dentistry College of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Baek, Seung-Ho (Department of Conservative Dentistry College of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics / v.27, no.6, 2002 , pp. 612-621 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the histomorphological change of curved root canal preparation using GT rotary File, Profile .04 taper and stainless steel K-file. 45 mesial canals(over 20 degree) of extracted human mandibular first molars were mounted in resin using a modified Bramante muffle system and divided into three groups. The roots were cross-sectioned at 2.5mm 5mm and 8mm levels from apical foramen. Tracings of the canals were made from preinstrumentation pictures of the cross section. The canals were prepared using a step-back technique with stainless steel K file(group 1), Profile .04 taper rotary file(group 2) and GT rotary file(group 3). Tracings of the prepared canals were made from postinstrumentation picture. Canal centring ratio. amount of transportation, area of dentin removed and shape of canal were measured and statistically were evaluated with Student-Newman-Keuls test using Sigma Stat(Jandel Scientific Software, USA). The results were as followings : 1 Amount of transportation of group 2 was the lowest at apical part, but there was no statistical difference. The direction of transportation was the outside of curvature at apical part. 2. Centering ratio at the apical part of group 1 was the highest, and there was statistical differences between apical and middle part, apical and coronal part(p＜0.05). Centering ratio at the middle part of group 3 was the lowest, and there was statistical difference between apical and middle part(p＜0.05). Centering ratio of group 2 was the lowest at apical part, but there was no statistical difference. 3. Amount of dentin removed of group 1 was the highest at coronal, middle and apical part among three groups, and there was statistical difference(p＜0.05). 4. The majority of the cross-sectioned canal shape after instrumentation were irregular at coronal, middle and apical part. But there are more number of round shaped canals at group 3 than other group.
Keywords
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Weine F, Kelly R, Lio P. The effect of preparation procedures on the original canal shape and on apical foramen shape. J Endodon 1975;1:255-62   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Walsh C, EIDeeb ME. Messee HH. Effect of varying ultrasonic power on instrumentation time and prepared canal space. J Endodon 1987;13:133-8
3 Walia H, Brantley WA, Gerstein H, An investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endodon 1988;14:346-51
4 Esposito PT, Cunningham CJ. A comparison of canal preparation with Nickel-Titanium and Stainless steel instruments. J Endodon 1995;21:173-6   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Lee SJ, Shin YG, Hwang HK. Transportation of curved canal after canal enlargement according to filing instruments. J KACD 24:503-510, 1999
6 Kosa DA, Marshall G, Baumgartner JC An analysis of canal centring using mechanical instrumentation techniques, J Endodon 25:441-445, 1999   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am 1974;18:269-96   PUBMED
8 Bolanos OR, Jensen JR. Scanning electron microscope comparison of the efficacy of various methods of root cnal preparation. J Endodon 6:815-821, 1980   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Tucker DM. Wenckus CS, Bentkover SK: Canal wall planning by engine-driven Nickel-Titanium instruments, compared with stainless steel hand instrumentation. J Endodon 23:170-173, 1997   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Morgan LA, Montgomery S. An evaluation of the crown-down pressureless technique. J Endodon 1984;10:491-8   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Chenail BL. Teplitsky PE. Endosonics in curved root canals. J Endodon 1985; 11:369-74   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Luiten DJ, Morgan LA, Baumgartner JC. A comparison of four instrumentation techniques on apical canal transportation. J Endodon 21:26-32, 1995   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Glosson CR, Haller RH. Dove SB, Rio CE. A comparison of root canal preparations using NiTi hand, NiTi engine-driven, and K-Flex endodontic instruments. J Endodon 1005;21:146-51   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Tachibana H, Matsumoto K : Applicability of x-ray computerized tomography in endodontics. Endod Dent Traumatol 6:16-20, 1990   DOI
15 Calhoun G, Mongomery S. The effects of four instrumentation technique on root canal shape. J Endodon. 14: 273-277, 1988   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Gambill JM, Alder M, Rio CE Comparioson of NickelTitanium and stainless steel hand-file instrumentation using computed tomography J Endodon 22:369-375, 1996   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Weine F. Endodontic therapy St. Louis: CV Mosby. 1989:277
18 Lim KA, Yoon SH A comparision of stainless steel K-file, Profile.04, and Quantec LX instruments to shape curved root canals in vitro, 대한치과보존학회지 25:133-140, 2000
19 Bou Dagher FE, Yared GM. Comparison of three files to prepare curved root canals. J Endodon 1995;21:264-5   DOI   ScienceOn
20 백승호, 만곡근관에서 Engine-driven NiTi file, 초음파기구, stainless steel file을 이용한 근관형성 후 근관형태 변화에 관한 연구, 대한치과협회지 1995;34:5:363-371
21 이지현, 조용범 수종의 근관형성 방법이 근관형태에 미치는 영향, 대한치과보존협회지 24:337-345, 1999
22 박한수 등, ProFile을 이용한 만곡근관 형성시 근관형태에 관한 연구, 대한치과보존학회지, 24:633-637
23 Buchanan LS. The shape of things to come. Dentistry today., 13 1994
24 Goerig A, Michelich R, Schultz H. Instrumentation of root canals in molars using the step-down technique. J Endodon 1982;8:550-4   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Roane J. Sabala C. Duncanson M. The 'balanced force' concept for instrumentation of curved canals. J Endodon 1985;11 203-11   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Hata G, Uemura M, Toda T. Kato AS, Irnura, A comparison of shaping ability using ProFile, GT file, and Flex-R endodontic instruments in simulated canals. J Endodon. 25:4:299, 1999
27 Haga CS, Microscope measurements of root canal preparations folowing instrumentation, J Br Endo Soc 2:41-46, 1968   DOI
28 Bramante CM, Berbert A, Borges RP: A Methdology for evaluation of root canal instrumentation. J Endodon 13;243-45. 1987   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Walton R. Current concepts of canal preparation. Dent Clin North Am 1992;32:309-326
30 Mizrahi SJ, Yucker JW, Seltzer S: A scanning electron microscopic study of the efficacy of various endodontic instruments. J Endodon 1:324-33, 1975   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Baumgartner JC, Martin H, Sabala CL, Strittmatter EJ, Wildey WL, Quigley NC. Histomorphic comparison of canals prepared by four techniques. J Endodon 1992; 17:530-4
32 Walton RE. Histologic evaluation of different methods of enlarging the pulp canal space, J Endodon 10:304-310, 1976